Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03242
Original file (BC-2003-03242.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-03242

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general (under honorable  conditions)  discharge  be  upgraded  to
honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He has been afflicted with the disease  of  alcoholism  and  substance
abuse since he was 14 years old.  With the help  of  a  12-step  rehab
program, he has been able to arrest the disease.

In support of the request, he submits a letter from the Bridge Back to
Life Center and a copy of his DD Form 214.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force as an airman basic  on
29 September 1981. On 16 November 1983, he was  discharged  under  the
provisions  of  AFM  39-10,  Administrative   Separation   of   Airman
(Misconduct-Drug Abuse), with service characterized as general  (under
honorable conditions) in the grade of airman first class. He served  2
years, 1 month and 18 days of total active military service.

On 2 November 1983, applicant's commander recommended discharge due to
drug abuse.  On 10 March  1983,  the  applicant  wrongfully  possessed
marijuana and received an Article 15 with  a  suspended  reduction  to
airman, 14 days extra duty and fined $150.  On     20 April,  13  May,
and 14  September,  the  member  wrongfully  possessed  marijuana  and
received three letters of reprimand.

_________________________________________________________________



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS  recommended  denial  and  stated  that  based   upon   the
documentation in the file,  the  discharge  was  consistent  with  the
procedural and substantive requirements of the  discharge  regulation.
Additional, the discharge was  within  the  sound  discretion  of  the
discharge authority.  The  applicant  submitted  a  reference  letter;
however, he did not identify any errors or injustices that occurred in
the discharge processing.  Additionally, he provided  no  other  facts
warranting an upgrade of the discharge.  Accordingly,  they  recommend
his records remain the same and his request be  denied.   He  has  not
filed a timely request.

AFPC/DPPRSP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant on 7 November 2003, for review and comment within  30  days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, the Board excused
the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice.  After a  thorough  review  of
the  evidence  of  record  and  applicant’s  submission,  we  are  not
persuaded that his discharge should be  upgraded  to  honorable.   The
applicant has not established by his  submission  that  his  commander
abused his discretionary authority, and since we find no abuse of that
authority, there is no compelling reason to overturn  the  commander’s
decision.  We agree with the opinions and recommendation  of  the  Air
Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our decision that the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden of having  suffered  either
an error or an injustice.   Therefore, in absence of evidence  to  the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________



THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of a material error or injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2003-
03242 in Executive Session on 9 December 2003, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
                 Ms. Cheryl Jacobson, Member
                 Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Oct 03, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRSP, dated 30 Oct 03.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Nov 03.






      ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
      Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02768

    Original file (BC-2003-02768.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02768 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 29 November 1988, the discharge authority approved the applicant’s request and directed that he be discharged with an under other than...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03202

    Original file (BC-2003-03202.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03202 INDEX CODE: A67.70 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 9 Sep 88, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Misconduct – Drug Abuse) and furnished a general discharge. As of this date, no response has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03243

    Original file (BC-2003-03243.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03243 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 24 August 1984, the member received a letter of counseling (LOC) for failure to go to two in-processing appointments. We are not persuaded by the evidence presented that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0202729

    Original file (0202729.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02924 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 9 January...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02741

    Original file (BC-2003-02741.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was honorably discharged on 22 Oct 02. The DVA awards MGIB benefits to service members who receive an honorable discharge and serve on active duty for three continuous years. An honorable reduction for one of the following reasons may result in a reduction of the required length of active duty: (1) convenience of the government; (2) disability; (3) hardship; (4) a medical condition existing before service (5) force reductions; or (6) physical or mental conditions which prevent...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03701

    Original file (BC-2003-03701.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03701 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to show a favorable discharge and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and to either be compensated monetarily or be credited for 20 years of service. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03100

    Original file (BC-2003-03100.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The applicant was discharged from the Air Force on 8 November 1954 under the provisions of AFR 39-17 (unfitness) with an undesirable discharge. Second, he went AWOL one time for 30 days.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01632

    Original file (BC-2003-01632.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01632 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for discharge be changed to reflect that he was discharged due to a medical condition, rather than unsatisfactory performance. The Medical Consultant's evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRSP recommends denial....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03236

    Original file (BC-2003-03236.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03236 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 28 January 1982, his commander notified the applicant that he was permanently decertified from the performance of duties under the Personnel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200837

    Original file (0200837.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00837 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from...