RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03283
INDEX NUMBER: 110.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2C,
“Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level
separation without characterization of service,” to one that will allow
him to reenlist in military service.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He used drugs at a going away party before he entered service and has
not used drugs since that time. He also has not been in any other
trouble.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered active duty on 22 Mar 00. On 10 Apr 00, the
applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending the
applicant’s discharge from the Air Force for fraudulent entry and that
if approved, his discharge would be described as an entry level
separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air
Force. The reason for the commander’s action was the applicant
intentionally concealed prior service drug use, which if revealed,
could have resulted in rejection of the applicant’s enlistment.
Specifically, the applicant, on 18 Feb 00, executed an AF Form 2030
(USAF Drug Certificate) and indicated that he used or experimented with
marijuana and never used or possessed any illegal drug or narcotic. On
22 Mar 00, the applicant certified that he had not used any drug,
including marijuana, since he originally completed the form. On 25 Mar
00, the applicant submitted a urine sample, which, on 3 Apr 00, was
determined to be positive for marijuana.
The applicant acknowledged receipt of the discharge recommendation on
10 Apr 00 and waived his right to counsel. On 13 Apr 00, the applicant
was discharged from the Air Force with an entry-level separation with
uncharacterized service.
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The applicant
did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices
that occurred in the discharge process.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE verified that the RE code given the applicant was correct.
They make no recommendation regarding his request.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
14 Feb 03 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response
has not been received.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we
agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of
primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2002-
03283 in Executive Session on 15 April 2003, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Panel Chair
Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Member
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Oct 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 4 Nov 02.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 3 Feb 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Feb 03.
ROBERT S. BOYD
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00437
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00437 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C” be changed to allow his enlistment into either the Army or Air Force. On 19 June 1998, he received an uncharacterized entry-level separation under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Fraudulent Entry into...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03756
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03756 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to 3K, and the narrative reason for separation be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Secretarial Authority.” _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02638
On 26 Feb 02, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending that the applicant be discharged for conditions that interfere with military service, mental and adjustment disorders. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Medical Consultant recommended denial noting that enlistment bonuses are recoupable provided the member is separating voluntarily, is being separated for misconduct, or for other specified administrative...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00446
The discharge authority approved the request for discharge (in lieu of court- martial) and ordered a UOTHC discharge on 22 August 1984. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. After careful consideration of the available evidence, we found no indication that the actions taken to effect his discharge were improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing regulations in effect at the time, or that the actions...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03603
On 2 Nov 95, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend discharge for a pattern of misconduct. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02447
He was subsequently discharged from the AF with an entry-level separation and service characterization of uncharacterized, as he had not served for 180 days at the time of discharge. Additionally, he provided no facts warranting a change in his discharge. Consequently, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01037
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial and stated that airmen are given entry- level separation/uncharacterized service characterization when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service. After careful consideration of the circumstances of this case and the evidence provided by the applicant, we are not persuaded that the applicant's discharge and the reenlistment code he received...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03735
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03735 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C,” “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge: or entry level separation without characterization of service,” be changed to RE Code...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03241
On 29 Aug 00, the applicant received notification that she was being recommended for discharge for erroneous enlistment. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s submission, we are unpersuaded that the requested relief should be approved.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00236 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so he can go back into the Air Force. The commander advised the applicant that if his recommendation was approved, his discharge would be described as an entry-level separation and he...