Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04088
Original file (BC-2003-04088.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-04088
            INDEX CODE:  131.09

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His rank of sergeant be restored.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was demoted from the rank  of  sergeant  to  private  without  just
cause.

In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement,
a copy of his WD  AGO  Form  53-55  (Enlisted  Record  and  Report  of
Separation) and additional documents associated with the issues  cited
in  his  contentions.   The  applicant’s  complete  submission,   with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant's military personnel records were destroyed by fire in 1973.
 Therefore, the facts surrounding his reduction  and  separation  from
the Army Air Force cannot be verified.

Information extracted from  applicant’s  submission  reveals  that  he
entered active duty on 26 October 1942.  On 6 April 1943, in the grade
of private first class, the applicant completed the Airplane Mechanics
Course at Seymour Johnson Field, NC.  He was honorably discharged from
the Army Air Force on 31 August 1945 under the provisions of  AR  615-
365 (convenience of the  government  RR  1-1  (demobilization)).   His
highest grade held was corporal.  The applicant had completed a  total
of 1 year, 3 months and 23 days of continental service and 1  year,  6
months and 13 days of foreign service and was serving in the grade  of
corporal at the time of discharge.
_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPWB recommends the  application  be  time  barred.   DPPPWB
states that the applicant has waited more  than  58  years  after  his
discharge to petition the AFBCMR.  His unreasonable delay  has  caused
prejudice to the Air Force.  Relevant records have been  destroyed  or
are no longer  available,  memories  have  failed  and  witnesses  are
unavailable.  DPPPWB has reviewed the limited  records  and  finds  no
documentation concerning  his  reduction  from  sergeant  to  private.
There is no documentation showing he ever held the grade of  sergeant.
The applicant’s Enlisted Record  and  Report  of  Separation  reflects
corporal as the highest grade held.  The HQ AFPC/DPPPWB evaluation  is
at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  applicant  on  6
February 2004 for review and response (Exhibit C).

On 25 February 2004, the applicant requested that his  application  be
withdrawn.  By letter, dated 19 May 2004, the applicant requested that
his appeal be reopened for consideration by the Board (Exhibit D).

The applicant reviewed  the  advisory  opinion  and  states  that  the
personal letter he has provided, with the letterhead of U.S. Army  Air
Forces Flexible Gunnery School,  dated  13  July  1943,  indicates  he
completed the training and was promoted to sergeant.  In addition,  he
has provided copies of numerous envelopes,  with  the  return  address
showing “Sgt.”  The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments,
is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case.
However, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed  as
the basis for our decision that the applicant has  failed  to  sustain
his burden that he has suffered  either  an  error  or  an  injustice.
Although the applicant submitted a  copy  of  a  personal  letter  and
envelopes with the return address reflecting the rank of sergeant,  no
official documentation has been provided to substantiate he  held  the
rank of sergeant.  We note that the  applicant’s  separation  document
clearly reflects his highest grade held was corporal.  Notwithstanding
any argument concerning the highest grade the applicant held on active
duty, the applicant’s separation document appears to indicate that  he
was demoted to the grade of private at some time during  his  military
service.  Other than his own assertions, the applicant has provided no
evidence showing his separation in the grade of private was  erroneous
or unjust.  Without documentary evidence showing the contrary was  the
case, we find no compelling basis to  recommend  granting  the  relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 29 July 2004, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                  Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
                  Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
                  Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in  connection  with
AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-04088.

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 12 Nov 03, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, dated 22 Jan 04.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Feb 04.
   Exhibit D.  Letters from Applicant, dated 25 Feb 04 and
               19 May 04.
   Exhibit E.  Letter from Applicant, dated 24 Apr 04, w/atchs.




                                   RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02269

    Original file (BC-2003-02269.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her appeal, the applicant has provided a personal statement, a Certificate of Death from the state of ---, a copy of a court document naming the deceased’s wife as executor of his estate, copies of orders awarding the Air Medal and an oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal to the deceased member, an obituary, a congressional request for information from C/M Jo Bonner of Alabama, a copy of the deceased members Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, a copy of his Army Qualification...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01020

    Original file (BC-2004-01020.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPWB recommends the application be denied. An exception to policy skill level waiver request was submitted and approved on 6 November 2003. We have seen no evidence showing the applicant was not provided fair and equitable promotion consideration in accordance with existing policy and procedures.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802688

    Original file (9802688.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement and copies of his internment papers, dated 20 Jun 44, showing his grade as sergeant, Special Orders #121, dated 1 Dec 44, showing his grade at release from Sweden as private, his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Report and Report of Separation) and his discharge certificate (Exhibit A). The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9802688

    Original file (9802688.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement and copies of his internment papers, dated 20 Jun 44, showing his grade as sergeant, Special Orders #121, dated 1 Dec 44, showing his grade at release from Sweden as private, his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Report and Report of Separation) and his discharge certificate (Exhibit A). The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00522

    Original file (BC-2005-00522.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s discharge records, WD AGO Form 53, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge and a copy of his honorable discharge certificate from the Army show his last held grade to be “private first class.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPWB recommends the applicant’s request be time barred. AFPC/DPPPWB’s complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02465

    Original file (BC-2003-02465.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal the applicant had provided a personal statement, a letter from the VFW to the applicant, copies of his honorable discharge certificate, his Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, and copies of several orders indicating travel between stations, completion of training, promotion (to Corporal), and discharge. They informed the applicant, based on the documentation provided, they can find no evidence that the applicant was ever promoted to Sgt or SSgt. After a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01683

    Original file (BC-2004-01683.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 25 June 1945, his service record shows his rank as private. The Board majority also notes that on 26 June 1945, his service record shows his rank was private. However, his service records also clearly shows that at the time of his discharge on 26 June 1945, he was serving in the grade of private because of a demotion.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00403

    Original file (BC-2004-00403.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPWB states that a review of the applicant’s record reveals only one report was actually indorsed by MSgt B--- (28 January 1966 - 27 January 1967). To be considered for promotion to master sergeant, an individual must have 24 months time- in-grade, possess a 7-skill level Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC), and be recommended by the commander. They found nothing in his record to indicate an error or injustice was made that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202356

    Original file (0202356.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02356 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable and his grade of staff sergeant (SSgt) be reinstated. On 2 Nov 59, the Staff Judge Advocate found the case file to be legally sufficient to support a discharge for unfitness with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00977

    Original file (BC-2004-00977.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant was promoted to the grade of senior airman with an effective date and date of rank of 8 Jul 99. Based on information provided by the Air Force, he was selected for promotion to SSgt during cycle 00E5 (promotions effective Sep 00 - Aug 01). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, in accordance with the governing Air Force instructions, airmen selected for promotion to SSgt, MSgt or CMSgt must complete in-residence...