RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03051
INDEX CODE: 128.14
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His entitlement to move to his home-of-selection (HOS) be restored.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Due to an administrative error, his entitlement was lost when his travel
and household goods (HHGs) shipment costs were charged to his retirement
orders, rather then permanent change-of-station (PCS) without permanent
change-of-assignment (PCA) orders. He was assigned to a geographically
separated unit in Moscow and elected to travel to Hickam AFB, HI to
outprocess. When he departed Moscow he moved using his retirement orders,
which he later found out should not have happened. One month after he
moved, PCS without PCA orders were issued. He did not discover the error
until he recently tried to have his HHGs moved to his final HOS and was
told that he already used his entitlement. He was not properly briefed nor
provided the proper documents in a timely manner. He has been recalled to
active duty with his current term set to end on 31 May 04.
In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his retirement
order, a copy of his PCS without PCA order, and a chronology of events.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Data extracted from the Personnel Data System reflects the applicant was
appointed s second lieutenant, Reserve of the Air Force on 19 Nov 74 and
was voluntarily ordered to extended active duty on that same date. He has
been progressively promoted to the grade of colonel, having assumed that
grade, effective and with a date of rank of 1 Jul 97.
He received an approved retirement effective 1 Nov 01 and orders were
published authorizing him to proceed to his home of selection. While
stationed in Russia, applicant elected to retire at Hickam AFB Hi, (port
retirement). Upon arrival at Hickam, he completed his travel voucher
(which by traveling with his spouse and doing so rendered his move a HOS
move). Subsequent to his HOS move, orders were published authorizing a PCS
without PCA move from Russia to Hawaii. On 4 Jun 02, orders were published
recalling him back to active duty assigning him to Russia; however, his
assignment to Russia was diverted and he filled a position in Hawaii. He
currently has an approved retirement effective 1 May 04.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
USAF/DPRCC states that he is desirous of making a HHG move now rather than
waiting until he is retired for a second time. If the Board were to rule
that he did not make a HOS move on his first retirement; he still could not
use that first retirement order to make a move now because he received a
new order ordering him back to active duty. In accordance with the JFTR
U5330-H, the original retirement order remained in effect until he received
further PCS orders. He received further PCS orders recalling him back to
active duty in June 2002. Once he was recalled to active duty the original
retirement order could no longer be used. DPRCC attempted to obtain a copy
of the orders assigning him to CINPAC in December 2002 to determine if that
order authorized shipment of HHGs. However, the applicant stated in his
chronology "no new order was cut." Absent an order assigning him to
CINPAC, DPRCC recommends that the applicant wait until new retirement
orders are cut. The DPRCC evaluation is at Exhibit B.
AFSLMO/CA states that the applicant should have departed Russia on PCS
without PCA orders which would have entitled him to travel and ship his
HHGs to Hawaii thus allowing his retirement orders to be used for his HOS
move. Once his was recalled, assigned to Russia, and diverted to Hawaii,
there should have been an amendment/rescission order that assigned him to
Hawaii. Approval of this action would result in reinstatement of his
entitlement to a HOS move and nontemporary storage in conjunction with JFTR
U5365. The AFSLMO evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
His intent in 2001 was to retire in Hawaii from Moscow. He returned to
Hawaii to a townhouse he owned and planned to move within a year to a new
home on Oahu using his HOS entitlement. When it became apparent he was to
remain on active duty in Hawaii he began to search for a new house and
asked for a HOS move. That is when he learned about the loss of his HOS
entitlement due to the administrative error. He has since been completely
priced out of the housing market in Oahu. His only recourse now is to
leave Oahu and buy a home in the continental United States. The approval
of a "local short distance move of HHGs" referred to in the AFSLMO
memorandum no longer does him any good. He no longer desires an early
move. He desires reinstatement of his HOS entitlement that would permit
him to retire in any state within the continental United States. His
complete submission is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice that would warrant corrective action. In
this respect, the applicant was stationed in Russia when he elected
retirement from the Air Force to be effective 1 Nov 01. He elected to
retire at Hickam AFB, HI and chose to reside in Hawaii after his
retirement. He and his family traveled to Hawaii using his retirement
orders as the travel authority. However, in accordance with travel
regulations, he should have been provided PCS without PCA orders, which
were provided to the applicant subsequent to his travel, as the authority
for his travel. It appears that his travel to Hawaii was based in good
faith on the documentation he was provided at the time and the counseling
he received. We believe the decision to travel under authority of his
retirement order was inappropriately made through no fault of his own and
that the applicant has suffered an injustice with the loss of his HOS
privileges. Accordingly it is our opinion that his HOS privileges should
be restored as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. He was authorized travel from Russia to Hickam AFB, Hawaii in
2001, under Permanent Change of Station without Permanent Change of
Assignment order, AAB-338, dated 30 September 2001, rather than Retirement
Order AL-000623, dated 11 June 2001.
