Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01111
Original file (BC-2004-01111.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01111
                                       INDEX CODE:  128.05, 128.10
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX               COUNSEL: NONE

      XXXXXXXXXXXX                           HEARING DESIRED:  NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for  reenlisting  into
an undermanned career field.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He would have been eligible for an SRB upon his original enlistment  date
of  11  December  2002.   His  military  personnel  office  reenlistments
section, and a person from the Air Force Personnel Center,  informed  him
that he was overlooked for the SRB and there  was  nothing  he  could  do
about it.  From his calculations the SRB owed him from his 18  June  2002
reenlistment date is $15,225.75.

In  support  of  his  application,  the  applicant  submits  a   personal
statement, copies of documentation surrounding his  reenlistment,  a  pay
chart dated 1 January 2002, and instructions  on  calculating  SRB.   The
applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 24 September 1993, the applicant contracted his initial enlistment  in
the Regular Air Force at the age of 18 in the grade of airman basic for a
period of four years.   Following  his  successful  completion  of  basic
military and technical training, the applicant was assigned to duties  as
a Avionics Guidance and Control System Apprentice.  He was  progressively
promoted to the grade of staff sergeant effective and with a date of rank
of 1 September 2001.  The applicant entered his most recent enlistment on
18 June 2002, when he reenlisted for five years and five  months  in  the
Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 2A152.  Prior to this  enlistment,  based
on a previously established service obligation,  he  had  an  established
date of separation 11 December 2002.  He was selected for  an  assignment
as a Fighter/Heavy Avionics Instructor with a duty effective  date  of  1
October 2002.  His projected date of separation is 17 November 2007.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAE recommends the applicant’s request be  denied.   DPPAE  states
that according  to  the  17  January  2002  Supplemental  SRB  List,  the
applicant’s AFSC, 2A152, was  not  authorized  an  SRB.   The  AFPC/DPPAE
evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant  on  28
May 2004, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this  date,  this
office has received no response.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice.  We note  the  applicant’s  assertion
that he should have been given an SRB for reenlisting into an undermanned
career field; however, he has not provided any evidence  showing  he  was
entitled to an SRB under either  of  his  AFSCs,  2A1X2  or  2A0X1B.   In
addition, the applicant’s record does not reveal any evidence that  would
lead us to believe that the action to require him to obtain retainability
in June 2002  was  erroneous  or  unjust  or  that  he  was  treated  any
differently from other similarly situated members.  Therefore,  we  agree
with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our  conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.
Accordingly, the applicant’s request is not favorably considered.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will  only
be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence
not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following  members  of  the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 11 August 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                 Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
                 Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-01111
was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Mar 04.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 17 May 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 May 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01201

    Original file (BC-2005-01201.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01201 INDEX NUMBER: 128.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Oct 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full five years he reenlisted for on 8 Feb 05 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02161

    Original file (BC-2005-02161.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 April 2004 applicant applied for a CJR and was approved on 14 April 2004. DPPAE states effective 29 April 2004, the applicant’s SRB was deleted and she was not eligible to reenlist at that time to receive the SRB due to her not being within 3 months prior to her expiration term of service (ETS). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the applicant should be given the relief requested.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02606

    Original file (BC-2003-02606.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior to his involuntary cross training into weapons control, he had been either Airmen of the Year or NCO of the Year at every base where he was assigned. The Air Force is requesting recoupment of $411.96 for the enlistment they should have removed from his records. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02994

    Original file (BC-2004-02994.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02994 INDEX NUMBER: 128.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC), 4N051, Aerospace Medical Service Journeyman. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00628

    Original file (BC-2002-00628.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00628 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) in his new career field (3E0X2) rather than the SRB from his previous career field (3E5X1). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01822

    Original file (BC-2004-01822.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFPC/DPPAE copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and stated he enclosed an email sent from Capt S__, 347th MSS Military Personnel Flight (MPF) commander, to Col R__ at AFPC. The Board notes that, at the time he had arranged to be sworn in as a US citizen on 30 April 2004, the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) was in effect for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01199

    Original file (BC-2005-01199.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFI 36-2626, Airman Retraining Program, Attachment 8, SRB Provisions for Retraining, requires the enlistee to acknowledge understanding that if he retrains from a non-SRB skill to an SRB skill or vice-versa, he would not receive an SRB if he reenlists to obtain the retraining retainability, and if he remains eligible to reenlist, he is entitled to the SRB multiple level in effect when final approval is received. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03802

    Original file (BC-2005-03802.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    According to AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Mar 04, the applicant extended his 3 May 00 enlistment for 18 months for the purpose of having sufficient retainability for Career Airmen Reenlistment Reservation System (CAREERS) retraining into Air Field Management (AFSC 1C7X1). As pointed out by HQ USAF/JAA, the applicant is “better off” with the existing 17-month extension plus a four-year reenlistment, with a four-year SRB,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00399

    Original file (BC-2005-00399.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been eligible for an IEB or SRB because other personnel in the same career field at his technical training school and duty station received a bonus. At the time of the applicant’s initial enlistment with the Air Force, he was an E-4 with over four years of Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS); therefore, he is not qualified for an IEB, SRB, or PSRB. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2000.03350

    Original file (BC-2000.03350.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    3A031 – Information Management Apprentice, 9 mos On 14 Aug 99, he was honorably discharged, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service), and was issued an RE code of 4G (No AFSC awarded that is commensurate with grade). A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant contends that he did not realize he had been reassigned to AFSC 3A031,...