Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02152
Original file (BC-2002-02152.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-02152
            INDEX NUMBER:  110.00
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  COUNSEL:  None
      XXX-XX-XXXX      HEARING DESIRED:  No

_______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her entry-level discharge be changed  to  an  honorable,  general  under
honorable conditions, or she be given a medical discharge.

_______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or  unjust
and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.

_______________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application,  extracted  from  the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the  letter  prepared  by
the appropriate office of the Air Force found at Exhibit C.

_______________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The  BCMR  Medical  Consultant  recommends  denial  of  the  applicant’s
request.  Airmen are in entry-level status during the first 180 days  of
continuous active military service  and  if  administratively  separated
during this  period  receive  an  entry-level  separation.   Personality
Disorders are unsuiting conditions that do not qualify  for  entry  into
the disability  evaluation  system.   An  individual’s  service  is  not
characterized  if  separated  administratively  during  the  entry-level
status period.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant  on  4
Oct 02 for review and comment within 30 days.  To date, a  response  has
not been received.

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice.  We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of  an  error  or  injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented   did   not
demonstrate the existence of  material  error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without  a  personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-02152  in
Executive Session on 5 November 2002, under the provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
      Ms. Kathleen Graham, Member
      Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Jul 02, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Memorandum, BCMR Medical Consultant,
                dated 28 Aug 02.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 4 Oct 02.
                                   JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01023

    Original file (BC-2002-01023.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01023 INDEX CODE: 112.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) and her separation codes be changed to enable her to re-enter the Air Force. On 31 July 2001, the applicant’s commander recommended the applicant be discharged for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02788

    Original file (BC-2002-02788.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant disagreed with the Board’s findings and requested a formal hearing of his case. His rebuttal requested that his medical condition be evaluated as 40 percent disabling or higher. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6 Dec 02 for review and comment within 30 days.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00384

    Original file (BC-2002-00384.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant also reviewed this application and is of the opinion that no change in the records is warranted. Following a medical workup and reviews by the Medical Board and the IPEB, it was determined that he was unfit to perform his duties. In view of the foregoing and absent persuasive evidence indicating the reports of the applicant’s symptoms and their affects on his ability to perform his duties were erroneous, or showing the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01757

    Original file (BC-2002-01757.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01757 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be changed from “Erroneous Enlistment.” ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03161

    Original file (BC-2004-03161.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03161 INDEX NUMBER: 108.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 Apr 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability discharge with severance pay on 19 Jun 00 be changed to a medical retirement. On 28 Mar 00, an IPEB diagnosed the applicant with the unfitting condition of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9901223

    Original file (9901223.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s EPR profile follows: Period Ending Evaluation 7 Feb 95 5 7 Feb 96 4 7 Feb 97 4 AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this entire case file and determined that the applicant had appropriate evaluation and care prior to his separation from the military and that he did not exhibit symptoms of disorders for which he is currently being treated. A copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02601

    Original file (BC-2002-02601.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 Nov 88, the PEB found that the applicant was unfit for military service because of physical disability and recommended that he be discharged with severance pay based on a 20 percent disability rating. Unfitting medical conditions rated at 30 percent or higher by the PEB during the MEB process, are eligible for a disability retirement under disability laws and policy. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9802421

    Original file (9802421.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant was discharged from active duty on 25 November 1996 after serving 1 month and 17 days of active duty and received an Entry Level Separation, Uncharacterized, with a narrative reason for separation of (Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards) and an RE Code of “3A.” RE 3A reflects: “First-term, nonprior service, females who enlisted into the Air Force and ‘it was later discovered they...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01919

    Original file (BC-2004-01919.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical record entries cannot be created by physicians who did not evaluate and treat the patient at the time of injury or illness, or for medical encounters that did not occur. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 June 2005 for review and response within 30 days. We took notice of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00480

    Original file (BC-2002-00480.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She received two Officer Performance Reports during her time in the Air Force. Additional facts pertinent to this case are contained in the evaluations prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force found at Exhibits C and D. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends that the applicant’s discharge be upgrade to honorable with the reason for discharge remaining as misconduct since the applicant has not...