RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-
02926
INDEX CODE: 128.00
COUNSEL: JOHN E.
HOWELL
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 OCTOBER 2006
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His deceased father’s service records be corrected to show that he
is the eligible beneficiary of his father’s death gratuity pay,
travel bonds and insurance.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He is the rightful beneficiary of his father’s death gratuity pay.
The death gratuity, insurance and travel insurance were never paid
to the children. The unused leave and money was paid to his
father’s sister, xxxxxx xxxxxxxx. It should have been paid to the
children.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The former service member served in the U.S. Army from 9 Jan 41 to
8 Aug 45. His highest grade held was private. He served in the
Air Corps from 13 Feb 46 to 10 Feb 47.
He enlisted in the Army Air Forces on 8 Oct 47, in the grade of
private first class, for a period of three years. On 21 Jun 48,
the former member was killed in an automobile accident.
The Enlistment Record, WD AGO Form 21, executed by the former
servicemember on 6 Oct 47, listed his mother as his nearest
relative to be notified in case of emergency. His designation of
beneficiary listed his wife, xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxx, address unknown, as
the first beneficiary, then his mother and sister. The former
member also signed a statement in Section 19 of his enlistment
contract that he desired no insurance.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPFC reviewed this application and stated, in part,
official records obtained from the National Personnel Records
Center (NPRC) confirm that at the time of the service member’s
death, he was survived by a legal spouse, who would have been the
recipient of the death gratuity payment. Therefore, no death
gratuity payment would be authorized to a surviving child.
Information about any potential life insurance can be obtained by
writing to the Veteran Administration Life Insurance Center, P.O.
Box 8079, Philadelphia, PA 19101. They are unfamiliar with the
term “travel bonds” and are unable to address that portion of the
application.
Title 10, U.S.C., Section 1477 states, “A death gratuity payable
upon the death of a person covered by section 1475 or 1476 of this
title shall be paid to or for the living survivor highest on the
following list: (1) His surviving spouse; (2) His children, as
prescribed by subsection (b), in equal shares; (3) If designated by
him, any one or more of the following persons: (A) His parents or
persons in loco parentis, as prescribed by subsection (c), (B) His
brothers and (C) His sisters.”
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In his response, applicant states that if the spouse was xxxxxx, he
has proof that she was not the legal wife because his father’s
divorce from xxxxxxxxxx was not final at that time. He further
contends that xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx was not the proper next-of-kin, in
1948, when the Air Force gave her the unused leave and money.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. After careful consideration of applicant’s request and the
available evidence of record, we found insufficient relevant
evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of
probable error or injustice. Based upon the presumption of
regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs and without
evidence to the contrary, we must assume that payment of his
father’s death gratuity was made to the proper designated
beneficiary. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider his
request.
4. With respect to any potential life insurance, we note the
office of primary responsibility suggests that the applicant
contact the Veterans Administration Life Insurance Center, PO Box
8079, Philadelphia PA 19101 on this matter. Additionally, we are
unaware of the “travel bonds” the applicant is referring to and are
therefore unable to respond to this portion of his request.
5. The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-
02926 in Executive Session on 3 August 2005, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Rita S. Looney, Panel Chair
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Apr 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPFC, dated 11 May 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 May 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 17 May 05.
RITA S. LOONEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2003-02926-2
They stated, in part, that they believe the applicant’s father was in fact lawfully married to his wife, ----- --------, and the payment of the death gratuity to his wife, ------, was proper. Since ----- ------ identified ------ as his wife on his enlistment paperwork in 1947, two years later, they can safely assume he did in fact hold out --------- to be his wife, and that they lived together as husband and wife. Exhibit H. Letter, HQ USAF/JAA, dated 7 Dec 05, w/atchs.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020846
The applicant states: a. Her position is that when the law states "only," anything outside of that is an invalid designation to be paid out by law. The FSM designated 25% of the death gratuity to two organizations.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00678
Under this provision of law, the applicant is not eligible for additional SGLI gratuity payment since her son was not on active duty at the time of his death. DPPD’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant contends she wrote many letters to Congress advocating retroactive death benefits be extended to all those who died on active duty since 7 October 2001; not just those who...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000752
The applicant requests through her counsel, in effect, reconsideration of the request for correction of the records of her deceased brother, a former service member (FSM), to show the FSM enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), Option B (Deferred Annuity), naming her as a natural person with an insurable interest. The applicant's request and her counsel's argument for reconsideration of the request for correction of the records of the FSM to show that he enrolled in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000752
The applicant requests through her counsel, in effect, reconsideration of the request for correction of the records of her deceased brother, a former service member (FSM), to show the FSM enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), Option B (Deferred Annuity), naming her as a natural person with an insurable interest. The applicant's request and her counsel's argument for reconsideration of the request for correction of the records of the FSM to show that he enrolled in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018524
The applicant requests the records of her deceased son, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he remained on active duty on the date of death rather than placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL). In no case shall a Service member be retired after his or her death or before completion of a required line of duty determination. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 (Public Law 107-107), dated 28 December 2001, and codified at Title...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711274
DD Form 41, Record of Emergency Date, dated 7 October 1992, shows the FSM as divorced, the two youngest children as residing with their mother. The applicant is listed as the FSM’s spouse. The opinion noted that, based upon lack of evidence that the FSM intended to deny his former spouse the benefit, and considering the nature of his relationship with his former spouse until his death as attested to by statements from the applicant and the FSM’s children, it is reasonable to change the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028902
g. The applicant provides a timeline summarizing the events, as follows: * 3 April 2010 applicant and FSM married * 19 April 2010 FSM's SRP packet completed, including a DD Form 93 designating the applicant as primary beneficiary for the DG, burial expenses, unpaid P&A, and PADD of the FSM's remains * 4 June 2010 FSM deployed to Afghanistan * 16 September 2010 FSM died in combat in southern Afghanistan * 17 September 2010 FSM's commanding officer and battalion S-1 indicate FSM...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00700
In the event the Board grants relief, neither his son's eligibility for SBP payments, nor the amount would be affected unless the former member's death was determined to not be ILOD. Under this provision of the law the former member’s son is not eligible for the additional SGLI gratuity payment since he was not on active duty at the time of his death. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100383C070208
Robert L. Duecaster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that the Department of the Army or the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) provide her retroactive survival benefits from 1973 until March 2001. The election form (VA Form 29-8286 or SGLV 8286) signed by the FSM, which is in his official records, is the official document used in the settlement and payment of the...