RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03557
INDEX CODE: 110.03
COUNSEL: JAMES ADAMS, JR.
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would
enable him to reenlist.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
On 7 January 1999 he was married while in the process of transferring
between duty stations: Kunsan Air Base (AB), South Korea, to Hill Air
Force Base (AFB), Utah. His new wife was pregnant. Four hours after
he was wed, he left for Hill AFB with the promise he would return for
his wife in February 1999 after he was settled into his new duty
station. His wife’s parents visited their daughter and demanded an
answer for what he and his new wife had done. In March 1999, his
wife’s parents moved her to Idaho in an attempt to hide her from him.
During this time, he made contact with her and found out she had
miscarried their baby. In April 1999, he was involved in a car
accident on the way to Idaho to pick up his wife and suffered a
herniated disk in his back for which he was hospitalized. Her parents
found out about his attempt to retrieve their daughter and moved her
to California. Shortly after, in May 1999, his wife returned to her
parent’s home in Mt. Vernon, Washington. He left Hill AFB for
Washington on 10 May 1999, spoke with his wife, was convinced by her
that the marriage was over, and returned to Hill AFB to face whatever
punishment awaited him there.
On 4 May 1999, he was ordered to participate in a random urinalysis
drug test. He signed the acknowledgment form that morning at his
orderly room where he was ordering Career Development Course (CDC)
materials. He was radioed to return to work, which he did. All
attempts to get a ride to the Demand Reduction Facility for his
urinalysis test after returning to work were unsuccessful.
Consequently, he went, with his supervisor, to the base hospital where
he provided a sample that tested negative. On 10 May 1999, he left
his duty station without permission to travel to Mt. Vernon,
Washington, to confront his wife. On 11 June 1999, he turned himself
in to security forces at McChord AFB, Washington and was put on a
plane back to Hill AFB. He subsequently pleaded guilty for Failure to
Go (urinalysis testing) and for being Absent Without Leave (AWOL),
from 10 May through 10 June 1999. He was convicted of both and given
a choice of a Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) or confinement. He chose
the BCD and was subsequently discharged with a BCD after reduction to
the lowest enlisted grade.
He argues since he was restricted to the base (Hill AFB), that he was
unable, at the time, to gather any pertinent documents that may have
helped him defend himself. He feels he now has more understanding and
maturity and that he could be an asset to the military. His first
three and one half years of service were honorable and he participated
in the Honor Guard, volunteered for community service, and other base
functions, and earned the Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM). Since
his discharge, he has been an asset to his community by volunteering
in several areas and has earned his Associates degree. He asks that
he be able to serve in the AF again, but if not then asks for an RE
Code that would enable him to serve in one of the other services. He
understands a “corrected” RE code will not guarantee his acceptance
into any branch of the military service. He has kept himself within
AF standards, physically, mentally and morally.
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided personal
statements from himself and his wife, letters of support from his
current and past employers, copies of information regarding RE codes
from the Air Force Personnel Center’s (AFPC’s) web site, a copy of the
Letter of Restriction (LOR) from his commander at Hill AFB, a copy of
his package to the Discharge Review Board, a portion of his military
training record, copies of various letters of appreciation, work
schedules, and certificates related to his volunteerism, copies of his
higher education work and diploma’s, a copy of his travel order from
Kunsan AB to Hill AFB, copies of Enlisted Performance Reports (EPR’s)
for the period 6 September 1996 through 7 May 1999, copies of civilian
performance appraisals, stock ownership certificates, a marriage
certificate, a police record check dated 21 January 2003 from Mt
Vernon, WA, and copies of college transcripts.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant entered Regular Active Duty on 17 April 1996. He attained
the rank of senior airman (SRA/E-4) with a date of rank of 17 April
1999. On 22 July 1999, he was demoted to the lowest enlisted grade
available: Airman Basic (E-1) and discharged with a Bad Conduct
Discharge (BCD) effective 9 November 2000 pursuant to his conviction
for being AWOL and for Failure to Go. On 23 January 2003, he
testified before a Discharge Review Board (DRB) that found the
discharge to be consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), but the
punishment given for the offenses was simply too harsh. The DRB did
not think the crimes so serious as to justify a BCD and therefore,
granted clemency in the form of his discharge being upgraded to
general (under honorable conditions). He was discharged with an RE
code of “2B”, Discharged under General under-other-than-honorable
conditions.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. Evidence has not been
provided in support of his appeal that would lead us to believe that a
change to his RE code is warranted. We took note of his complete
submission in judging the merits of this case and while we support the
Discharge Review Board’s act of clemency in upgrading his discharge,
we are not persuaded he has suffered either an error or injustice
regarding the RE code he received for his conduct while on active
duty. Therefore, in the absence of persuasive evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-03557 in Executive Session on 6 January 2004, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel Chair
Mr. James W. Russell, Member
Mr. J. Dean Yount, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Oct 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Nov 03.
PEGGY E. GORDON
Panel Chair
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0028
The applicant received a Bad Conduct Discharge, a punitive discharge, as part of his sentence resulting from a Special Court-Martial conviction. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD2002-0028 (Former AB) (HGH Unknown) 1. Plea: G. Finding: G. Specification: Did, at or near Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho, from on or about 20 y, of a value of about September 1997 to on or about 10 October 19 $2,600.00, the property of...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0263
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0263 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Further, he recalled several commanders’ complaints of unprofessional behavior were traced to respondent. (3) Also entered into evidence were two AF Forms 174, Record of Counseling, regarding her unprofessional behavior during a SAV and over the telephone and her negative attitude (Gov Ex 15, 42, respectively).
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00198
T WEST, SUITE 40 AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I 1 I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00198 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01244
His wife and son remained hospitalized until 20 September 2002 and the applicant was ordered to return to Malstrom AFB on 21 September 2002. Consequently, the applicant could have been authorized PTDY for the period that his wife was hospitalized: 4 through 15 July 2002. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2003-01244 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of...
INDEX CODE: 128.02 AFBCMR 00-03044 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01127 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be changed to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. RITA S. LOONEY Panel Chair 15 SEP 1998 MEMORANDUMFORAFBCMR FROM: AFLSA/JAJM 112 Luke...
She indicated on her DD Form 1299, Application for Shipment and/or Storage of Personal Property, that her shipment would contain professional items. In support of her request applicant provided a memorandum from the Quality Assurance office; her excess cost rebuttal adjudication letter; DD Forms 139, Pay Adjustment Authorization; DD Form 1299; AF Form 767, Extended Active Duty Order; and, Notification of Indebtedness letter. ...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00478
For this misconduct you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) on 28 Mar 96. b. For this misconduct you received an Article 15 on 2 Jul96 which included a suspended reduction to airman basic, forfeiture of $100.00 pay for one month, and seven days correctional custody, This Article 15 was placed in your existing UIF. For this misconduct you received an Article 15 on 17 Apr 97 which included reduction to the grade of airman, with a new date of rank of 17 Apr 97 and restriction to Malmstrorn...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00169
DATE: 8/24/2004 -- SECRETARY O F THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1.535 CObrnlAND DR, EE WING, 3 R D FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, nm 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00169 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on December...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02525
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code be changed from 2X (First-term, second- term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) to one that will allow him to enlist into another service. He was...