RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01708
COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 NOV 2005
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her administrative discharge from the Air Force Reserve be set aside
and she be awarded a medical retirement.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She has been granted 60% disability from the Department of Veterans
Affairs due to physical disqualification.
In support of her appeal the applicant has provided a personal letter,
her discharge package, copies of a rating decision from the Department
of Veterans Affairs (DVA) and medical records.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve in 1987 and was
progressively promoted to the grade of master sergeant with an
effective date and date of rank of 1 November 1997.
A Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) convened on 6 November 1999 and
noted that her private medical doctor because of frequent episodes of
wheezing diagnosed her with Bronchial Asthma on 2 March 1991. She was
on an inhaled steroid, Vanceril-2 puffs, three times a day and needed
Albuterol every 2-3 hours daily for 4-5 years. In 1993 she was
hospitalized for 4 days (19 April to 23 April) for acute asthma
exacerbation, non-responsive to emergency room management. She was
readmitted (1 February to 3 February 1994) for a similar
exacerbation. Both times she was placed on a tapering Prednisone
regimen. Her condition had improved the last 5 years necessitating
only Albutgerol use 2-3 times a week. Recently the condition had
exacerbated requiring more bronchi-dilator use.
The PEB concluded that she had a long-standing history of asthma with
1 episode requiring hospitalization for 4 days and another for 3 days.
She has been on chronic inhaled steroid and broncho-dilator therapy.
The diagnosis is unequivocal. Her constant requirement for broncho-
dilators and inability to identify precipitants necessitate
disqualification from worldwide duty.
The remaining pertinent medical facts are contained in the evaluation
prepared by the BCMR Medical Consultant at Exhibit C.
On 18 August 2000, she was administratively discharged for medical
disqualification due to asthma after 12 years of satisfactory service.
On 16 April 2003, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated the
applicant with a 60 percent disability rating for asthma.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommended denial and stated that based
on the preponderance of evidence and accepted medical principles, the
reviewer concludes that the applicant's asthma was not proximately
caused by military service and was not permanently aggravated by
military service. Action and disposition in this case are proper and
equitable reflecting compliance with Air Force directives that
implement the law.
BCMR Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 3
February 2005 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case to
include her contention that the DVA's decision to award her an overall
combined compensable disability rating of 60% substantiates that her
conditions warrant a medical retirement from the Air Force; however,
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the BCMR Medical
Consultant’s and adopt his rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to find that the disability rating assigned at the
time of final disposition in this case was erroneous or unjust.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with her application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-01708 in Executive Session on 26 April 2005 under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 May 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 2 Feb 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Feb 05.
B. J. WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00179
It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.Both the FPEB and the VA rated asthma condition,under code 6620, asthma, bronchial, IAW §4.97 but at different rating levels; the FPEB rated 10%citing intermittent use of medication; and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01757
The IPEB reviewed his case and found the member fit and recommended, "Return to Duty." BCMR Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and stated he sought a second opinion by pulmonologist in December 2005 and was diagnosed with asthma after having below normal pulmonary function tests. In this respect, the Board notes...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-01757
The IPEB reviewed his case and found the member fit and recommended, "Return to Duty." BCMR Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and stated he sought a second opinion by pulmonologist in December 2005 and was diagnosed with asthma after having below normal pulmonary function tests. In this respect, the Board notes...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03839
On 6 May 2004, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) performed a fitness determination only, concluding the applicant was unfit for continued military duty due to asthma. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The DPPD evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01947
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPD recommends the application be denied, and states, in part the applicant was processed through the Disability Evaluation System (DES) and was found unfit for continued military service based on asthma which existed prior to service. The applicant contends the determination that her asthma existed prior to her service was solely based on the single sentence in the MEB that she reported using an...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02522
The rating for the unfitting asthma condition is addressed below. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bronchial Asthma6699-660210%Asthma6602100%20070531Other x 1 (Not in Scope)Other x 5 Combined: 10%Combined: 100% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060801 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS)) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board also acknowledges the CI’s contention that suggests a higher service rating should have been granted on the unfitting medical...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00738
Records from pre-TDRL, through TDRL, and post-separation VA records all indicate that the CI required and used daily inhalational bronchodilator and/or anti-inflammatory medications which would support a minimum 30% rating IAW disability code 6602. In the matter of the Asthma condition, the Board unanimously recommends no change to the original 30% rating for entry into the TDRL period; and a permanent separation rating (following TDRL) of 60% coded 6602 IAW VASRD §4.97. I concur with that...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01959
SEPARATION DATE: 20021002 The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. The allergist noted that despite daily use of BD and steroid inhalers symptoms remained.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01963
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board next considered that at the time of separation, although the CI’s asthma was relatively well controlled,treatment notes in the STR, the MEB and C&P exams consistently documented use of the anti-inflammatory inhaler and oral bronchodilator medications, with...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02350
The CI was prescribed a combined steroid (Advair) and BD inhaler twice daily and follow-up PFT in three months was recommended.A follow up PC visit 29 March 2004 noted that the CI had no symptoms and was not using the BD inhaler “at all.”At the MEB exam 29 March 2004, the CI reported asthma, denied any SOB or chest tightness, but still had occasional coughing spells.The medications list included Advair twice daily “started today.” The MEB physical exam noted a normal lung exam. However, a...