Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01155
Original file (BC-2005-01155.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01155
            INDEX NUMBER: 107.00

      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  7 OCT 06

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

On or about 27 August 1951, during the occupation of Germany, he was  injury
by a Nazi SS Officer, who deliberately drove a tractor  into  the  front  of
the military jeep he was riding in while on  official  Air  Force  business.
Since he was injured by an enemy combatant that the United States  had  been
engaged with in a time of war, he should be awarded the PH.

In support of the appeal, applicant submits  two  unsigned  statements  from
the former squadron commander  and  squadron  adjutant,  extracts  from  his
military medical  records,  and  a  statement  from  a  civilian  orthopedic
specialist.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 30  September  1947.   An
8 September 1951, military medical record entry indicates  that  he  injured
his shoulder on 21 August 1951  in  an  off-base  automobile  accident.   He
voluntarily retired in the grade of senior master sergeant on 1 July 1971.

On  4  March  2005,  the  Air  Force  Purple  Heart  Review  Board  (AFPHRB)
considered and denied applicant’s request for the PH.




The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result  of  enemy  actions
(i.e., gunshot  or  shrapnel  wounds,  hand-to-hand  combat  wounds,  forced
aircraft bail out injuries, etc.).  In addition, it is necessary  the  wound
required or received treatment by medical personnel.  Indirect  injuries  do
not meet the criteria for award of the PH.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states,  in  part,  that
applicant provided no eyewitness statements from the others  riding  in  the
vehicle during the accident to validate his claim.  Further, the  statements
from the squadron commander and squadron  adjutant  are  considered  invalid
due to being unsigned.

The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The evaluation attempts to interject a criteria which is  not  part  of  the
mandated Department of  Defense  (DoD)  requirements,  that  he  provide  an
eyewitness statement from the  others  riding  in  the  vehicle  during  the
accident to validate  his  claim.   The  governing  regulation  specifically
states the wound for which the award is made must  have  required  treatment
by a medical  officer  and  records  of  medical  treatment  for  wounds  or
injuries received must have been made a matter  of  record.   In  his  case,
there is no question  his  military  medical  records  reveal  that  he  was
treated at a military medical facility after the incident.  Further, he  was
not under the influence of alcohol at the time of the incident as  evidenced
by the fact that his injury was determined in the line of duty.

The applicant’s complete responses, with attachments, are at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.   In  this  respect,  we  note  the  PH  is
awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions  and  it  is
necessary the wound required or received  treatment  by  medical  personnel.
The applicant’s records contain a medical record entry which indicates  that
he was involved in an automobile accident on 27 August 1951.  The  applicant
contends that he was injured by a Nazi SS Officer, who deliberately drove  a
tractor into the front of the military  jeep  he  was  riding  in  while  on
official Air  Force  business.   In  support  of  his  request,  he  submits
correspondence from 1951 and 1956 concerning a recommendation to  award  him
the PH for injuries he sustained.  However, these documents  are  considered
invalid since they are unsigned.  More  importantly,  he  has  not  provided
statements from any eyewitnesses.  Should  he  provide  such  evidence,  the
Board would  reconsider  his  request.   The  personal  sacrifice  applicant
endured for his country is noted and our decision in no way  diminishes  the
high regard we have  for  his  service;  however,  insufficient  documentary
evidence has been presented  to  warrant  awarding  him  the  Purple  Heart.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence  that  he  was  injured  as  a  direct
result of enemy action, we find no compelling basis  to  recommend  granting
the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2005-01155
in Executive Session on 13 July 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Wallace F. Beard, Jr., Member
                 Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Mar 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 16 May 05.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 May 05.
    Exhibit E.  Letters, Applicant, dated 6 & 18 Jun 05, w/atchs.




                                   JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-01155-2

    Original file (BC-2005-01155-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a letter to the Secretary of the Air Force, dated 24 February 2006, the applicant requested reconsideration of his request; however, on 20 March 2006, he was advised that his request did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board (Exhibits I and J). The AFRBA Senior Legal Advisor opinion, with attachment, is at Exhibit P. AFPC/DPPPR has reevaluated the evidence of record and the documentation provided by applicant, and still supports the 2005 AFPHRB decision to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03634

    Original file (BC-2002-03634.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    They got the injured passenger up the incline and to the road. From the letter addressed to the applicant on 1 February 1952, providing a copy of GO-50, awarding the 1st Air Postal Squadron a unit award, the letter stating those individuals assigned to the unit during the inclusive period of the unit award, and the dates of the award and the date of his accident, we believe the applicant was stationed in Korea during the period June 1951-30 June 1952. Matter of fact, after all this time,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-00854

    Original file (BC-2003-00854.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00854 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: MR. BERNIE GAMBER VETERANS SERVICE OFC HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 AUGUST 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Award of the Purple Heart (PH) for injuries sustained while flying on a combat mission in the Pacific Theater on 15 June 1944. DPPPR indicates that an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00788

    Original file (BC-2005-00788.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this respect, we note that the Purple Heart (PH) is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions that required or received treatment by medical personnel. The applicant contends that his wounds were received in action; however, an entry in the his medical records indicates that on 8 December 1943, he was treated for a gunshot wound to his right leg that was incurred when he was accidentally shot by an Italian soldier. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02718

    Original file (BC-2003-02718.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02718 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: VFW HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. The HQ AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He contends that his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01465

    Original file (BC-2005-01465.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for the PH on 1 November 2005. Applicant’s personal statement is noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, to include his service medical records, we find no corroborative evidence to establish that he was treated for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action during a rocket attack on 28 February 1968. ________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03561

    Original file (BC-2003-03561.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    They indicated the Purple Heart (PH) is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to- hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bail out injuries, etc.). Since there is no evidence the applicant was in fact shot down by enemy action in Germany in 1943, or injured, and the injuries he may have suffered in an aircraft accident in Korea do not qualify for award of the Purple Heart Medal. The applicant contends he was injured in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04015

    Original file (BC-2003-04015.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the statement from the former POW, the majority of the Board is not persuaded the applicant was wounded as a direct result of enemy action. The applicant is a former Army Air Corps B-17, Flying Fortress, navigator who seeks award of the Purple Heart (PH) for wounds received during a bombing mission over Berlin, Germany, on 20 February 1944. The majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence to demonstrate that he was injured...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066308C070402

    Original file (2002066308C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She indicates that her uncle is asking that the records be corrected to show he was the driver of a jeep, and that his injury was combat related so that he may be awarded the PH. The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. However, based on the lack of supporting records and evidence to support his contention that the jeep accident he was involved in was combat related, it is regrettably compelled to deny his PH request.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2005-01155

    Original file (BC-2005-01155.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 March 2005, the Air Force Purple Heart Review Board (AFPHRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for the PH. On 13 July 2005, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request for the PH. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. On 30 November 2005, the applicant requested reconsideration of his request; however, on 15 December...