RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01655
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: DVA
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal and the Bronze Star (BS)
Medal.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was wounded in a German bomb attack at Leige, Belgium on 5 January
1945. He claims entitlement to the BS Medal, which he claims to have
been awarded in 1944.
In support of his request, applicant submits a personal statement, a
copy of WD AGO Form 52-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation
Honorable Discharge, and copies of letters relating to his service.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The former member’s military personnel records were destroyed by fire
in 1973. The available records reflect the member enlisted in the
Army Air Corps on 10 July 1941, and separated on 30 November 1945.
Member’s records show he served during World War II, with tours in
Normandy, Northern France, Rhineland, and the Air Offensive in Europe.
He served 4 years, 4 months and 21 days of active military service.
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,
reflects award of the Air Force Good Conduct Medal, with Clasp, the
American Defense Service Medal, the Distinguished Unit Badge, the
European-African Middle Eastern Service Medal, and the American
Theater Service Ribbon.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPR recommended the applicant's request be denied. The
applicant did not provide any supporting documentation to substantiate
his claim for the PH Medal or the BS Medal. He declares that while he
was assigned in Leige, Belgium between October 1944 and January 1945,
he was wounded and evacuated to a military hospital in London.
Applicant did not provide any documentation to support his claim and
they did not find any conclusive evidence such as a citation or
general order that would verify his entitlements to the BS Medal.
The DPPPR evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Counsel states that applicant has provided evidence of his wounds in
World War II by enemy action. This was the baseline requirement for
award of the PH Medal. He also provided evidence of award of the BS
Medal, which was not recorded because of loss, inadvertence, or
incompetence by higher command, a common occurrence during combat
actions in highly fluid unit movement situations.
In additional support of his appeal, his Counsel has provided a copy
of a clinical report.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, we are
not persuaded that he should be awarded the PH Medal or the BS Medal.
In this respect, we note the BS Medal is awarded for heroism,
meritorious achievement, or service, not involving participation in
aerial flight, in connection with military operations against an armed
enemy. The evidence provided does not to show the applicant committed
a heroic act, was recognized for meritorious achievement, or that he
was officially recommended for award of the BS Medal. In regards to
the applicant’s request for award of the PH Medal, there was no
evidence presented, other than his own assertions, which would lead us
to believe that he was medically treated for any wounds incurred as a
direct result of enemy fire. The clinical report and the letters
pertaining to the money order do not reveal the sufficient information
to justify awarding the PH Medal. Should the applicant secure
documentation in support of his assertion in the form of statements of
possible witnesses to the events under review; or, evidence from his
medical records indicating the presence of wounds or scars, which
could have been the result of injuries he indicates he suffered, the
Board would reconsider his request for the PH medal. Therefore, we
find no compelling basis to warrant favorable consideration of the
relief sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that
the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence no considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-
01655 in Executive Session on 14 September 2004, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Panel Chair
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 May 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, undated.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Jul 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, DVA, dated 22 Jul 04, w/atchs.
OLGA M. CRERAR
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03304
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that applicant has provided no medical evidence showing that he was injured while a POW, and there is no evidence in his military medical records to indicate he was injured while a POW. Additionally, in 1988, the Veterans Administration determined the evidence of record did not show right ankle or right knee injuries. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01716
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01716 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he received an Oak Leaf Cluster to the Purple Heart (PH) for being a prisoner of war (POW). DPPPR further states the applicant has not provided any documentation to show he was injured or wounded...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01120
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the PH medal. There is no evidence in the applicant’s records that he sustained injuries or beatings. After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, the board was not persuaded that he should be awarded the Purple Heart Medal.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-03616
Furthermore, his medical records indicate that he had an operation. Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the DFC and states, in part, that there is no evidence he was recommended for, or awarded the DFC. Should the applicant provide additional statements containing specific details regarding his...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03059
The applicant is unable to provide any documentation showing that he received an injury as a direct result of enemy action that required medical treatment, that he received any medical treatment at the time or later, or an eyewitness account by an individual who witnessed the injury occur. He has provided seven excerpts from his VA medical records from 1988 that show he claimed injury to his left ankle. Exhibit E. Letter from Applicant, dated 29 Mar 03, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03059
The applicant is unable to provide any documentation showing that he received an injury as a direct result of enemy action that required medical treatment, that he received any medical treatment at the time or later, or an eyewitness account by an individual who witnessed the injury occur. He has provided seven excerpts from his VA medical records from 1988 that show he claimed injury to his left ankle. Exhibit E. Letter from Applicant, dated 29 Mar 03, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-03224
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the PH medal. AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the PH medal. The applicant has not provided any documentation or corroborating evidence that he suffered any injuries or wounds while a POW in Germany.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03484
The HQ AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 23 April 2004 for review and response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02676
The applicant states although his wounds were treated by medical personnel at an Air Evacuation Hospital in Belgium, by the time they had returned to their home base in England his wound had healed nicely and no entry documenting his wound was made in his records. Should he provide more information regarding the circumstances surrounding his injury, the Board would entertain reconsideration of his request; however, based on the evidence presented, a majority of the Board finds insufficient...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-02825
DPPPR states that there is no medical documentation showing that the applicant received any wounds or injuries and he did not provide any. His case was denied by the PH Review Board on 22 Oct 03 because of the lack of clear-cut information and documentation showing he was wounded by the enemy and received medical treatment for a wound. Through his Congressman, applicant requested additional time to provide a response to the Air Force evaluation.