RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-04059
INDEX CODE: 112.07
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her records be corrected to reflect her married name and a new DD Form
214 be issued.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her name has changed.
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of DD Form
214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 July 1975, and
was retired in the grade of technical sergeant on 1 August 1995. She
served 20 years and 2 days of total active service.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSFCM recommends denial. AFI 36-2608, Military Personnel
Records System, Table A7.2, Rule 1, states that if a member submits a
name change request due to marriage, then the member must furnish the
original or certified copy of the marriage certificate.
Correspondence was sent to the member on 23 December 2003, requesting
the required document. Additionally, a message was left on her
answering machine on 28 January 2004, requesting she furnish the
required documentation. As of this date, she has made no contact with
their office. Therefore, this application should be denied.
The DPSFCM evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
27 Feb 04, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. The applicant was asked on
several occasions to furnish the original or certified copy of her
marriage certificate to support her claim, but she failed to respond
to those requests. Since she did not provide the additional
information requested in order to sufficiently evaluate her claim, it
is our opinion that no basis exists to grant the relief sought in this
application. Accordingly, the applicant's request is not favorably
considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-
04059 in Executive Session on 27 April 2004, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. James E. Short, Panel Chair
Ms. Deborah A. Erickson, Member
Ms. Martha A Maust, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Dec 03 w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSFCM, dated 18 Feb 04.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Feb 04.
JAMES E. SHORT
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03092
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03092 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that she may enlist in the Navy. The basis for the action was on 7 March 1996, a medical evaluation board found she did not meet minimum medical standards to join the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00524
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPRFQ states the applicant did not respond to the request to provide documentation to reflect her deployment in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03672
Item 6 (Reserve Obligation Termination Date) of her DD Form 214 dated 27 Sep 02, be changed from “20090410” to “20040324.” b. She believed that when she was demobilized and transferred to the USAFR (as indicated on her DD Form 214), that her time towards fulfilling her Military Service Obligation (MSO) would continue. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03080
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03080 INDEX CODE: 106.00 XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed so she may reenlist in the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01135
Counsel states that the applicant was not separated because of a pre-existing condition, which was aggravated by active duty service. The majority of the Board believes that the BCMR Medical Consultant’s findings provide a reasonable basis to conclude that the injury to the applicant’s elbow while on active duty was a new and distinct injury rather than EPTS. Given that the applicant disclosed her previous elbow injury during her enlistment physical and was given a waiver, the majority of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01175
On 23 August 2004, she was provided a copy of her 1 July 2004 EPR from the military personnel flight (MPF). AFPC/DPPPEP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 June 2005, for review and response within 30 days. We are not convinced by the evidence she provided in support of her appeal, that the contested...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03537
The DPSFCMP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20 Feb 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that absent an original or...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03997
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03997 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record is attached at Exhibit C. The applicant’s records were administratively corrected on 12 Jul 00 to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01932
She be given SSB consideration by the CY04J Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board with inclusion of a letter she wrote to the original board; her Officer Selection Brief (OSB) be corrected to reflect her five-month deployment in 2003 to the CENTCOM AOR and removal of AF Form 77 closing 26 May 2000, from her Officer Selection Record (OSR) and the corresponding OPRs for the same rating period from all of the benchmark records for the purpose of SSB consideration. She wrote a letter to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03216
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRS asserts that, based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the discretion of the discharge authority. As the applicant presents no facts warranting a change to her SPD code, denial is recommended. On 3 Feb 03, she requested discharge from active duty due to pregnancy and separated on 1 May 03...