Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02432
Original file (BC-2003-02432.doc) Auto-classification: Denied





                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-02432
            INDEX CODE:  110.02

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general (Under  Honorable  Conditions)  discharge  be  changed  to
honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He took advantage of an Air Force (AF) Early Out program at the end of
the Vietnam War.  Senator Goldwater wrote a letter on his  behalf  and
he was subsequently accepted at Arizona State University  pursuant  to
USAF directives, and, he was told that his general discharge would  be
changed to honorable.  He would like to take advantage of all benefits
accorded to an honorably discharged veteran of the Vietnam era.

In support of his  appeal,  the  applicant  has  provided  a  personal
statement and copies of DD Form 293, Application  for  the  Review  of
Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States, the
DD Form 214, Report  of  Separation  from  Active  Duty,  his  general
discharge certificate and a letter of support  from  the  Veterans  of
Foreign Wars (VFW).

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his enlistment in the Regular  Air  Force  on  14
July 1972.  He attained the grade of Airman First Class (A1C/E-3).  He
received a letter of Reprimand (LOR) on 30 August 1973 for failing  to
obey the orders of his superior.  On or about 1 November 1973, he  was
found with a tablet of methaqualone  and  received  another  LOR.   He
received an LOR on 24 April 1974 after an inspection of his  dormitory
room was found to be in violation of base  fire  regulations.   On  20
January 1975, he received a LOR after an inspection of his  room  that
found it to be in complete disarray.  On 20 March 1975, he received  a
LOR for smoking marijuana while performing Charge  of  Quarters  duty.
He received an Article 15 on  4  June  1975  for  using  disrespectful
language against a non-commissioned officer and was fined $50.  He was
notified on 4 August 1975 that he was being recommended for  discharge
in accordance with Air Force Regulation  (AFR)  39-12,  Unsuitability-
Apathy,  Defective   Attitude   and   Inability   to   Expend   Effort
Constructively.  He was evaluated on  13  August  1975  whereupon  the
evaluating officer recommended the applicant be discharged immediately
and that he be furnished a general discharge  certificate.   Probation
and rehabilitation (P&R) was considered but deemed inappropriate.   He
declined to  submit  statements  on  his  behalf  and  declined  legal
counsel.   The  base  legal  office  found   the   discharge   legally
sufficient.  He was discharged as an Airman Basic (E-1) on  21  August
1975 after serving three years, one month, and eighteen days.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial.  DPPRS states  that  the  discharge  was
consistent with the procedural and  substantive  requirements  of  the
discharge regulation  and  within  the  discretionary  powers  of  the
discharge  authority.   Additionally,   no   new   evidence   or   any
identification of error or injustice has been presented to  warrant  a
change to the discharge.

DPPRS’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
22 August 2003 for review and comment within  30  days.   As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review  of  the
evidence of record and applicant's submission, we  are  not  persuaded
that his uncorroborated assertions regarding the AF  offering  him  an
early out as part of a larger reduction in force towards  the  end  of
the Vietnam War, in and  by  themselves,  sufficiently  persuasive  to
override the rationale provided by the Air Force.  It is apparent from
the record that the action taken against the applicant  was  based  on
his  own  misconduct.   Therefore,  we  agree  with  the  opinion  and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary  responsibility  and
adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision  that  the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden of having  suffered  either
an error or injustice; and, in the absence of persuasive  evidence  to
the contrary, we find no compelling basis to  recommend  granting  the
relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-02432  in  Executive  Session  on  22  October  2003,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
      Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
      Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Jul 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 14 Aug 03.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Aug 03.




                                   MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01333

    Original file (BC-2003-01333.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 August 1975, applicant received an Article 15 for failure to report for duty. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPPPWB reviewed this application regarding the request for a change of his grade on his DD Form 214 from Amn to A1C and recommended denial. He contends that he received two Letters of Reprimand (LOR’s), not two Article 15’s.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03969

    Original file (BC-2002-03969.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied. The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 13 March 2003, applicant responded to a Board’s request for legal proof of death by providing a copy of her husband’s death certificate (See Exhibit D). While the possibility exists that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200157

    Original file (0200157.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-00157 INDEX CODE 100.06 110.02 COUNSELS: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1985 general discharge be upgraded to honorable and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2B” (Separated with a general or under-other-than-honorable conditions discharge) be changed so that he can enlist in the Army. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03639

    Original file (BC-2003-03639.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 December 2003 for review and response within 30 days. However, as of this date, this office has received no response. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00438

    Original file (BC-2003-00438.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following information was obtained from the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Hearing Record. On 17 Nov 00, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for a change to the reason and authority for the discharge. After careful review of the available records and the information contained in the Air Force Discharge Review Board Hearing Record, the applicant’s discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00959

    Original file (BC-2003-00959.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The person told him that he would be able to reenlist as his discharge was a General discharge. On 26 June 2002, applicant was notified that he was being discharged under the auspices of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208, for unsatisfactory duty performance and minor disciplinary infractions. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that his uncorroborated assertions of an increase in maturity, in and of itself, sufficiently...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02860

    Original file (BC-2003-02860.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Recommendation Letter and Legal Review could not be found in the available records. As he has provided no facts warranting a change in his discharge, denial is recommended. After a thorough review of the evidence of record, we conclude the general discharge was appropriate given the applicant’s misconduct and that the RE code, which was driven by the discharge, is correct.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03662

    Original file (BC-2005-03662.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 April 1986, he reported late for duty and received an LOR. DPPRS concludes the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred during the discharge process, and provided no facts warranting a change to his character of service. After careful consideration of the available evidence and in the absence of evidence by the applicant to the contrary, we believe that the actions taken to effect his discharge were proper and in compliance with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01156

    Original file (BC-2003-01156.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 August 1980, the applicant received notification that he was being recommended for discharge. - 6 August 1980, Notification of Intent to Vacate Suspended 15 May 1980 Nonjudicial Punishment (Article 15) for failure to go to appointed place of duty, on or about 3 August 1980, in violation of Article 86, UCMJ. Applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable was denied by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 28 May 1991.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04057

    Original file (BC-2002-04057.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 February 1984, the applicant received notification that he was being recommended for discharge for misconduct. On 13 March 1984, the discharge authority approved the recommended separation and directed that the applicant be issued a general discharge. On 3 March 1985, the applicant applied to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) to have his RE code of 2B changed.