RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02136
INDEX CODE: 110.02
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His general discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He wants to rejoin the Air Force to help the country in the fight against
terrorism.
In support of his application, he provided a personal statement,
documentation of his personal achievements, and character references. A
copy of the applicant’s complete submission with attachments is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 13 June 1980, the applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve at the age of
17. On 25 April 1982, he was honorably discharged from the Army Reserve
for completion of required service. He served 1 year, 5 months, and 13
days in the Army Reserve of which five months and three days were credited
as active duty. On 26 April 1982, the applicant enlisted in the Regular
Air Force at the age of 19 in the grade of airman (E-2) for a period of
four years. While in the Air Force, the applicant was progressively
promoted to the grade of sergeant (E-4), effective and with a date of rank
of 22 January 1986. He received five enlisted performance reports from the
period 26 April 1982 to 2 October 1986 with overall ratings of 9, 9, 8, 8,
and 7.
The applicant’s disciplinary record includes numerous administrative
counselings and reprimands for a variety of infractions including
dereliction, failure to go, bad debts, and driving without insurance.
Additionally, the applicant’s driving privileges were revoked following a
British civil court conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI). He was
entered into the Alcohol Rehabilitation Program but due to excess no-shows,
failed in that program. The applicant’s Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO)
status was vacated on 21 May 1986 as a result of his DWI conviction.
On 17 November 1986, his commander notified the applicant that he was
recommending him for a general discharge under AFM 39-10, Chapter 5,
Section H, paragraph 5-47a, for a pattern of misconduct. The applicant
acknowledged receipt and consulted appointed counsel. On 18 November 1986,
the applicant waived his right to submit statements in his own behalf. On
21 November 1986, the applicant received nonjudicial punishment for
disorderly conduct. His punishment consisted of reduction in rank to
airman basic (E-1) with a date of rank of 21 November 1986 and 45 days
extra duty. On 24 November 1986, the staff judge advocate found the
discharge file legally sufficient and recommended a general discharge
without probation and rehabilitation. On 1 December 1986, the discharge
authority approved the recommended separation and directed that the
applicant be discharged with a general (under honorable conditions)
discharge. On 3 December 1986, the discharge recommendation was amended to
include the applicant’s prior Army Reserve service. The applicant
acknowledged receipt and offered a conditional waiver of his right to a
board hearing based on his receipt of no less than a general discharge. On
8 December 1986, the acting staff judge advocate found the file legally
sufficient and recommended the applicant’s conditional waiver be accepted
and that he be separated with a general discharge without probation and
rehabilitation. On 12 December 1986, the discharge authority approved the
discharge with a general characterization of service under the provisions
of AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-47a.
The applicant was separated with a general (under honorable conditions)
discharge on 19 December 1986 with a separation code of HKA (misconduct-
pattern discreditable involvement with military or civil authorities) and a
reenlistment code of 2B (discharged under general or other-than-honorable
conditions). He had served a total of five years and four days on active
duty.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the FBI indicated that on the basis of the
data furnished, they were unable to locate an arrest record pertaining to
the applicant.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS states the applicant’s discharge was
consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the
discharge regulation in affect at that time. Additionally, the discharge
was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant did
not provide any facts warranting a change in his discharge, nor did he
submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred
in his discharge processing. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant states his appeal is not about there being an injustice done
to him. He admits he made some stupid mistakes and brought the whole
thing upon himself. He was young and immature and felt he was being too
severely punished for a DWI, so he requested his release from active duty.
When authorities responded that there was not enough cause to initiate an
AFR 39-10 discharge against him, he purposely gave them the incidents they
needed to proceed by skipping Social Actions appointments, late payments
on accounts, etc. He has changed over the years and he wants the chance
to correct his mistakes. He was a good troop who got off track and
temporarily let alcohol ruin his career. All he is asking for is a second
chance.
On 19 August 2004, the applicant was given the opportunity to submit
comments about his post service activities. The applicant provided
additional documentation of his personal achievements along with several
character references. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence
of record we see no evidence to show that the applicant’s discharge was
erroneous or unjust. Nevertheless, after reviewing the applicant’s
submission, we are of the opinion that the applicant has provided
sufficient evidence to lead us to conclude that he has led a stable and
productive life without any subsequent serious involvement of a derogatory
nature since his separation from the Air Force. In view of these factors
and in consideration of the applicant’s apparent immaturity at the time of
his enlistment, we believe an upgrade of his discharge to honorable is
warranted. Accordingly, we recommend that his records be corrected as
indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 19 December 1986, he was
honorably discharged with a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C
(involuntary separation with honorable discharge) and was furnished an
Honorable Discharge certificate.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 14 October 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-02136
was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Jul,04 with atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 28 Jul 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Jul 04.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Rebuttal, dated 28 Aug 03
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 19 Aug 04.
Exhibit G. Applicant’s Letter, dtd 27 Aug 04, with atchs.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-02136
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that on 19
December 1986, he was honorably discharged with a reenlistment eligibility
(RE) code of 2C (involuntary separation with honorable discharge) and was
furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02136
On 2 July 1984, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was being recommended for discharge under the provisions of Air Force Regulation (AFR) 39-10, Unsatisfactory Performance. The commander recommended the applicant receive a general (under honorable conditions) discharge based on the following: (1) On 27 November 1981, he received a Letter of Reprimand for being 3 hours late for work. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00933
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00933 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to a “1” category and his narrative reason for separation be changed to allow him to join the Air Force Reserves. On 29 April 1985, the applicant submitted an application to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02136
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02136 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge for fraudulent enlistment be set aside and he receive active duty credit for an honorable discharge. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03089
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03089 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 5 October 1982, the applicant received notification that he was being recommended for discharge due to his failure to perform assigned duties properly. The...
A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record is appended at Exhibit C. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, stated that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation at the time of his discharge from...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01036
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01036 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable to allow him to serve in the South Carolina National Guard during this time of conflict. Applicant was discharged on 18 June 1986, in the grade of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01870
On 13 April 1986, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (DRB) requesting his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. The DRB upgraded his discharge to honorable, but on 21 May 1987, the Secretary of the Air Force, based on a recommendation from the Air Force Personnel Board denied his request for a change of RE code. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01983
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01983 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02163
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02163 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. However, he has provided no evidence showing his discharge was improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation at the time it was...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01698
On 25 September 1974, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade of sergeant (E-4) for a period of 4 years. On 4 June 1987, the applicant’s commander notified the applicant he was considering the imposition of nonjudicial punishment on him under Article 15, UCMJ for wrongful use of marijuana on or about 13 April 1987. On 23 September 1987, after consulting legal counsel, applicant submitted a conditional waiver of the rights associated with an administrative discharge...