RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02735
INDEX CODE: 110.02
xxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE
xxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 FEB 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His narrative reason for separation be changed from
miscellaneous/general reasons to reduction in force.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes the narrative reason for separation is inaccurate.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form
214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants master personnel records were reconstructed, because
his original records were lost. His available records reflect he
enlisted in the Regular Air Force as an airman basic on 28 January
2003 for a term of 4 years.
Applicant was released from active duty on 28 January 2005, under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen
(miscellaneous/general reasons) with an honorable discharge. He
served two years and one day on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS states that according to Military
Personnel Flight memorandum (MPFM) 04-35, the separation program
designator for individuals being released from active duty under the
LADSC Program will be “MND” and the narrative reason will be
“miscellaneous/general reasons”.
DPPRS states that based on the documentation on file in the records,
the separation was consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the discharge regulation. The discharge was within
the discretion of the discharge authority, the applicant did not
submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that
occurred in the discharge processing, the narrative reason for
separation is correct and no corrective action is required.
The DPPRS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant states that he does not have copies of his personnel
records and his records can’t be found by the Air Force. He states
the advisory opinion recommending denial is based on an unsigned
document and he believes that his separation was a reduction in force,
not miscellaneous/general reasons.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice warranting a change in his
narrative reason for separation. After reviewing the evidence of
record to include applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that
the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice. In view
of the above, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-
02735 in Executive Session on 16 November 2005, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Panel Chair
Mr. Wallace F. Beard Jr., Member
Mr. Terry L. Scott, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Aug 05, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 21 Sep 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Sep 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 21 Oct 05.
LAURENCE M. GRONER
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02735
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02735 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 FEB 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation be changed from miscellaneous/general reasons to reduction in force and his records be corrected to reflect his eligibility for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02735
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02735 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 3 MARCH 2009 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Record (OSR) be corrected to include his Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period ending 15 May 07 and he be considered for retention by a Special Selection Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02869
In support of his application, applicant submits a copy of his unemployment claim history Applicant completion submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial and states that, based on the evidence of record, the applicant’s discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. After a thorough review of the evidence of record...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2005-00316
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00316 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 JUL 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reenlistment eligibility (RE) code reflected on his DD Form 214 be changed from “4H” to “1J.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02861
The Separation Code he received is, in fact, the code authorized for the type of early separation he requested. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02478
Headquarters Twenty-Second Air Force/JA reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient and recommended applicant’s request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial be approved. On 18 February 1990, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his UOTHC discharge be upgraded to honorable. The AFDRB reviewed the evidence of record and concluded the discharge was consistent with procedural and substantive requirements of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03403
AFBCMR BC-2004-03403 Index Code: 110.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01092
Basis for commander’s recommendation were: (1) On or about 30 March 1992, he received an ATC Form 341, Excellence/Discrepancy Report, for standing with his hands in his pockets. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The applicant did not submit any...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02716
On 24 Sep 90, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-10, with separation code HDG (Inability to perform prescribed duties due to parenthood), and was issued an RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge). A review of the applicant’s military records revealed that she was recommended for discharge from the Air Force for failure to fulfill dependent care responsibilities. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01050
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01050 INDEX NUMBER: 110.02 COUNSEL: J.C. HERNANDEZ HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Applicant's Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter,...