b. His entitlement to a Home of Selection move under Joint Travel
Federal Travel Regulation, paragraph U5365, be restored.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-
03051 in Executive Session on 4 Feb 04, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Rita S. Looney, Member
Ms. Mary Johnson, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Aug 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, USAF/DPRCC, dated 3 Nov 03, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFSLMO/CA, dated 11 Dec 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Dec 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 28 Dec 03.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-03051
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. He was authorized travel from Russia to Hickam AFB, Hawaii
in 2001, under Permanent Change of Station without Permanent Change of
Assignment order, AAB-338, dated 30 September 2001, rather than Retirement
Order AL-000623, dated 11 June 2001.
b. His entitlement to a Home of Selection move under Joint
Travel Federal Travel Regulation, paragraph U5365, be, and hereby is,
restored.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01115
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01115 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement order be corrected to include a permanent change of station (PCS) without a change of assignment in order to utilize his one move entitlement for a temporary move to Washington state, then, to his home in South Carolina. ECAF states...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017808
Even though he was selected for separation by the SERB, he should have received a new or amended permanent change of station (PCS) order with a different movement designator code (MDC) and authorization for DLA returning him stateside from his assignment in Moscow, Russia in order to properly transition and retire since there were no ACAP services available. A member on active duty is authorized travel and transportation allowances to a home selected by the member from the last PDS when the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04576
CG B-202023, dated 4 Dec 1981, advises that civilian employees married to members of the uniformed services cannot each receive an entitlement for shipment of the same HHG. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 3UN 3 0 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-03541 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: records of ment of the Air The pertinent Force relating to show that...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01263
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in the Air Force evaluation at Exhibit B. JFTR paragraph U5012-I further clarifies that an extension must not be authorized for approval for more than six years from the date of separation or release from active duty unless a member’s certified ongoing medical condition prevents relocation of the member for longer than six years from the retirement date. Based on the above, they believe an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003397
The applicant provides: * retirement orders, dated 11 December 2007 * recall to active duty orders, dated 15 May 2008 * request for extension of final HHG and NTS entitlements * letter from U.S. Army Installation Management Command, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison-Redstone, Redstone Arsenal, AL, dated 21 January 2009 * a letter from the Transportation Office, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison-Redstone, dated 3 January 2012 * request for further extension of final HHG and NTS entitlements *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010783
He states he was not aware of the instructions at the bottom of his retirement order that permitted up to 1 year to choose a home of selection (HOS) and complete his retirement move. The applicant never requested an extension of his entitlement prior to 1 July 2009. Paragraph U5365 does allow for extensions of up to 6 years to a Soldier's shipping entitlement: * for persons undergoing hospitalization or medical treatment, an extension can be granted for the period equal to the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002389
He submits copies of his request letters for extension of his HHG transportation entitlements for years 2013 and 2014. Travel and transportation entitlements expire 6 years from the date of retirement. He provides copies of his requests for extension of his entitlement for years 2013 and 2014; however, he failed to provide extension authorization letters from the transportation office.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05924
On 17 March 2011, the Joint Personal Property Shipping Office Northeast (JPPSO-NE) notified the applicant that his request for an extension was granted until 9 July 2011, a total of 180 days, and that any additional storage time past this date may not be authorized. On 15 June 2011, the applicant was advised that his HHG shipment from Florida in storage at government expense will expire/convert on 9 July 2011. On 17 June 2011, AFPC/DPSIAR notified the applicant and JPPSO-NE that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05924
On 17 March 2011, the Joint Personal Property Shipping Office Northeast (JPPSO-NE) notified the applicant that his request for an extension was granted until 9 July 2011, a total of 180 days, and that any additional storage time past this date may not be authorized. On 15 June 2011, the applicant was advised that his HHG shipment from Florida in storage at government expense will expire/convert on 9 July 2011. On 17 June 2011, AFPC/DPSIAR notified the applicant and JPPSO-NE that the...