RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01700
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: THE AMERICAN LEGION
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His narrative reason for separation be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He desires his narrative reason for separation be corrected to show he was
discharged for fraudulent entry into the military service and not for
misconduct - homosexual actions.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided an excerpt of his Air
Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Brief, undated.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 11 November 1946, prior to the applicant’s enlistment he was convicted
by the State of Michigan for unarmed robbery. He was placed on probation
for two years, probation to be terminated 7 November 1947.
The applicant enlisted in the United States Army on 23 July 1947 in the
grade of private.
After an investigation by the Adjutant General, consisting of a report from
the State of Michigan, his commander recommended he be discharged for
fraudulent entry based on his felony conviction and subsequent probation.
On 9 January 1948 the Adjutant General indicated that the applicant’s
enlistment record shows that at the time of enlistment he denied having
been convicted by a civil court, of a felony or any offense and also denied
having ever been imprisoned under sentence of a civil court.
On 20 January 1948 the applicant indicated in a written statement that
prior to entering the Air Force he was arrested on or about 11 March 1946
in Detroit for robbery and in March 1947 for stealing a case of wine from a
drug store.
In June 1948 the commander of the XXXX Air Force Base Unit, Mather Air
Force Base, California, indicated that the applicant was adjudged guilty of
robbery, unarmed, 11 November 1946, which is a felony under the laws of the
State of Michigan; he was put on probation by the Circuit Court of Wayne
County, Michigan, which probation terminated 7 November 1947. The
applicant enlisted 23 July 1947 at Dearborn, Michigan and, so far as the
records, which were available, showed, without having disclosed his past
record. The commander further indicated that the juvenile authorities
waived jurisdiction and the proceedings were in the Circuit Court, and
under the laws of Michigan the applicant would be considered as having a
criminal record.
On 9 June 1948 the applicant received an undesirable discharge in the grade
of private, under the provisions of AR 615-366 (Conviction by a Civil
Court). He served a total of 10 months and 17 days total active service
with 14 days lost time.
On 18 July 1979, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered
and granted the applicant’s request to upgrade his undesirable discharge to
general (under honorable conditions). The AFDRB concluded that the
discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements
of the discharge regulation and was within the sound discretion of the
discharge authority. The Board further concluded that the applicant’s
discharge should be changed to general under the provisions of AFR 39-12,
chapter 2, section D and he was issued a new DD Form 214 - Report of
Separation From Active Duty.
EXAMINER’S NOTE: The AFDRB Hearing Record indicates that the applicant
should receive a general discharge. They indicate on AFHQ Form 0-2077,
page one, that the provisions of the discharge is AFR 39-12, Chapter Two,
Section B which indicates discharge for misconduct, homosexual acts -
waiver of Board Hearing and on page two of the same form they indicate the
provisions of the discharge to be AFR 39-12, Chapter Two, Section D which
indicates discharge for misconduct because of fraudulent enlistment. The
DD Form 214 indicates the reason for discharge to be “Involuntary
Discharge, Misconduct, Homosexual Acts - Waiver of Board Hearing.” It
appears there was a typographical error between what the Board concluded
and what the DD Form 214 indicates.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS indicated that based upon the documentation in the file, they
believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the discharge regulation. Additionally, the discharge was
within the discretion of the discharge authority. The AFDRB upgraded the
applicant’s discharge and he was issued a new DD Form 214. However, they
believe the authority and narrative reason used are incorrect. It reads
authority as “AFM 39-12” and narrative reason as “Involuntary Discharge,
Misconduct, Homosexual Acts, Waiver of Board Hearing” with a separation
program designator (SPD) code “HKC.”
If the AFBCMR grants relief, they recommend the applicant be issued a new
DD Form 214 and change the authority to AFI 36-3208, Administrative
Separation of Airmen, and narrative reason for discharge to “Fraudulent
Entry into Military Service” with SPD code “JDA”. Under current policy, if
a member is separated for fraudulent entry, they are not credited with time
served. He has not filed a timely request.
The evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 27 June 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. The applicant was discharged in 1948
with an undesirable discharge for fraudulent entry into the military for
failing to disclose his civil court conviction prior to entry on active
duty. On 18 July 1979, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB)
upgraded his discharge to general (under honorable conditions) on the basis
of his entire record and his testimony. The AFDRB found the applicant was
immature, inarticulate, uneducated, with very low aptitude scores and
therefore, concluded that a general discharge was more appropriate.
However, apparently when the new DD Form 214 was issued, as a result of a
typographical error on the AFDRB Hearing Record, the narrative reason for
his discharge was listed as Misconduct for Homosexual Acts. Clearly this
was an unfortunate error that has only just now been discovered.
Therefore, equity dictates that his records be corrected; however, if the
narrative reason for discharge indicates fraudulent reasons, it is very
likely that he would not be credited for the time he served and this could
be detrimental to the applicant. Therefore, to remove any possibility of
an injustice to the applicant, we believe that his records should be
corrected to show that the narrative reason for his discharge was for
convenience of the government and this we so recommend.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 9 June 1948, he was discharged
under the provisions of AR 615-365 with a general discharge for convenience
of the government.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-
01700 in Executive Session on 21 August 2003, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Panel Chair
Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
Mr. E. David Hoard, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 February 2003, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 23 June 2003.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 June 2003.
PATRICIA D. VESTAL
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-01700
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to , be corrected to show that on 9 June 1948, he was
discharged under the provisions of AR 615-365 with a general discharge for
convenience of the government.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
While a statement from the recruiter would be helpful in resolving this issue, since the applicant was arrested while a juvenile and was released, we do not believe he intend to fraudulently enlist. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected to the extent indicated below. Exhibit B.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002946
The applicant requests an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to a general discharge. He stated that: * he informed a recruiter about his attempted armed robbery that he had committed as a teenager along with other offenses * the recruiter requested a waiver that was denied * no record was found of attempted armed robbery because he was under the Youthful Offenders Act and First Offenders Act * the recruiter suggested that he wait 3 months and try another branch of service and that he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009455
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record confirms that both the FSM and his mother provided the recruiter a copy of the FSMs Certificate of Baptism to confirm that he was at least 17 years of age at the time of his 1 December 1947 enlistment in the Army, as evidenced by the 29 November 1947 notarized affidavit on file. In addition, the FSM was found to be mentally and physically fit for military service by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063615C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He had completed 1 year, 9 months, and 12 days of active military service. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019025
Also available are the following: certificate of birth for R____ E____ R____; physical and mental examination for R____, R____ J____; WD AGO Form 53-59 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Undesirable Discharge) for R____, R____ J.; numerous discharge related documents; summary of neuropsychiatric evaluations of R____, R____ J., dated 1 November 1948; Mental Hygiene Consultation Services, 9th Infantry Division, Fort Dix, New Jersey, progress notes, dated 6 October 1949; certificate of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008083
On 6 February 1970, the unit commander recommended discharge of the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 by reason of civil conviction. On 28 December 1977, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), after careful consideration of the applicant's case, denied his request for an upgrade of his UD. Further, the applicant's discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service for the charges he was convicted of and does not support an upgrade of his discharge.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02142
On 7 Mar 79, the Staff Judge Advocate reviewed the Record of Administrative Discharge Board proceedings and found it legally sufficient to support discharge with a recommendation to the 42 CSG/CC that the applicant be discharged for misconduct, with a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation. On 21 Dec 81, the applicant was notified that his application for review of discharge and military records was forwarded to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) of the Secretary...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02415
On 13 March 1953, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge under the authority of Air Force Regulation 39-21, for fraudulent entry into the Air Force by concealment of prior service. Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post-service activities. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002085638C070215
The regulation states that an individual separated under this regulation will be furnished an honorable or general discharge. The Board considered the applicant's request to change his discharge to Army Regulation 615-365 or Army Regulation 615-360. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that the reason and authority for separation issued to him was in error or unjust.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01012
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 27 December 1948 in the grade of private for a period of three years. A letter from applicant’s commanding officer dated 5 December 1949, requests he be discharged prior to expiration term of service (ETS) - reason - convicted by Civil Court on charge of burglary and larceny. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of...