RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-00691
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His general, under honorable conditions, discharge be upgraded to
honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He had notified his squadron of personal problems such as losing his
job and losing his transportation. He would like to finish his career
in the Mississippi Air National Guard (MS ANG).
His appeal is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
ANG/DPPI made several attempts to acquire records on the applicant
from the Texas ANG (TX ANG) and have been unsuccessful. It appears
that the applicant was a member of the TX ANG and was discharged in
1999 for lack of participation.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ANG/DPFP recommends denial. DPFP states that the applicant had
originally been a member of the TX ANG. At his enlistment, applicant
had been informed that satisfactory participation in Unit Training
Assemblies (UTAs) was required and that his failure to satisfy this
requirement would result in his separation.
ANG/DPPF’s evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
28 March 2003 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. Based upon the presumption of
regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs and without evidence
to the contrary, we must assume that the applicant's discharge was
proper and in compliance with appropriate directives. We will,
however, reconsider the applicant’s request should he provide any post
service or other additional, pertinent information. Otherwise, based
on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to
favorably consider this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2002-00691 in Executive Session on 6 May 2003, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
Ms. Mary J. Johnson, Member
Mr. Vaughn Schlunz, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Feb 02.
Exhibit B. Letter, ANG/DPFP, dated 14 Jun 02.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Mar 03.
ROSCOE HINTON, JR
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01874
Although the applicant was eliminated from SUPT, the Air Force and the --- ANG supported him in his efforts to complete navigator training. At the time of the applicant’s enrollment in SUPT, the ANG had not implemented the IFT program for Air National Guardsmen; however, the ANG determined the applicant possessed the necessary qualifications to enter SUPT training anyway. Even though the applicant was eliminated from SUPT, the ANG supported him to become a Navigator.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00080 INDEX NUMBER: 128.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The debt of $21, 527.78 he incurred for recoupment of Aviator Continuation Pay (ACP) be voided, deleted from his records, and all amounts previously paid toward this debt be refunded to him. We took notice of...
He enlisted in the Air National Guard (ANG) on 6 Dec 74 and continued his military service until he was discharged on 15 Apr 97 from the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, with a general discharge for a pattern of misconduct and fraudulent entry. (2) Between approximately Jan 95 and Aug 96, pursuant to the applicant’s direction and orders, government employees removed aluminum flooring from an Air National Guard (ANG) building, which was later sold by the applicant and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02423
The 139-day tour entitles the applicant to BAH-II and the 179-day tour entitles the applicant to BAH-I. However, if a member receives an order modification or extension of assignment, the prospective (new) period of active duty must be 140 days or more and BAH-I would start on the date of modification.” DPPI states the waiver was not approved prior to the 139-day point, nor was there an administrative oversight in cutting the orders causing a delay. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02395
Applicant’s NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, reflects that he received a general discharge on 31 May 2000 under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, para 3.21.3.2 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ANG/DPFP recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air National Guard...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02395
Applicant’s NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, reflects that he received a general discharge on 31 May 2000 under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, para 3.21.3.2 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ANG/DPFP recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air National Guard...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01054
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01054 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. DPP also notes the applicant’s NGB Form 22, item 24, is missing the term “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC).” The IL ANG has...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03004
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03004 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general, under other than honorable conditions, discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant was demoted to A1C with an effective and date of rank of 25 October 1994. DPFP notes also that based on the discharge record...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01016 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1998 general discharge from the Air National Guard (ANG) be upgraded to honorable. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable injustice regarding the applicant’s request to have his general...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03701
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03701 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to show a favorable discharge and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and to either be compensated monetarily or be credited for 20 years of service. ...