RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00255 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be provided a waiver for his indebtedness to the Air Force as a result of being paid after he separated from active duty. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was unaware that he was being paid by the Air Force after he separated from active duty. He did not receive a Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) or other mail after he separated from active duty, because he began working as a civil service employee for the Air Force Academy in Colorado, and was separated from his wife and kids. He did not have access to bank statements, bills or mail that his wife was receiving in Arizona. He took a job overseas for the next three years and only learned of his indebtedness to the Air Force when he and his wife applied for a Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) home loan. His financial situation precludes him from being able to pay the debt to the Air Force. In support of the appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement, and several bank statements. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 21 May 97, for a period of four years. On 20 May 01, he was honorably released from active duty for completion of required active service. He completed a total of four years of active service. It appears the applicant was recalled to active duty and was released after his deployment on 30 Nov 02. He continued to receive bi-monthly payments of basic pay and allowances until 31 May 03, followed by a lump sum leave (LSL) entitlement in Oct 03. He was only entitled to $1,209.06, upon his separation on 30 Nov 02. He received payments issued beyond 30 Nov 02, that totaled $19,339.13, and created a debt of $18,130.07. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-IN recommends denial. DFAS/IN states the applicant separated from the Air Force on 20 Nov 02 after his deployment. Payments for basic pay and allowances were issued on a bi-monthly basis until 31 May 03, followed by a LSL entitlement in Oct 03. DFAS-IN states that as of May 01, all LESs for pay and allowances are available via internet access through the My Pay System. This system maintains LESs for the current month and 11 prior months. When the applicant was released from deployment at the end of Nov 02, a final payment for LSL should have been expected and the LES informing him of the payment. Non-receipt of a LES is not an acceptable response. Furthermore, the applicant did file a waiver request for this overpayment and his waiver request was denied. The complete DFAS/IN evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the DFAS evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 Jan 10, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of his submission and the available evidence of record, we are not persuaded the requested relief should be granted. We took notice of the complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. In view of the above and in the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2009-00255 in Executive Session on 13 May 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Jan 09, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, DFAS-IN, undated. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Jan 10. Panel Chair