Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01361
Original file (BC-2003-01361.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-01361
            INDEX CODE:  137.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His  participation  in  the  Survivor   Benefit   Plan   (SBP)   be
discontinued.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He called the SBP office twice in the past  year  checking  on  the
date in which he would be able to cancel the SBP plan.  He was told
both times that he would not be  able  to  cancel  the  plan  until
1 Apr 03.  So, he waited and called on 1 Apr 03 to  check  on  what
paperwork he would need to fill out in order to  cancel  the  plan.
He was told he would not be able to cancel his plan because he  had
missed the one-year window of opportunity.

He believes that because of miscounseling, he should be  given  the
opportunity to cancel his plan.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant elected  spouse  only  SBP  coverage  based  on  full
retired pay prior to his 1 Mar 00 retirement.  He was  eligible  to
disenroll between 1 Mar 02 and 28 Feb  03;  however,  there  is  no
evidence he requested disenrollment.  On 21 Apr 03, he was asked to
complete a DD Form 2656-2, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)  Termination
Request, and provide a  properly  notarized  concurrence  statement
from his wife; however, he has not responded.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPTR reviewed the application and recommended denial.  Public
Law (PL) 105-85 provides a one-year period, beginning on the second
anniversary of the date of  commencement  of  retired  pay,  during
which SBP participants may choose to voluntarily discontinue  their
participation.  Retirees must complete a DD Form 2656-2 and  obtain
the spouse’s notarized consent.  Disenrollments are effective  upon
receipt of a properly completed request by DFAS-CL, postmarked  not
later than the member’s third anniversary of receiving retired pay.
 The law does not require the retirees be notified at the beginning
of the one-year period and there is no refund of premiums.  If  the
retiree fails to exercise the disenrollment option during the  one-
year period, the  SBP  election  is  considered  permanent  and  is
irrevocable as long as the beneficiary remains eligible.

DPPTR could  not  confirm  or  deny  the  member’s  claim  that  he
contacted an SBP office twice  in  the  past  year  and  was  given
erroneous disenrollment information.  However, the  election  form,
which he signed three months prior to his retirement,  contained  a
specific statement that retiring members have been counseled on the
disenrollment option.   Information  and  points  of  contact  were
published in the Afterburner,  News  for  USAF  Retired  Personnel,
reminding retirees of the one-year  opportunity  to  terminate  SBP
coverage.  Records indicate this official newsletter was mailed  to
the address where the applicant continues  to  reside.   PL  105-85
contains no provision for waiving or extending the one-year  period
authorized  to  terminate   participation.    Providing   applicant
additional time to terminate his coverage would be  inequitable  to
other retirees in similar situations.

A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at  Exhibit
C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 25 Jul 03 for review and comment within 30  days.   As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of  the
Air  Force  office  of  primary  responsibility  and  adopt   their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that  the  applicant  has
not been the victim of an error or injustice.   Therefore,  in  the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket  Number
BC-2003-01361 in Executive Session on 30 September 2003, under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel Chair
      Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Member
      Mr. Mike Novel, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 12 Apr 03.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPTR, dated 16 Jul 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Jul 03.




                                   DAVID C. VAN GASBECK
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003349

    Original file (0003349.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DFAS has no record of the applicant submitting a valid SBP disenrollment request during the authorized timeframe to submit a request to terminate his enrollment in SBP. In this respect, PL 105-85 provides a one-year window of opportunity to disenroll from the SBP provided the service member submits a completed DD Form 2656-2, with the notarized signature of the beneficiary concurring with the termination of the SBP. _________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103668

    Original file (0103668.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A xxxx informed him that all he would need to do was complete DD Form 2656-2, Termination of SBP Request, have his spouse sign the request and forward the completed form to DFAS for processing. The applicant contends that he was improperly counseled about the options of having SBP reinstated at a future date. The applicant wanted to terminate his SBP coverage for his spouse immediately.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0203122

    Original file (0203122.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Air Force stated that the applicant was married and elected child only SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to his 12 May 83 disability retirement. If a member withdraws under this provision, there is no immediate refund of premiums; however, applicable spouse premiums paid by the member can be refunded to the spouse following the member’s death. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01548

    Original file (BC-2003-01548.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since he was married and had dependent children at the time, he was automatically enrolled for full spouse and child coverage under the SBP. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that relief should be granted. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-01548 in Executive Session on 30 September 2003 under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Mr....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9902332

    Original file (9902332.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's complete submission, which includes a notarized statement from his current spouse requesting disenrollment, is attached at Exhibit A. If the Board recommends granting the request, his record should be corrected to show he disenrolled from the SBP under the provisions of PL 105-85, effective 16 May 1999, with his wife’s concurrence. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01550

    Original file (BC-2003-01550.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The letter also explained that if she agreed with her husband’s child only election, she must sign and date the DD Form 2656 in the presence of a notary or a Military Personnel Flight (MPF) representative, and the form must be returned before her husband’s retirement date or maximum spouse coverage and costs will take effect. The applicant’s wife signed the election form eighteen days after his retirement date, evidence that the letter was received, and her signature was notarized in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01495

    Original file (BC-2003-01495.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. He did not complete the documents necessary to properly establish his retired pay account (including an SBP election form) until after his retirement date; therefore, spouse and child coverage based on full retired pay was established to comply with the law. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03820

    Original file (BC-2005-03820.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 March 1999, the applicant submitted a request to terminate his SBP coverage under the provisions of PL 105-85. PL 108-375 authorized an open enrollment period from 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006 to enroll in SBP, but the law stipulates that servicemembers who terminated coverage under the provisions of PL 105-85 can not renter the program. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02485

    Original file (BC-2003-02485.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of an Air Force error or injustice, nor is there any basis in law to grant relief. In some states you are automatically divorced after such a length of time. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are unpersuaded that he should be allowed to terminate spouse coverage under the SBP.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01479

    Original file (BC-2003-01479.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since she elected maximum spouse coverage, her husband’s concurrence was not required. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 3 June 2003, for review and response.