Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02746
Original file (BC-2003-02746.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-02746
            INDEX CODE:  121.00, 121.03

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO



_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS:

Restoration of 16 days of leave he  was  charged  during  a  Permanent
Change of Station (PCS) from Osan Air Base to  Ramstein  Air  Base  in
October 2001.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was forced to use 16  days  of  extra  leave  because  the  Traffic
Management Office  (TMO)  at  Osan  Air  Base  would  not  adjust  his
departure date and HQ AFPC would not adjust his Report Not Later  Than
Date (RNLTD).  His initial Date  Eligible  for  Return  from  Overseas
(DEROS) was August 2001 and his RNLTD was 15 October 2001.

The two weeks of leave (21-28 August and 25 September-2 October  2001)
were taken involuntarily due to travel restrictions placed on  him  by
his servicing organizations.  He has since learned from  his  Military
Personnel Flight (MPF) that,  in  accordance  with  AFI  36-3003,  “no
member will be in involuntarily leave status for  the  convenience  of
the government.”

No supporting documents  were  submitted.   The  applicant’s  complete
submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is
14 April 1994.  He is  currently  on  active  duty  in  the  grade  of
captain, with an effective date and date of rank of 25 November 1997.
_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPSFM recommends the applicant’s  request  be  denied.   DPSFM
states that the governing Air Force instruction  stipulates  that  the
FSO computes leave for authorized absences in excess of allowed travel
time, PTDY, and  proceed  time,  if  applicable.   The  FSO  correctly
charged the  applicant  leave  for  the  period  of  26 August  to  30
September  2001.   HQ  AFPC/DPSFM  contacted  the  applicant  and  his
assignment officer for additional documentation to  substantiate  that
the applicant’s request to adjust his RNLTD was  denied;  however,  no
documentation was  available.   The  HQ  AFPC/DPSFM  evaluation,  with
attachments, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  applicant  on  10
October 2003 for review and response.  As of this  date,  no  response
has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant’s complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case.
The Board  majority  notes  that  the  applicant’s  contention  sounds
plausible.  However, other than his own assertions, the Board majority
found no evidence to  substantiate  the  applicant’s  claim  that  his
requests for adjustment to his departure date and RNLTD  were  denied.
Should  the  applicant  provide  corroborating  statements  from   his
superiors or officials knowledgeable of the circumstances, they may be
willing to reconsider his request.  In view of the  above  and  absent
sufficient evidence to the  contrary,  the  Board  majority  finds  no
compelling basis to recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.
_________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:

A majority of the panel finds  insufficient  evidence  of  error  or
injustice and recommends the application be denied.
_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 19 November 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:

                  Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                  Ms. Martha Maust, Member
                  Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member

By a majority vote,  Mr.  Markiewicz  and  Ms.  Maust  voted  to  deny
applicant's request.   Ms.  Willis  voted  to  grant  the  applicant's
request but did not desire to submit a minority report.  The following
documentary evidence was considered in connection with  AFBCMR  Docket
Number BC-2003-02746.

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 Jul 03.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSFM, dated 2 Oct 03, w/atchs.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Oct 03.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair



AFBCMR BC-2003-02746




MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR
            CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR)

SUBJECT:  AFBCMR Application of APPLICANT

      I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the
recommendation of the Board members.  A majority found that applicant
had not provided sufficient evidence of error or injustice and
recommended the case be denied.  I concur with that finding and their
conclusion that relief is not warranted.  Accordingly, I accept their
recommendation that the application be denied.

      Please advise the applicant accordingly.




                                                         JOE G.
LINEBERGER
                                                         Director
                                                         Air Force
Review Boards Agency



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03401

    Original file (BC-2003-03401.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Ms. Martha Maust, and Ms. Carolyn B. Willis considered this application on 19 November 2003. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPSFM, dtd 3 Nov 03, with attachment AFBCMR BC-2003-03401 INDEX CODE:...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03531

    Original file (BC-2003-03531.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR BC-2003-03531 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03649

    Original file (BC-2003-03649.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2003-03649 INDEX CODE: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03527

    Original file (BC-2003-03527.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2003-03527 INDEX CODE: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03477

    Original file (BC-2003-03477.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR BC-2003-03477 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02922

    Original file (BC-2003-02922.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    When he out-processed on 31 December 2002, the leave still had not been restored to his account and he was told that he would need to submit an application to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) to have the leave restored. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSFM states that paragraph 10.9.7 of the AFI 36-3003, states in part a member’s application for correction of military records must clearly establish...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03578

    Original file (BC-2003-03578.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2003-03578 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03442

    Original file (BC-2003-03442.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2003-03442 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00314

    Original file (BC-2003-00314.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Jun 01, for review and response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that 21 days of leave were added to his leave account commencing 1 October...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02970

    Original file (BC-2003-02970.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board, Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. Michael V. Barbino, and Ms. Martha Maust considered this application on 8 October 2003. AFBCMR BC 2003-02970 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and...