RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03059
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS:
Award of the Purple Heart Medal.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
As a German Prisoner of War (POW), no record of his ankle injury was
recorded in official records. A change in Public Law authorizes award of
the Purple Heart.
In support of his request, applicant submits a personal statement, a
statement from a flight crewmember and additional documents associated with
the issues cited in his contentions. The applicant’s complete submission,
with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 10 Nov 43.
The applicant’s Enlisted Record and Report of Separation reveals that he
participated in the European Theater of Operation (ETO) during the period
13 Sep 44 through 15 May 45. He was awarded the Air Medal with 2 Oak Leaf
Clusters, European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal with 1 Silver and
1 Bronze Service Star, American Campaign Medal, Distinguished Unit Citation
and American Campaign Medal. The POW Medal and the World War II Victory
Medal have subsequently been added. On 30 Oct 45, he was honorably
discharged for the convenience of the government (Demobilization) from the
Army Air Corps. The applicant was serving in the grade of staff sergeant
(E-5) and had completed a total of 1 year, 2 months and 10 days of
continental service and 9 months and 14 days of foreign service at the time
of discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied. DPPPR stated that the
applicant was a POW during the period 12 Mar 45 - 29 Apr 45. In response
to DPPPR’s letter of 2 Jan 03, the applicant indicated that he injured his
left ankle from a parachute landing on 12 Mar 45 when he was taken POW by
the Germans. He returned to the U.S. on 30 May 45 and was not demobilized
until 30 Oct 45. His Report of Separation shows no wounds were received in
action.
DPPPR states that the applicant has not provided the necessary
documentation to substantiate his claim that he injured his ankle when
parachuting from an aircraft on 12 Mar 45. No one saw him receive an
injury since the crewmembers did not see him until the day after bailing
out of the aircraft. The applicant’s records were destroyed in the 1973
fire at the National Personnel Records Center; therefore, no military
medical records are available. The only medical records available are
those from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). The first time the
applicant was seen at a DVA Medical Center was in 1988 and his ankles were
considered normal at that time. The information the applicant submitted
from the Purple Heart Organization Web Site, including the Public Law 104-
106, dated 10 Feb 96, pertains to POWs who were injured or wounded prior to
the Vietnam Conflict. None of the documentation pertains to his alleged
injury. The applicant is unable to provide any documentation showing that
he received an injury as a direct result of enemy action that required
medical treatment, that he received any medical treatment at the time or
later, or an eyewitness account by an individual who witnessed the injury
occur. The HQ AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and indicated that he was under
the impression during WWII that the criterion for the Purple Heart (PH) was
a wound that drew blood or was fatal. He recently learned, through the
Internet site, that injuries during parachute jumps involving enemy action
were considered an eligibility criterion. The injury of his left ankle,
and the related left knee, have troubled him since WWII. He has provided
seven excerpts from his VA medical records from 1988 that show he claimed
injury to his left ankle. In the 1950s, while experiencing pain in his
ankle and knee, his civilian physician told him to take aspirin, which was
the treatment for arthritis at that time. No individual in the crew saw or
had knowledge of the fate or experiences of any other crewmember. The
first opportunity to compare notes between those captured and those
reaching the Russians was after returning to the states. He submitted a
letter to verify his claim, written by the ball turret gunner to the pilot.
This letter was written in 1945 while the ball turret gunner was in the
hospital recovering from his injuries and contains an account of his
(applicant’s) condition when he was first united with the crew members.
Since it was written at a time long before he had his claim, and it was by
a third party, he was sure it would be acceptable proof; however, it was
dismissed out of hand. The Nazis did not give any medical treatment and by
the time he was released, his ankle had healed. A complete copy of this
response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of applicant’s
submission and the supporting documentation he provided, we are unpersuaded
that he should be awarded the Purple Heart. In our opinion, the available
evidence does not substantiate that the applicant’s ankle injury was the
direct result of enemy action that required medical treatment as a result
of parachuting from an aircraft on 12 Mar 45. Should the applicant secure
further medical documentation to substantiate an ankle injury that fused
itself over time without medical intervention, the Board may be willing to
reconsider his application. Without convincing evidence to support his
contentions, we are in agreement with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force office of responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the
basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden
that he has suffered either an error or an injustice. We do not wish to
deprive the applicant of an award to which he is entitled; however, based
on the evidence before us, we have no recourse but to conclude that his
request for the Purple Heart should be denied at this time.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 10 Apr 03, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Panel Chair
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
Ms. Cheryl Jacobson, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2002-03059.
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Aug 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 19 Feb 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Feb 03.
Exhibit E. Letter from Applicant, dated 29 Mar 03, w/atchs.
OLGA M. CRERAR
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03059
The applicant is unable to provide any documentation showing that he received an injury as a direct result of enemy action that required medical treatment, that he received any medical treatment at the time or later, or an eyewitness account by an individual who witnessed the injury occur. He has provided seven excerpts from his VA medical records from 1988 that show he claimed injury to his left ankle. Exhibit E. Letter from Applicant, dated 29 Mar 03, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03304
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that applicant has provided no medical evidence showing that he was injured while a POW, and there is no evidence in his military medical records to indicate he was injured while a POW. Additionally, in 1988, the Veterans Administration determined the evidence of record did not show right ankle or right knee injuries. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02265
There is no evidence in his reconstructed limited military records to support he was injured as a direct result of enemy action. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Should he respond with evidence of...
The applicant has not provided any documentation showing that he received medical treatment for either injury and there is no documentation in his medical file mentioning either of these injuries. Therefore, we conclude that any doubt should be resolved in this applicant’s favor and recommend he be awarded the PH for injuries sustained after bailing out of his B-24 bomber on 9 Feb 45. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 31 Jul 02, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00937
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR advises that, to be awarded the PH, a member must provide detailed evidence/documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and received treatment by medical personnel. By the time he was liberated from the POW camp nine months later, his wounds had healed and no further treatment was necessary. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 13 Jun 04, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01716
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01716 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he received an Oak Leaf Cluster to the Purple Heart (PH) for being a prisoner of war (POW). DPPPR further states the applicant has not provided any documentation to show he was injured or wounded...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01675
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01675 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for an injury he sustained when his aircraft was shot down on 4 Aug 44, and any other awards to which he may be entitled. His available records reflect he enlisted in the Army on...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-03224
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the PH medal. AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the PH medal. The applicant has not provided any documentation or corroborating evidence that he suffered any injuries or wounds while a POW in Germany.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-03616
Furthermore, his medical records indicate that he had an operation. Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the DFC and states, in part, that there is no evidence he was recommended for, or awarded the DFC. Should the applicant provide additional statements containing specific details regarding his...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04015
After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the statement from the former POW, the majority of the Board is not persuaded the applicant was wounded as a direct result of enemy action. The applicant is a former Army Air Corps B-17, Flying Fortress, navigator who seeks award of the Purple Heart (PH) for wounds received during a bombing mission over Berlin, Germany, on 20 February 1944. The majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence to demonstrate that he was injured...