RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03194
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was told that his 1954 undesirable discharge would be upgraded
within six months of his discharge. He was allowed to serve in the
Army from 1956 until he was honorably released in 1959.
In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of his DD
Forms 214 from the Air Force and the Army. The applicant’s complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 30
October 1952. He was progressively promoted to the grade of airman
basic, with an effective date and date of rank of 30 January 1954.
On 27 May 1954, applicant was tried before a summary court-martial at
March AFB, CA. He pled guilty to the charge of failure to go to his
appointed place of duty, on or about 21 May 1954, in violation of
Article 85, UCMJ, and for disobeying a lawful order, in violation of
Article 92, UCMJ. He was found guilty and sentenced to confinement at
hard labor for 30 days and forfeiture of $55.00. The sentence was
approved by the convening authority. At the time of the above court-
martial, the applicant had two previous court-martial convictions for
being Absent Without Leave (AWOL). One prior special court-martial
conviction was for being AWOL 13 October 1953 - 4 December 1953, 4-8
January 1954, and 11-13 January 1954. He pled guilty and was
sentenced to confinement at hard labor for five months and forfeiture
of $50.00 per month for five months. The sentence was adjudged on 26
January 1954. The second summary court-martial conviction was for
being AWOL 7 June 1953 - 1 July 1953. He pled guilty and was
sentenced to restriction for 30 days and forfeiture of $55.00. The
convening authority approved the sentence on 9 July 1953.
On 19 July 1954, the applicant’s commander requested a Board of
Officers be convened for the purpose of determining whether or not the
applicant should be discharged from the service by reason of
unfitness. The reason for this action was due to the applicant being
court-martialed on three different occasions. The applicant
acknowledged notification of the commander’s initiated action against
him; however, he waived his entitlement to appear before a Board of
Officers and requested discharge. A personal affairs officer
indicated he had interviewed and counseled the applicant concerning
his rights. On 9 August 1954, the discharge authority approved the
recommended separation and directed that the applicant be issued an
undesirable discharge. He received an undesirable discharge on 23
August 1954 under the provisions of AFR 39-17. He had completed a
total of 1 year, 1 month and 17 days and was serving in the grade of
airman basic at the time of discharge. He had a total of 247 days of
lost time.
Information extracted from applicant’s submission reveals that he
contracted his enlistment in the United States Army (Regular) on 23
October 1956 in the grade of private (E-1) for a period of three
years. On 23 October 1959, he was honorably released from active duty
and transferred to the United States Army Reserve. He had completed a
total of 2 years, 11 months and 28 days and was serving in the grade
of private first class (temporary) at the time of separation. He had
a total of three days of lost time.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRSP recommends the application be denied. DPPRSP states
that there are no regulations or directives that allow for an
automatic upgrade of a discharge within six months or any timeframe
after a separation. The applicant did not submit any new evidence or
identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge
processing. Additionally, he provided no facts warranting an upgrade
in his discharge. The HQ AFPC/DPPRSP evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and indicated that,
following basic training, he was assigned “KP” duty for several
months, which resulted in going AWOL on several occasions. He would
turn himself in and receive his punishment. After some time, he was
made an “MP” until his 23 August 1954 separation. On 23 October 1956,
he enlisted in the Army and served honorably for over two years.
After leaving the service, he was self-employed for several years. In
1981, due to medical problems, he began collecting Social Security
disability. He remarried in March of 1986, has three children, and
has been attending church for the last 13 years.
In support of his request, character reference letters have been
submitted. The applicant’s complete submission, with character
reference letters, is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable injustice regarding the applicant's request that
his 1954 undesirable discharge be upgraded to general. No evidence
has been presented which would lead us to believe his discharge was
improper or contrary to the directive under which it was effected.
Nevertheless, in view of the applicant's 1956 honorable discharge from
the United States Army and his successful transition to civilian life,
as evidenced by the post-service documentation he has provided, the
Board majority is of the opinion that upgrading the applicant's
discharge to general, based on clemency, would be appropriate.
Accordingly, the Board majority recommends that the applicant's
undesirable discharge be upgraded to general.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that, on 23 August 1954, he
was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable
conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 25 February 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Panel Chair
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
Mr. Charlie E. Williams Jr., Member
By a majority vote, Messrs. Boyd and Williams voted to grant the
applicant's request. Mr. Dunn voted to deny the applicant's request
but did not desire to submit a minority report. The following
documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2003-03194.
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Sep 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Identification Record No. 363706C.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRSP, dated 20 Oct 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Oct 03.
Exhibit F. Letter from Applicant, dated 1 Dec 03, and
character reference letters.
ROBERT S. BOYD
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-03194
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that, on 23 August
1954, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under
honorable conditions).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00040
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Most of the applicant’s records were destroyed in the Jul 73 fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC). Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS provided their rationale for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03923
In support of her request, the applicant has submitted a copy of her late husband’s death certificate, and a copy of a letter from the National Personnel Records Center dated 12 November 2003. Applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors in the discharge processing, nor provide facts that support upgrading the discharge to honorable (Exhibit C). Novel, Panel Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Nov 03, with attachments.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1999-01111
The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant has not submitted any material or documentation to show that he was unfit due to a physical disability at the time of his discharge. The AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-02478 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable or general. Applicant's request for a change to his discharge was denied by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 12 August 1955. DPPRS stated that the records indicate the applicant’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03100
Applicant's submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The applicant was discharged from the Air Force on 8 November 1954 under the provisions of AFR 39-17 (unfitness) with an undesirable discharge. Second, he went AWOL one time for 30 days.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00662 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant’s request for an upgrade of discharge and a waiver to reenlist was considered and denied by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 21 March 1958 (Exhibit B). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03603
On 2 Nov 95, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend discharge for a pattern of misconduct. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01694
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01694 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation, separation code and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow eligibility to join the Army National Guard. On 29 August 1984, the applicant received notification that he was being...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01109
For this incident, he was tried and convicted by a summary court-martial and sentenced to be confined to hard labor for 26 days, and to forfeit $50.00. On 28 December 1979, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFRDB) requesting his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Additionally, the applicant did not submit any evidence, identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, or provide any facts warranting a...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02109
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02109 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: AMERICAN LEGION HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He had completed a total of 6 month and 11 days and was serving in the grade of airman basic (E-1) at the time of discharge. DPPRS indicated that the applicant...