RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-04051
INDEX CODE: 100.01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His name be changed from XXXX to XXX and gender changed from male to
female in his military personnel records.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He desires to obtain a statement of service (SOS) that lists his
correct gender (female) and direction for DEERS and the Defense
Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to correct their database to
reflect the same. He feels the service he has received as a retiree
has been earned and his quality of life is hindered by databases being
incorrect. These errors have the potential to cause problems with
medical insurance or other issues.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 21 May 1973 and
continued to reenlist contracting his last enlistment on 5 September
1989, in the grade of master sergeant for a period of four years.
On 31 August 1993, the applicant retired in the grade of master
sergeant. He served 20 years, 3 months, and 10 days of total active
military service.
An order of the District Court, 116th Judicial District, Dallas
County, dated 23 February 1999, ordered the applicant’s name changed
from and ordered the applicant’s gender identification changed from
male to female.
A Notification of Change in Service Member’s Official Records, AF Form
281, indicates the name change was completed under the provisions of
AFI 36-2608 and Denton County, Texas, decree, granting the change of
name of adult. Copies of the notice were forwarded to the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the National Personnel Record Center
(NPRC).
On 30 December 2003, HQ AFPC/DPSFCM advised the applicant his request
to change his name from and to change his gender from male to female
had been completed. They indicated because he had a continuing
affiliation with the Air Force as a retiree, they updated his name in
the military personnel data system (MilPDS). The update would flow to
his retiree pay file. They provided an AF Form 281, Notification of
Change in Service Member’s Official Records as a source document for
the update. They further advised they were unable to make an update
to his gender, as the Air Force has no procedures in place in regard
to gender changes.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPS recommended denial. They indicated they reviewed the action
taken by the Navy Board for Correction of Military Records (NBCMR) and
the Navy found the existence of an injustice warranting partial relief
in the cases the applicant enclosed. They, however, did not see an
injustice in the applicant’s personnel record. The Air Force
personnel record correctly reflects the applicant’s name and gender
during the period of service and on the date of retirement. The
current name and gender information does not mirror the name and
gender information contained in the personnel record. Therefore,
correcting the applicant’s historical records is an unjustified
action. Additionally, an SOS has no significance when verifying
military service. Any organization attempting to verify the
applicant’s service will ask for the DD Form 214. In this case, the
information on the DD Form 214 is correct as of the date the applicant
retired from the United States Air Force. As such, the applicant
would have to provide the organization additional information
concerning the discrepancy between the DD Form 214 and present
circumstances. Therefore, they believe issuing an SOS, similar to the
ones issued by the Navy, is an inappropriate action to take on this
application. The Air Force and Department of Defense have no
procedures in place in regard to this type of change. The applicant’s
records correctly reflect the legal name/gender under which the
applicant served and retired.
The evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the evaluation and indicated she is not asking
the Board to correct her DD Form 214 or any other part of the
historical service records since the records correctly show that a
male [applicant’s original name] served in the Air Force from 21 May
1973 until retirement on 31 August 1993. She is aware a statement of
service has no significance when verifying military service. It is
because of her continuing affiliation with the Air Force as a retiree
that her name could be updated and why her gender marker should be
also.
Applicant’s response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an injustice warranting partial relief. The
applicant contends her quality of life has been hindered by DFAS
databases being incorrect. She feels these errors have the potential
to cause a variety of problems. After reviewing the evidence of
record, the Board believes the applicant should be provided a document
that not only reflects her current name but also indicates her active
duty service. We understand we should not change the applicant’s
original DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release from Active Duty) because
it accurately reflects the applicant’s information during the period
of active duty service and should not be altered because of post-
service name and gender changes. On the other hand, we believe the
original DD Form 214 is a hindrance to the applicant should she be
required to provide documents to a servicing facility for her needs,
such as insurance companies, hospitals, places of employment, etc. We
note the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) considered a
similar case and provided that individual with a Statement of Service
(SOS), but apparently made no further correction to the individual’s
records. We have not been provided a copy of that SOS, therefore we
cannot comment regarding what is included on the form. Regardless, we
are not inclined to provide this applicant with only an SOS. In our
opinion, to do so would be arbitrary and capricious if the applicant
is not also provided an additional DD Form 214, reflecting her current
name and verifying military service. As the applicant indicates, the
SOS does not verify military service. We have been advised that we
have the authority to issue an additional DD Form 214 denoting the
applicant’s current name. We believe this will provide the applicant
with adequate documentation to reflect her active duty service using
her current name. Presumably this should prevent embarrassing
questions and hopefully ensure the applicant’s privacy to the extent
she wishes. Therefore, we recommend the records be corrected to the
extent indicated below.
