RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-
01045
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 SEPTEMBER 2006
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to
honorable and his name changed from “XXXX XX XXXXXX” to “XXXX XX
XXXXXX.”
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He served the full four years of his enlistment and was asked to
reenlist. He would like his first name changed due to an error on
his birth certificate.
He is a registered voter, has been married for 48 years, owns a
home, is a college graduate, a retired teacher, a deacon, and a
great grandfather.
In support of his request, applicant provided copies of his DD Form
214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United
States, Bachelor of Science Degree, and various forms of
identification. His complete submission is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The record reflects the applicant enlisted and served under the
name “XXXX X. XXXXXX.”
He enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 August 1951, for a
period of four years in the grade of private. His highest grade
held was airman third class (E-2).
Applicant’s character and efficiency ratings are as follows: 16-
24 Oct 51 - Excellent; 2 Nov, and 28-29 Nov 51 - Unknown; 20 Mar,
and 7-8 May 52 - Excellent; 8-10 Jun 52 - Unknown; 3 Feb and 8-11
Jun 53 - Very Good/Satisfactory; 6-17 Aug, 26-27 Oct 53 -
Excellent; 12 Nov 53 - Unknown; 8-10 Mar 54 - Excellent.
The record reflects applicant received the following punishments
under the Uniform Code of Military Justice:
On 6 Jan 54, Article 15, for violating a wing memorandum, by being
in a house of prostitution, an “Off Limit Area”; and for violating
a base regulation by remaining in Chinhae, Korea after 2200 hours,
on or about 1 Jan 54; punishment imposed was reduction in grade to
airman basic (E-1).
On 26 Oct 54, was tried and convicted by a Summary Court-Martial
for unauthorized departure from place of duty; punishment imposed
was restriction to base for 30 days.
On 4 May 55, Article 15, for failure to obey a lawful order of a
noncommissioned officer (NCO) and showing disrespect toward the NCO
and being arrogant when conversing with the NCO; punishment imposed
was reduction in grade to airman third class (E-2).
Applicant was discharged on 23 Aug 55, in the grade of airman third
class, under the provisions of AFR 39-10, for expiration of term of
service, with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge and
was transferred to the Air Force Reserve. He served a total of 4
years on active duty. He was discharged from the Air Force Reserve
on 31 Jul 59, for convenience of the Government.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and recommended denial.
They stated, in part, that based on the documentation on file in
the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation. The discharge was within the discretion of the
discharge authority. Additionally, the applicant provided no
evidence or identified any errors or injustices that occurred in
the discharge processing. He provided no facts warranting a change
to the character of service.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPFF advised the applicant that since his name change occurred
after his separation, his records properly reflect his name
relative to his period of service. Accordingly, since he has no
continuing affiliation with the Air Force as a Reserve member or
retiree, they are unable to amend his military records after the
fact. (Exhibit D)
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 2 May 05 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E).
On 2 Jun 05, the AFBCMR offered the applicant an opportunity to
provide information pertaining to his activities since leaving the
service. The applicant responded with a personal letter from his
wife of 49 years, a copy of his Final Assessment Report from the
Orange County Public Schools for the school year 1999-2000 (the
year he retired), his resume from 1989, a brief biography, and
certificates of recognition/membership subsequent to his discharge
from the Air Force. (Exhibit G).
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After careful
consideration of the available records, we found no evidence that
the applicant’s discharge was inappropriate or contrary to the
governing directives in effect at the time. Nevertheless, based on
the documentation submitted in support of his appeal, it appears
that he has been a responsible citizen and productive member of
society since leaving the service. Therefore, while we do not
condone the behavior which led to his discharge, we believe an
upgrade of the characterization of his service to honorable is
warranted on the basis of clemency. Accordingly, we recommend that
his records be corrected as indicated below.
4. With regard to his request to change his name in his records,
no evidence has been presented showing that the name he enlisted
and served under was in error. It appears that the applicant had
his name changed after his separation. Therefore, we find no basis
upon which to favorably consider this portion of his request.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 23 August 1955,
he was honorably discharged and issued an Honorable Discharge
Certificate.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2005-01045 in Executive Session on 21 July 2005, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Mr. Albert C. Ellett, Member
Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Mar 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 2 May 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPFF, dated 20 Apr 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 May 05.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 2 Jun 05.
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant’s wife, undated, w/atchs.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-01045
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to [APPLICANT], be corrected to show that on 23
August 1955, he was honorably discharged and issued an Honorable
Discharge Certificate.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
On 10 Aug 53, he was reduced to the grade of Airman 3rd Class under the provisions of Article 15, UCMJ, for failure to report at appointed time to his place of duty and making a false statement. On 25 Oct 54, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (DRB) examined and reviewed the applicant’s request for discharge upgrade and concluded that the evidence submitted was insufficient to warrant a change in the type or nature of his discharge, and accordingly denied his request (see Exhibit C). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00178
As for his request for an honorable discharge, we noted the post-service information he provided. The Board majority concludes the applicant’s service should not be characterized at the same level as those military members with unblemished service and this application should therefore be denied. The Board majority also voted to deny the applicant’s request to have his 1954 general discharge upgraded to honorable.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02764
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02764 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. He was credited with 3 years, 7 months, and 4 days active service (excludes 197 days of lost time due to three periods of confinement). They also noted applicant did not...
In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a letter of character reference from his pastor and deacon board; a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States and his Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Hearing record. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. He also states that when he was discharged, he was told that in six months his discharge would be upgraded.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03657
On 25 Oct 61, he was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve in the grade of airman third class. Therefore, based on the evidence of record, we find no error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of applicant's appeal, we do not believe the former service member has been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Jan 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00596
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00596 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. His sentence consisted of reduction to the grade of airman basic (AB/E-1), 30 days of confinement at hard labor and forfeiture of $30. On 8 Sep 59, the Air Force Discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00632
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 Jul 81, for a period of six years in the grade of airman basic. Applicant was discharged on 29 Nov 83, in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Misconduct-Pattern Discreditable Involvement with Military or Civil Authorities, and received an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. We find no evidence of error in this case...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00936 INDEX NUMBER:106.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Other facts surrounding his discharge from the Air Force are unknown inasmuch as the complete discharge correspondence is not available. Applicant submitted a brief summary of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00571
In response to the Board’s request, the FBI indicated they were unable to identify with an arrest record pertaining to the applicant on the basis of information furnished (Exhibit D). Additionally, the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in his discharge processing, nor did he provide any facts to support changing the character of his service. Although the applicant completed the term of his enlistment contract, we are aware that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01346
In response to the Board’s request, the FBI indicated they were unable to identify with an arrest record pertaining to the applicant on the basis of information furnished (Exhibit D). Additionally, the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in his discharge processing, nor did he provide any facts to support changing the character of his service. Although the applicant completed the term of his enlistment contract, we are aware that the...