RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01592
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 November 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Block 11 (Primary Specialty), be corrected to reflect
his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) skill level as 7S071 rather than
7S031.
His request for Foreign Service (Block 12.f.) and Military Education
(Block 14) corrections on his DD Form 214 have been administratively
corrected. In addition, Block 13 (Decorations), was corrected to
include the Iraq Campaign Medal. Hence, no Board action is required
on this portion of the applicant’s appeal.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
All required training was accomplished and AFSC 7S071 was awarded
(Counterintel and Career Enhancement Course/Probation Period). Errors
may have occurred due to poor records/systems update practices.
In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of his DD Form
214, award certificates, training forms, certificates of training and
medical documents. The applicant’s complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant's military personnel records are unavailable.
Information extracted from applicant’s DD Form 214 reveals that he
entered active duty on 22 October 1997 and was progressively promoted
to the grade of staff sergeant (E-5). The applicant was released from
active duty on 11 April 2005 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208
(completion of required active service). His Primary Specialty codes
(Block 11) were reflected as 7S031, Special Investigations, (four
years and one month) and 1C451, Tactical Air Command and Control,
(three years and four months). The applicant had completed a total of
7 years, 5 months and 20 days and was serving in the grade of E-5 at
the time of separation.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAC recommends the applicant’s request for correction to his
AFSC be denied. DPPAC states that the two documents provided
(Certificate of Training, Career Enhancement and Counterintelligence
Operations Training Course, Course Number: 644AC7S071; and,
Certificate of Training, Advanced Deployment of Operations Course 2004-
005, Course ID: 544AA7S071-030) are not source documents for awarding
the 7-skill level or verifying the period of 7S071 performance.
Additional documentation is necessary to properly evaluate the
applicant’s request. If the applicant can provide documentation
substantiating he was upgraded; i.e., special orders, AF Forms 2096,
APRs, etc., DPPAC will reconsider his appeal. The HQ AFPC/DPPAC
evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 29
July 2005 for review and response. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. His contentions are duly noted;
however, we do not find these uncorroborated assertions, in and by
themselves sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided
by the Air Force office of primary responsibility. We, therefore,
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the appropriate Air Force
office and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision
that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has
suffered either an error or an injustice. In view of the above and
absent evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 1 November 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Marilyn M. Thomas, Vice Chair
Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Member
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with
AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2005-01592.
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 May 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAC, dated 12 Jul 05, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Jul 05.
MARILYN M. THOMAS
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02643
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. DFAS-POCC/DE recommends denial of the applicant’s request for back pay. When Government records are no longer available and the applicant is unable to provide sufficient evidence to support their request, the request should be denied. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were sent to the applicant on...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01959
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01959 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 DECEMBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 2A771, Aircraft...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03952
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided copies of his DD Form 214, his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, and an AF Form 2096, Classification/On-The-Job Training Action. He was serving in the grade of staff sergeant and had served 7 years, 11 months, and 8 days at the time of his separation. Further, and notwithstanding his inclusion of an AF Form 2096 indicating his AFSC at the 7-level, his discharge package reveals he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03556
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAC indicates the applicant substantiated his primary specialty at the time of separation from the Army was Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 96B20, intelligence analyst. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that he should be reclassified or awarded a secondary AFSC. The applicant was classified as an intelligence technician...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01991
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01991 INDEX CODE: 106.00, 100.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect an Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 81150 rather than 81130, and his 1985 discharge be upgraded from general to honorable. According to his Enlisted...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02310
Not every IDMT-qualified member was identified, mostly because they were not in an IDMT position. Only those individuals assigned to an IDMT 4N0X1C CAFSC position at the time of the conversion were considered for promotion as an IDMT in the CY05 cycle. As to whether some individuals were incorrectly promoted because they were “lucky” enough to be identified in the wrong CAFSC, promotion selections are “tentative pending verification by the MPF” (AFI 36-2502) and airmen are not “to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02361
Only those individuals assigned to an IDMT 4N0X1C CAFSC position at the time of the conversion were considered for promotion as an IDMT in the CY05 cycle. Complete copies of the applicant’s responses, with attachments, are at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: HQ AFPC/DPPPWB advised that prior to the start of the promotion cycle, CFMs are advised that if they feel it is appropriate for the suffix and “slick” AFSCs...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02683
Only those individuals assigned to an IDMT 4N0X1C CAFSC position at the time of the conversion were considered for promotion as an IDMT in the CY05 cycle. As to whether some individuals were incorrectly promoted because they were “lucky” enough to be identified in the wrong CAFSC, promotion selections are “tentative pending verification by the MPF” (AFI 36-2502) and airmen are not “to assume the grade when data verification discovers missing or erroneous data.” Therefore, if an IDMT serving...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02723
Only those individuals assigned to an IDMT 4N0X1C CAFSC position at the time of the conversion were considered for promotion as an IDMT in the CY05 cycle. We therefore conclude the fair and right thing to do is to recommend the 4N0X1C members be given supplemental consideration in the CAFSC 4N0X1 for the 05E6/05E7 promotion cycle. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02404
Only those individuals assigned to an IDMT 4N0X1C CAFSC position at the time of the conversion were considered for promotion as an IDMT in the CY05 cycle. We therefore conclude the fair and right thing to do is to recommend the 4N0X1C members be given supplemental consideration in the CAFSC 4N0X1 for the 05E6/05E7 promotion cycle. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...