RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02152
INDEX NUMBER: 110.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her entry-level discharge be changed to an honorable, general under
honorable conditions, or she be given a medical discharge.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust
and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.
_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force found at Exhibit C.
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant’s
request. Airmen are in entry-level status during the first 180 days of
continuous active military service and if administratively separated
during this period receive an entry-level separation. Personality
Disorders are unsuiting conditions that do not qualify for entry into
the disability evaluation system. An individual’s service is not
characterized if separated administratively during the entry-level
status period.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4
Oct 02 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response has
not been received.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-02152 in
Executive Session on 5 November 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
Ms. Kathleen Graham, Member
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Jul 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, BCMR Medical Consultant,
dated 28 Aug 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 4 Oct 02.
JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01023
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01023 INDEX CODE: 112.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) and her separation codes be changed to enable her to re-enter the Air Force. On 31 July 2001, the applicant’s commander recommended the applicant be discharged for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02788
The applicant disagreed with the Board’s findings and requested a formal hearing of his case. His rebuttal requested that his medical condition be evaluated as 40 percent disabling or higher. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6 Dec 02 for review and comment within 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00384
The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant also reviewed this application and is of the opinion that no change in the records is warranted. Following a medical workup and reviews by the Medical Board and the IPEB, it was determined that he was unfit to perform his duties. In view of the foregoing and absent persuasive evidence indicating the reports of the applicant’s symptoms and their affects on his ability to perform his duties were erroneous, or showing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01757
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01757 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be changed from “Erroneous Enlistment.” ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03161
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03161 INDEX NUMBER: 108.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 Apr 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability discharge with severance pay on 19 Jun 00 be changed to a medical retirement. On 28 Mar 00, an IPEB diagnosed the applicant with the unfitting condition of...
Applicant’s EPR profile follows: Period Ending Evaluation 7 Feb 95 5 7 Feb 96 4 7 Feb 97 4 AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this entire case file and determined that the applicant had appropriate evaluation and care prior to his separation from the military and that he did not exhibit symptoms of disorders for which he is currently being treated. A copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02601
On 7 Nov 88, the PEB found that the applicant was unfit for military service because of physical disability and recommended that he be discharged with severance pay based on a 20 percent disability rating. Unfitting medical conditions rated at 30 percent or higher by the PEB during the MEB process, are eligible for a disability retirement under disability laws and policy. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant was discharged from active duty on 25 November 1996 after serving 1 month and 17 days of active duty and received an Entry Level Separation, Uncharacterized, with a narrative reason for separation of (Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards) and an RE Code of “3A.” RE 3A reflects: “First-term, nonprior service, females who enlisted into the Air Force and ‘it was later discovered they...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01919
Medical record entries cannot be created by physicians who did not evaluate and treat the patient at the time of injury or illness, or for medical encounters that did not occur. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 June 2005 for review and response within 30 days. We took notice of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00480
She received two Officer Performance Reports during her time in the Air Force. Additional facts pertinent to this case are contained in the evaluations prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force found at Exhibits C and D. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends that the applicant’s discharge be upgrade to honorable with the reason for discharge remaining as misconduct since the applicant has not...