Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02001
Original file (BC-2002-02001.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-02001
            INDEX CODE:  100.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His name be changed from  to   in his military personnel records.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His surname was misspelled throughout his military  service.   He  was
told to spell it that way because his original birth  certificate  was
wrong.

In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a copy of his DD Form
257AF (discharge certificate), DD Form 214 (Report of Separation  from
the Armed Forces of the United States), and a Amended  Certificate  of
Live Birth.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 30 January 1955 for
a period of four (4) years.

A review of the applicant’s military records indicates that he  signed
his name  “             ”  on  his  Report  of  Medical  History,  his
Enlistment Record, AF Form 4, his Service Record, DD Form 230, and  on
his Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the  United  States,
DD Form 214.

On 4 May 1956, the applicant was discharged with service characterized
as general (under honorable conditions), in the grade of airman  third
class, under the provisions of AFR 39-16.  He  served  a  total  of  1
year, 3 months and 5 days of total active military service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPSAMP recommended denial.  They indicated  that  the  amended
birth certificate  the  applicant  provided  is  not  an  original  or
certified copy, therefore, it does not meet the legal requirements  to
be used as a source document.

A review of the applicant’s master personnel record reveals  that  the
applicant  acknowledged  the  spelling  of  his  name  as  Donald   E.
Pelletiere by signing both his DD Form 4, Enlistment  Record  –  Armed
Forces of the United States and his DD Form 214, Report of  Separation
from the Armed Forces of the United States.  The  applicant  currently
has no affiliation with the Air  Force  as  a  Retiree  or  Reservist.
According to Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Military Personnel Records
System, they cannot correct the records of former members  to  reflect
changes occurring after discharge.  In response to a previous request,
they had asked the applicant to provide a certified copy of the  birth
certificate reflecting the correct spelling of his  last  name  before
they could make the requested  change.   The  applicant  has  not  yet
provided them the requested documentation.

The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The  applicant  reviewed  the  evaluation  and   provided   additional
documentation which is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for  our  conclusion  that  the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  The birth
certificate the applicant provided is not an original or “raised seal”
certified copy, therefore it does  not  meet  the  legal  requirements
according to Air Force Instruction 36-2608, to be  used  as  a  source
document.  The Board would like to point out  that  if  the  applicant
submits a certified copy with raised seal or an original copy  of  his
amended birth certificate they would be willing to review his case for
possible reconsideration.  Without the proper documents,  we  are  not
persuaded to change the applicant’s record.  Therefore, in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to  recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of  an  error  or  an  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
02001 in Executive Session on 14 January 2003, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Member
                 Mr. George Franklin, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 June 2002, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSAMP, dated 2 December 2002,
                 w/atch.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 December 2002.




                       CHARLES E. BENNETT
                       Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-03667

    Original file (BC-2001-03667.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She married on 6 October 2001 and was unable to update this form before her separation date on 16 November 2001. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 August & 20 September 2002.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03466

    Original file (BC-2002-03466.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03466 INDEX CODE: 100.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The inaccurate spelling of his name in his record be corrected from “B---sz” to “B---rz.” ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00375

    Original file (BC-2006-00375.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSO states the divorce decree the applicant provided is not an original or certified copy; therefore, it does not meet the legal requirements to be used as a source document. Air Force Instructions 36-2608, military Personnel Records System, Table A7.2, Rule 2, states the documentation required to change or correct a name as a result of divorce is the original or certified copy of the divorce decree. _________________________________________________________________ The following members...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02148

    Original file (BC 2014 02148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02148 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States, be corrected to reflect the following: a. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02216

    Original file (BC-2010-02216.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200099

    Original file (0200099.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    HQ AFPC/DPSAMP completed the AF Form 281 to change his name on the Air Force file for any contact purpose. The DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, is only used to correct an error on the DD Form 214 if it was in error at the time of discharge. He provided several documents to substantiate his claim of the correct spelling of his name.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00721

    Original file (BC-2012-00721.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 Sep 12, AFPC/DPSOR notified the applicant that IAW AFI 36- 3202, Separation Documents they cannot add the statement “Vietnam Era Veteran” to his DD Form 214; however, his Kuwait Liberation Medal has been amended to read Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait (KLM-K) and will be administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his name in his military personnel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01048

    Original file (BC-2007-01048.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She changed her last name in December 2006 to her married name and would now like her military records changed to reflect her married name. A letter was sent to the applicant on 16 Apr 07 requesting that she provide either the original or a certified copy of the marriage certificate. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019664

    Original file (20110019664.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02316

    Original file (BC-2001-02316.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSAMP recommended denial of the applicant’s request for a name change. If the court order was dated on or before the applicant’s discharge date, a correction would be possible. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...