5. In regard to the applicant’s request to have her DEERS record
reflect a change in gender, the applicant is advised that those
records are controlled at the Department of Defense level and as such,
the Board is not authorized to change these records. If the applicant
believes her gender is not correct on the DEERS records, she may wish
to apply for a correction of her records under the provisions of the
Privacy Act. We have been advised the applicant should forward her
request to the following address: , Defense Manpower Data Center
West, DOD Center, Monterey Bay, 400 Giglind Road, Seaside, CA 93555-
6771. The applicant may wish to include a copy of the court order
regarding her gender change and other relevant documentation.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected, as an exception to policy, by
issuing an additional DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release from Active
Duty), reflecting in block 1, Name: , and blocks 2 through 30 reflect
the identical information as indicated on the original DD Form 214
issued on the occasion of retirement, effective 31 August 1993,
currently in the applicant’s record.
It is further recommended the original DD Form 214 issued on the
occasion of retirement, effective 31 August 1993, be maintained in the
applicant’s records.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-04051 in Executive Session on 21 April 2004, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Frederick R. Beaman III, Member
Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 December 2003, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Military Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPS, dated 18 March 2004.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 March 2004.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-04051
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the
Air Force relating to , be corrected, as an exception to policy, by
issuing an additional DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release from Active
Duty), reflecting in block 1, Name: , and reflecting in blocks 2
through 30 the identical information as indicated on the original DD
Form 214 issued on the occasion of the applicant’s retirement,
effective 31 August 1993, currently in the applicant’s record.
It is further directed the original DD Form 214 issued on
the occasion of the applicant’s retirement, effective 31 August 1993,
be maintained in the applicant’s records.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009267
The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her gender as female. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. It appears the same gender (male) was recorded at the time of the applicant's enlistment in 1980 and alleged separation from active duty in 1995.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00989
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00989 INDEX CODE 100.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The DD Form 214 issued upon retirement be changed to reflect the current legal name of “------.” rather than “-----.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 12 February 2002, she...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082178C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests reconsideration of her earlier application to correct her military records to show her current sex. She also requests that her military records be corrected to show her new name.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02995
Her records be corrected to reflect her name change. For these reasons, she believes her request to change her gender on her military records be allowed. We note the SAF/MR memorandum dated 9 March 2015, states that corrections to the DD Form 214 should be for the limited purposes of mitigating an injustice caused by use of the DD Form 214.
To grant the relief sought would cause undue administrative burdens on the military records custodian in the correction of records that were not recorded in error. The original male name and gender on Chief ’s DD Form 214 were correct at the time the document was issued; 2. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair Attachment: Record of Proceedings AFBCMR 98-02489 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: I have carefully reviewed the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021494
The applicant requests correction of her military records to reflect her new name and gender. The applicant is a transgender female and respectfully requests that all of her documents reflect her correct name and gender, which have been legally changed. Once a DD Form 214 has been issued, it will not be reissued except under specified circumstances, including when it is determined that the original DD Form 214 cannot be properly corrected by issuing a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010594
They have advised him that he needs to have his military records completely changed to show his gender as male for them to correct their records. The applicant did not undergo the sex reassignment surgery (from female to male) or change of name until more than 16 years after discharge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. including in the applicant's official records the fact that as of the 31 January...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-060
The veteran’s military records, which include a birth certificate, show that the veteran was born female and served in the Coast Guard with a female name.1 The applicant alleged that he is the veteran and that State courts have legally changed his gender to male and his name to the male name shown in the case caption. The applicant also submitted a copy of the court order that legally changed his gender to male and ordered the State to issue him a new birth certificate to reflect this...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-181
In support of her allegations, the applicant submitted photocopies of the following documents: • A court order identifying the petitioner, John Doe, by his date and place of birth and parents’ names, changing his name to Jim Roe, and sealing the order in accordance with State law; • A court order stating that the petitioner, Jim Roe, had previously changed his name to Jim Roe, further changing the petitioner’s name to Jane Roe, and sealing the order in accordance with State law; • The United...
CG | BCMR | Alcohol and Drug Cases | 2008-181
In support of her allegations, the applicant submitted photocopies of the following documents: • A court order identifying the petitioner, John Doe, by his date and place of birth and parents’ names, changing his name to Jim Roe, and sealing the order in accordance with State law; • A court order stating that the petitioner, Jim Roe, had previously changed his name to Jim Roe, further changing the petitioner’s name to Jane Roe, and sealing the order in accordance with State law; • The United...