RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02247
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He would like to draw Veterans Administration benefits.
In support of the appeal, applicant submitted a copy of his DD Form
214. Applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 12 December 1951 in the
grade of airman basic for a period of four years.
On 11 December 1952, applicant’s commander recommended appropriate
action be initiated under the provisions of AFR 39-17 to separate him
from the Air Force for unfitness. The basis for this action: (1)
Applicant possessed an antisocial personality manifested by repeated
acts of misconduct, inability to adapt to military service, poor sense
of responsibility and poor motivation for change of behavior pattern.
(2) Applicant’s failure to report to his proper place of duty at the
proper time on several occasions. (3) Absent without leave (AWOL) on
three different occasions (2 days - [20 June 1952 to 21 June 1952], 14
days - [9 July 1952 to 22 July 1952], and 13 days - [2 October 1952 to
14 October 1952]). (4) Applicant was AWOL since Board proceedings
were initiated and he was court-martial and confined at hard labor for
three months. (5) Applicant was counseled by his commanding officer
and first sergeant on several occasions.
On 19 February 1953, applicant was notified to appear before a Board
of Officers to determine whether he should be discharged under AFR 39-
17. The board convened on 20 February 1953 and recommended applicant
be discharged with an undesirable discharge. The discharge authority
approved the findings and recommendations of the Board of Officers and
directed that applicant be discharged with an undesirable discharge.
Applicant was separated from the Air Force on 19 May 1953 under the
provisions of AFR 39-17, Discharge of Airmen Because of Unfitness
(unfitness), with an undesirable discharge. He served 10 months and 9
days on active duty.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is
attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS states, based on the documentation on file in the master
personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural
and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The
discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority.
Therefore, they recommend denial of applicant’s request.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 29 October 2004, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. On 17
November 2004, applicant was invited to provide, within 14 days,
information pertaining to his activities since leaving the service.
On 30 November 2004, a copy of applicant’s FBI Report was forwarded
for review and response within 14 days. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. We find no impropriety in the characterization of applicant's
discharge. It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate
standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive
evidence that pertinent regulations were violated or that applicant
was not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the time of
discharge. We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings
were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to
the existing circumstances.
4. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation
that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. In view of
the contents of the FBI Identification Record we are not persuaded
that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge warrants an
upgrade on the basis of clemency. Having found no error or injustice
with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a
military member, we conclude that no basis exists to favorably
consider his request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 1 March 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Panel Chair
Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Sep 04, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 22 Oct 04.
Exhibit E. Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 04, AFBCMR,
dated 17 and 30 Nov 04.
CHARLES E. BENNETT
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01465
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01465 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 29 October 1953, the discharge authority approved the separation recommended by the Board of Officers and directed that applicant be discharged with an undesirable discharge. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01010 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03760
Based on the available documentation the following facts are provided. Now he would like to upgrade his service record. Applicant's complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. Applicant provided a statement in regards to his FBI Report stating after 1961 he found a good job and has straightened his life out.
For this incident, he was ordered to be restricted to the limits of his squadron area for a period of sixty (60) days and to forfeit fifty dollars ($50) of his pay. On 19 November 1954, 3 August 1955 and 23 June 1958, the Air Force Discharge Review Board considered and denied the applicant’s requests for a discharge upgrade. On 12 July 2002, a letter from Congressman Markey’s office requesting assistance in upgrading applicant’s discharge was received by this office (Exhibit G).
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01255
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 3 February 1951, the former member enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age of 18 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of four (4) years. On 12 December 1955, the former member submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFRDB) requesting his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ The...
On 19 February 1954, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-17 (Unfitness), with an undesirable discharge. We note that the applicant provided some character references pertaining to his post-service activities; however, the Board does not believe this evidence is sufficient to warrant clemency. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 5 December 2001, under...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03923
In support of her request, the applicant has submitted a copy of her late husband’s death certificate, and a copy of a letter from the National Personnel Records Center dated 12 November 2003. Applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors in the discharge processing, nor provide facts that support upgrading the discharge to honorable (Exhibit C). Novel, Panel Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Nov 03, with attachments.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02506
On 9 October 1979, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling regarding his job performance. On 17 December 1979, he was discharged under honorable conditions under the provisions of AFR 39-12 (Unsuitable - Personality Disorder). After careful consideration of the applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we see no evidence that would warrant an upgrade of his discharge to honorable.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03100
Applicant's submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The applicant was discharged from the Air Force on 8 November 1954 under the provisions of AFR 39-17 (unfitness) with an undesirable discharge. Second, he went AWOL one time for 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01109
For this incident, he was tried and convicted by a summary court-martial and sentenced to be confined to hard labor for 26 days, and to forfeit $50.00. On 28 December 1979, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFRDB) requesting his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Additionally, the applicant did not submit any evidence, identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, or provide any facts warranting a...