RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01235
INDEX CODE: 110.02
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 October 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His discharge be changed to reflect fraudulent entry.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Homosexuality is not a crime and asking one’s sexual orientation is
inappropriate. It is no longer legal to ask one’s sexual orientation under
“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” He was asked.
The applicant has not provided any evidence to support his claim. A copy
of the applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 14 August 1987, the applicant was appointed a captain in the Air Force
Reserve as a clinical nurse and ordered to active duty on 1 October 1987.
He had previously served four years, three months, and ten days on active
duty in the United States Navy between 21 August 1982 and 30 November 1986
as a commissioned officer.
On 11 October 1988, the applicant was notified by his commander of
information received warranting the initiation of action against him under
Air Force Regulation (AFR) 36-2, Chapter 3, paragraphs 3-7h, due to
homosexual activity. On 6 December 1988, after consulting counsel, the
applicant waived his right to a hearing before a Board of Inquiry and
requested discharge in lieu of further action under the regulation. On 20
January 1989, the applicant was charged with applying for appointment as a
commissioned officer and in the process knowingly made false representation
by stating that he had never been or was not then homosexual. On 30
January 1989, the Secretary of the Air Force denied the applicant’s request
for discharge. On 9 February 1989, the applicant tendered his resignation
from all appointments in the Air Force for the good of the service because
his conduct rendered him triable by court-martial. On 7 March 1989, his
commander recommended the applicant resignation be approved and that he be
discharged under other than honorable conditions. On 18 April 1989, the
Secretary of the Air Force accepted the applicant’s resignation under AFR
36-12, Table 2-8, Rule 1, and directed he be discharged under other than
honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged effective 3 May 1989
with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge. He had
served one year, seven months, and three days on active duty with the Air
Force.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the FBI indicated that on the basis of the
data furnished, they were unable to locate an arrest record pertaining to
the applicant.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS reviewed the applicant’s case file and submits no
recommendation. DPPRS defers to the Board to determine if the applicant
should be granted relief based on the documentation on file in his master
personnel records. DPPRS states that under current Department of Defense
and Air Force guidelines, the applicant would have received a discharge
characterization of honorable if there is no indication he attempted,
solicited, or committed a homosexual act by using force, coercion, or
intimidation. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 may
2005, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date,
this office has received no response.
On 17 August 2005, the applicant was given the opportunity to submit
comments about his post service activities (Exhibit E). As of this date,
this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence
of record we see no evidence to show that the applicant’s discharge was
erroneous. However, the Board majority notes under current Air Force
standards the applicant would have received an honorable discharge. After
reviewing the applicant’s submission, a majority of the Board believes his
current service characterization is excessively harsh and an upgrade of his
discharge to honorable is warranted. The Board majority also believes the
circumstances of this case warrant a change to the reason for the
applicant’s separation to one less prejudicial to him. Accordingly, the
Board majority recommends his records be corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 3 May 1989, he was honorably
discharged under the provisions of AFR 36-12, Table 2-6, Rule 15, Voluntary
Resignation, Miscellaneous Reasons; with a separation code of “FND;” and he
was furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 20 September 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
By a majority vote, the Board recommended to grant the application. Ms.
White-Olson voted to deny the applicant request and submitted a minority
report (Exhibit F). The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2005-01235 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 may 05.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 26 May 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 May 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 17 Aug 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Minority Report.
B. J. WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-01235
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that on 3 May
1989, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFR 36-12, Table
2-6, Rule 15, Voluntary Resignation, Miscellaneous Reasons; with a
separation code of “FND;” and he was furnished an Honorable Discharge
certificate.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03498
(4) On or about 23 January 1980, applicant willfully disobeyed a lawful command from a superior commissioned officer, to return to his office. A FBI Report was forwarded to the applicant on 7 January 2005 for review and response within 15 days. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his discharge should be upgraded to honorable.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00310
He completed a total of 2 years, 1 month, and 25 days of active service and was serving in the grade of airman (E-2) at the time of discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that based on the documentation in the applicant’s master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03196 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Military Personnel Management Specialist, Separations...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00398
He had completed a total of 21 years and 7 months of active service for retirement. At the time of the applicant’s requested retirement date, the Secretary of the Air Force (SAF) authorized, effective 6 May 2004, a reduction of the three-year TIG requirement for lieutenant colonels to retire in grade with no less than two-years TIG and delegated approval/disapproval authority to HQ AFPC/DPPR. Under the HQ USAF/DP message, the applicant was not authorized to request a later retirement date...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02738
The applicant in his statement notes that no notification of state medical boards was made at the time of his discharge. In fact, in his letter requesting resignation in lieu of court martial, he indicated he had already made arrangements for continued rehabilitation following separation. CATHLYNN B. SPARKS Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-02738 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02329
He received an Article 15, dated 11 January 1956, for failure to go to his place of duty. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2005-02329 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00759
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an investigative report pertaining to the applicant (Identification Record No. GREGORY H. PETKOFF Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00274
The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In further support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of the AETC Form 125A, Record of Administrative Training Action, which contains the detachment and squadron commander’s support of his request to transfer to the National Guard to remain as a pararescue candidate and complete his medical training as a civilian in a slower paced...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00143
The commander was recommending applicant receive an under honorable conditions (general) discharge based on the following: (1) On 7 February 1983, 1 October 1982, 28 September 1982, 29 June 1982, and 9 October 1981, he received individual counseling for failure to go at the time prescribed. The base legal office found the case to be legally sufficient to support separation and recommended applicant be discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge without probation and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01791
On 11 August 1964, applicant was notified that the commander was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force as an unsuitable airman under the provisions of Section B, AFR 39-16, and that he be furnished a general discharge. The evaluation officer recommended applicant be discharged from the Air Force with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge without being subject to the rehabilitation program. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...