RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02432
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His general (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be changed to
honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He took advantage of an Air Force (AF) Early Out program at the end of
the Vietnam War. Senator Goldwater wrote a letter on his behalf and
he was subsequently accepted at Arizona State University pursuant to
USAF directives, and, he was told that his general discharge would be
changed to honorable. He would like to take advantage of all benefits
accorded to an honorably discharged veteran of the Vietnam era.
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided a personal
statement and copies of DD Form 293, Application for the Review of
Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States, the
DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, his general
discharge certificate and a letter of support from the Veterans of
Foreign Wars (VFW).
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 14
July 1972. He attained the grade of Airman First Class (A1C/E-3). He
received a letter of Reprimand (LOR) on 30 August 1973 for failing to
obey the orders of his superior. On or about 1 November 1973, he was
found with a tablet of methaqualone and received another LOR. He
received an LOR on 24 April 1974 after an inspection of his dormitory
room was found to be in violation of base fire regulations. On 20
January 1975, he received a LOR after an inspection of his room that
found it to be in complete disarray. On 20 March 1975, he received a
LOR for smoking marijuana while performing Charge of Quarters duty.
He received an Article 15 on 4 June 1975 for using disrespectful
language against a non-commissioned officer and was fined $50. He was
notified on 4 August 1975 that he was being recommended for discharge
in accordance with Air Force Regulation (AFR) 39-12, Unsuitability-
Apathy, Defective Attitude and Inability to Expend Effort
Constructively. He was evaluated on 13 August 1975 whereupon the
evaluating officer recommended the applicant be discharged immediately
and that he be furnished a general discharge certificate. Probation
and rehabilitation (P&R) was considered but deemed inappropriate. He
declined to submit statements on his behalf and declined legal
counsel. The base legal office found the discharge legally
sufficient. He was discharged as an Airman Basic (E-1) on 21 August
1975 after serving three years, one month, and eighteen days.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS states that the discharge was
consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the
discharge regulation and within the discretionary powers of the
discharge authority. Additionally, no new evidence or any
identification of error or injustice has been presented to warrant a
change to the discharge.
DPPRS’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
22 August 2003 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded
that his uncorroborated assertions regarding the AF offering him an
early out as part of a larger reduction in force towards the end of
the Vietnam War, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive to
override the rationale provided by the Air Force. It is apparent from
the record that the action taken against the applicant was based on
his own misconduct. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and
adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden of having suffered either
an error or injustice; and, in the absence of persuasive evidence to
the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-02432 in Executive Session on 22 October 2003, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Jul 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 14 Aug 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Aug 03.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01333
On 13 August 1975, applicant received an Article 15 for failure to report for duty. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPPPWB reviewed this application regarding the request for a change of his grade on his DD Form 214 from Amn to A1C and recommended denial. He contends that he received two Letters of Reprimand (LOR’s), not two Article 15’s.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03969
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied. The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 13 March 2003, applicant responded to a Board’s request for legal proof of death by providing a copy of her husband’s death certificate (See Exhibit D). While the possibility exists that the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-00157 INDEX CODE 100.06 110.02 COUNSELS: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1985 general discharge be upgraded to honorable and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2B” (Separated with a general or under-other-than-honorable conditions discharge) be changed so that he can enlist in the Army. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03639
The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 December 2003 for review and response within 30 days. However, as of this date, this office has received no response. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00438
The following information was obtained from the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Hearing Record. On 17 Nov 00, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for a change to the reason and authority for the discharge. After careful review of the available records and the information contained in the Air Force Discharge Review Board Hearing Record, the applicant’s discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00959
The person told him that he would be able to reenlist as his discharge was a General discharge. On 26 June 2002, applicant was notified that he was being discharged under the auspices of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208, for unsatisfactory duty performance and minor disciplinary infractions. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that his uncorroborated assertions of an increase in maturity, in and of itself, sufficiently...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02860
The Recommendation Letter and Legal Review could not be found in the available records. As he has provided no facts warranting a change in his discharge, denial is recommended. After a thorough review of the evidence of record, we conclude the general discharge was appropriate given the applicant’s misconduct and that the RE code, which was driven by the discharge, is correct.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03662
On 10 April 1986, he reported late for duty and received an LOR. DPPRS concludes the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred during the discharge process, and provided no facts warranting a change to his character of service. After careful consideration of the available evidence and in the absence of evidence by the applicant to the contrary, we believe that the actions taken to effect his discharge were proper and in compliance with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01156
On 26 August 1980, the applicant received notification that he was being recommended for discharge. - 6 August 1980, Notification of Intent to Vacate Suspended 15 May 1980 Nonjudicial Punishment (Article 15) for failure to go to appointed place of duty, on or about 3 August 1980, in violation of Article 86, UCMJ. Applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable was denied by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 28 May 1991.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04057
On 16 February 1984, the applicant received notification that he was being recommended for discharge for misconduct. On 13 March 1984, the discharge authority approved the recommended separation and directed that the applicant be issued a general discharge. On 3 March 1985, the applicant applied to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) to have his RE code of 2B changed.