Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01939
Original file (BC-2003-01939.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-01939
                                       INDEX CODE:  110.02
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX                    COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXXXXXXX                           HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general discharge be upgraded to honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was told that his  discharge  could  be  upgraded  after  3  years.   The
applicant provided no evidence in support of his  appeal.   The  applicant’s
complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 20 July 1983, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the  age
of 18 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period  of  four  years.   He
was trained as an Apprentice Fire Protection Specialist.  The applicant  was
progressively promoted to the grade of airman first  class  (E-3)  effective
and with a date of rank of 1  September  1983.   He  received  two  enlisted
performance reports covering the period 20  July  1983  through  11  October
1984, both with overall ratings of seven.

The applicant received two Letters of  Reprimand  (LOR),  three  Letters  of
Counseling (LOC), a Memo for Record (MFR) and a  verbal  counseling  between
the  dates  4  November  1983   and   11   October   1984,   for   financial
irresponsibility, tardiness and  use  of  a  controlled  substance.   On  11
September 1984, the applicant  received  an  Article  15  punishment  for  a
conviction of drunken and disorderly conduct.  As punishment, the  applicant
received reduction to the grade of airman (E-2) with a new date of  rank  of
17 September 1984 and 14 days of extra duty.

On 11 October 1984, his commander recommended  the  applicant  be  separated
with general discharge under AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-47b,  without  probation
and rehabilitation for conduct prejudicial to  good  order  and  discipline.
The  applicant  acknowledged  receipt,  consulted  military   counsel,   and
submitted a  statement  in  his  own  behalf.   On  13  November  1984,  the
recommendation was found to be legally sufficient  by  the  assistant  staff
judge advocate.  On 26 November 1984, the discharge authority  approved  the
discharge and ordered a  general  discharge  under  AFR  39-10,  Chapter  5,
Section H, paragraph 5-47b.   The  applicant  was  discharged  effective  30
November 1984 with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge  with  a
reentry code of 2B and a separation code of JKM (misconduct).  He  served  1
year, 4 months and 11 days on active duty.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial.  DPPRS states the  applicant’s  discharge  was
consistent  with  the  procedural  and  substantive  requirements   of   the
discharge regulation in affect at that time and was  within  the  discretion
of the discharge authority.   Additionally,  there  are  no  regulations  or
directives that  allow  for  an  automatic  upgrade  of  a  discharge.   The
applicant did not provide any facts warranting an upgrade of his  discharge,
nor did he submit any new evidence or  identify  any  errors  or  injustices
that occurred in his discharge  processing.   The  DPPRS  evaluation  is  at
Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on  11
July 2003 for review and response (Exhibit D).   As  of  this  date,  this
office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of probable error or injustice.  The applicant  did  not  provide
persuasive evidence showing the  information  in  the  discharge  case  was
erroneous, his substantial rights were violated,  or  that  his  commanders
abused their discretionary authority.  The  characterization  of  discharge
which was issued at the  time  of  the  applicant’s  separation  accurately
reflects the circumstances of  his  separation  and  we  do  not  find  the
characterization of discharge to be in error or unjust.   In  view  of  the
foregoing and in the absence of evidence by the applicant  attesting  to  a
successful post-service adjustment in the years since  his  separation,  we
are not inclined to extend clemency in this case.  Therefore,  we  conclude
that no basis exists upon  which  to  recommend  favorable  action  on  his
request that it be changed.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 11 September 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
      Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
      Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member


The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR  Docket  Number  BC-2003-01939
was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 Jun 2003.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 7 Jul 2003.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jul 2003.




                                  RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02993

    Original file (BC-2003-02993.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02993 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01888

    Original file (BC-2004-01888.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. On 3 October 1983, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) for failure to report. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the reasons that were stated for his discharge are not accurate. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2004-01888 in Executive Session on 21 October 2004, under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00069

    Original file (BC-2004-00069.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted a request to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his under honorable conditions (general) discharge upgraded to honorable. Based on the information and evidence provided they recommend the applicant's request be denied. Based on the documentation in the applicant's records, it appears that the processing of the discharge and the characterization of the discharge were appropriate and accomplished in accordance with Air Force policy.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01676

    Original file (BC-2003-01676.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    While this may be used as a basis for discharge, it cannot be considered for characterization of the discharge. On 23 March 1988, the Air Force Discharge Review Board reviewed and denied the applicant's request for upgrade. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his discharge should be upgraded to honorable.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01163

    Original file (BC-2004-01163.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received seven Airman Performance Reports closing 23 December 1979, 31 August 1980, 30 March 1981, 31 July 1981, 15 May 1982, 15 May 1983, and 18 January 1984, of which the overall evaluations were “9,” “8,” “8,” “8,”, “9,” “8,” and “4.” On 19 January 1984, applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending discharge from the Air Force for patterns of misconduct. On 17 February 1984, applicant was notified by the commander that he was recommending an under other than honorable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00120

    Original file (BC-2005-00120.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, indicated they were unable to identify with an arrest record on the basis of the information furnished - Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records. They believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01190

    Original file (BC-2004-01190.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01190 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable and her narrative reason for separation be changed to misconduct-general. But, it is our opinion that a general (under other than honorable conditions)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02163

    Original file (BC-2004-02163.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02163 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. However, he has provided no evidence showing his discharge was improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation at the time it was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03012

    Original file (BC-2002-03012.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03012 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Although the pathology report of removed tissues were consistent with Crohn’s Disease, medical records between the time of his August 1985 hospital discharge and his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03012

    Original file (BC-2002-03012.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03012 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Although the pathology report of removed tissues were consistent with Crohn’s Disease, medical records between the time of his August 1985 hospital discharge and his...