Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00557
Original file (BC-2004-00557.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-00557
            INDEX CODE:  130.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect his status as a  Prisoner  of  War
(POW) and he be awarded the POW Medal.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was a POW from 20 Jun 44 to 30 Oct 44.

In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a statement from  the
Army Review Boards Agency and congressional correspondence.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant’s available military personnel records indicate he  enlisted
in the Army of the United States (Army Air Force) on 26 Oct 42.

On 20 Jun 44, the applicant was a crewmember of a  B-24  bomber  which
participated in a bombardment mission to Politz, Germany.  The  bomber
sustained damage from enemy anti-aircraft fire.  A radio  message  was
received from the crew of the plane  which  stated  it  was  going  to
Sweden.  Casualty reports in the applicant’s records indicate  he  was
interned in a neutral country from 20 Jun 44 to 30 Oct 44.

On 25 Aug 45, he was honorably discharged  on  25  Aug  45  under  the
provisions of AR 615 365 (Demobilization).

Applicant was appointed a first lieutenant, United States Army Reserve
(Dental Corps) on 25 Sep 51 and was ordered to extended active duty on
8 Oct 51.  He was honorably discharged from all appointments on 29 May
54.  He was credited with 5 years, 6 months,  and  11  days  of  total
active service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPF indicated that based on the law, governing directives, and HQ
AFPC/JA legal review, they recommend denial.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPF evaluation, with  attachments,  is  at
Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  applicant  on  23
Jul 04 for review and response.  As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit D).

Copies of the memoranda from the Office of the  General  Counsel  were
provided to applicant on 5 Oct 04 for review and response.  As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   The  applicant's  complete
submission was thoroughly  reviewed  and  his  contentions  were  duly
noted.  However, we do not find the  applicant’s  assertions  and  the
documentation  provided  in  support  of   his   appeal   sufficiently
persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air Force  office
of primary responsibility (OPR),  which  included  an  attached  legal
review from AFPC/JA.  In our view, the intent of the governing statute
was not to provide blanket recognition of all internees as  POWs,  but
to award the POW Medal to those individuals taken prisoner by  foreign
armed forces  that  are  hostile  to  the  United  States,  and  whose
circumstances have been determined to be  comparable  to  those  under
which persons have generally been held captive by enemy  armed  forces
during periods of  armed  conflict.   Therefore,  we  agree  with  the
recommendation of the OPR and adopt the rationale provided by  AFPC/JA
as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain
his burden of establishing he has  suffered  either  an  error  or  an
injustice.  Accordingly, we find  no  compelling  basis  to  recommend
granting the relief sought  in  this  application.   However,  if  the
applicant  were  to  provide  additional  documentation  showing   his
circumstances as an internee  were  comparable  to  those  individuals
interned in the German POW camps, we would be inclined  to  reconsider
his application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-00557 in Executive Session on 4 Nov 04, under the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Panel Chair
      Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member
      Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Feb 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPF, dated 20 Jul 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Jul 04.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 5 Oct 04, w/atchs.




                                   ROBERT S. BOYD
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01228

    Original file (BC-2004-01228.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s available military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Army of the United States (Army Air Force) on 6 Jul 42. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPF evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 9 Jul 04 for review...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01631

    Original file (BC-2004-01631.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01631 INDEX CODE: 130.00 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect he was a Prisoner of War (POW) in Switzerland instead of an internee. We took notice of the applicant’s contention that his status as an internee be changed to prisoner of war while interned in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00563

    Original file (BC-2004-00563.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on the Army’s definition of internment as a person interned as a POW or enemy alien, he should be identified as a former POW and receive the POW medal. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPF recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that Title 10, United States Code, Section 101(32), defines “former prisoner of war” as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01748

    Original file (BC-2004-01748.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01748 INDEX CODE: 130.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect he was a Prisoner of War (POW) in Sweden instead of an internee. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPF recommends the application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02665

    Original file (BC-2008-02665.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provides a copy of his WD AGO Form 53- 55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, a list of prisoners at Camp Hunenberg, a copy of an escape attempt military police report and other associated documents pertaining to his internment. The complete AFPC/DPWC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provides the definition of a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03664

    Original file (BC-2003-03664.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPW recommends denial of POW status or the POW medal because the applicant was an internee in Sweden and, by definition, was not a POW. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the PH medal because there is no evidence in the applicant’s military personnel record demonstrating he was injured as a direct result of enemy action, and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03799

    Original file (BC-2002-03799.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant's available military personnel records indicate that he was appointed a second lieutenant, Army of the United States (Air Corps) and entered on active duty on 3 Nov 43. Holland was neutral. SAF/GCI indicated that the instant case involves Holland, a belligerent country, that was occupied by enemy forces at the time of the applicant’s internment.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00736

    Original file (BC-2010-00736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00736 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late father be awarded the Prisoner of War (POW) Medal. POW status to internees in Switzerland requires the Secretary of the Air Force to determine that Swiss officials were acting on behalf of a foreign armed force hostile to the United States during...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04213

    Original file (BC-2010-04213.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The statute requires the Secretary concerned to issue a POW medal to any person who was taken prisoner and held captive by foreign armed forces that are hostile to the United States, under circumstances which the Secretary finds to have been comparable to those under which persons have generally been held captive by enemy armed forces during periods of armed conflict. Finally, while the claim the Secretary of the Air Force has made no such finding about whether internees of Switzerland meet...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200974

    Original file (0200974.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 25 Apr 02, HQ AFPC/DPPRSP advised the applicant that his WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlistment Record and Report of Separation, Honorable Discharge, was administratively corrected to reflect his POW status from 18 Nov 44 – 26 May 45 and award of the POW Medal and Distinguished Unit Citation. The FY97 NDAA designated those members interned in Siberia as eligible for the POW Medal and a $2.50 daily subsistence allowance. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...