Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01099A
Original file (BC-2002-01099A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                                 ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01099

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC).

_________________________________________________________________

RESUME OF CASE:

On 30 May 2002, the Board considered applicant’s request for  award  of  the
DFC and Air Medal, Third Oak Leaf Cluster (AM,  3  OLC).   The  Board  found
sufficient evidence warranting award of the AM, 3 OLC.  However, in view  of
the 1944 change in the policy for award of the DFC, and in  the  absence  of
evidence that he was recommended and approved for  award  of  the  DFC,  the
Board  found  insufficient  evidence  to  recommend  awarding  him  the  DFC
(Exhibit E).

In a letter, dated 25 August 2002, the applicant  requested  reconsideration
of his request for  award  of  the  DFC  and  provided  additional  evidence
(Exhibit F).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After reviewing the additional documentation submitted by the applicant,  we
find sufficient relevant evidence has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice  warranting  award  of  the  DFC.   In  this
respect, we note that in 1944, the total number  of  missions  required  for
completion of a combat tour and award of a DFC was increased from 25 to  35.
 However, based on the documentation provided by the applicant,  it  appears
that individuals who began their combat tours in 1943 and   completed  their
25 missions sometime in 1944 were considered to have  completed  their  tour
of combat duty and were awarded the DFC.  In view of  this,  and  since  the
applicant did complete 25 combat  missions,  we  recommend  his  records  be
corrected to the extent indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 11 September 1944, he was  awarded
the Distinguished Flying Cross, for meritorious achievement,  while  serving
as an  Aerial  Gunner  and  Aircraft  Armorer  on  B-17  airplanes  on  many
bombardment missions over enemy occupied Continental Europe.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board  considered  Docket  Number  02-01099  in
Executive Session on 24 October 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
                       Mr. Frederick R. Beaman, III, Member
                       Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member

All members voted to correct the records,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit E.  Record of Proceedings, dated 5 Aug 02, w/atchs.
     Exhibit F.  Letter, Applicant, dated 25 Aug 02, w/atchs.




                                  RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                  Panel Chair

AFBCMR 02-01099




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 11 September 1944, he
was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, for meritorious achievement,
while serving as an Aerial Gunner and Aircraft Armorer on B-17 airplanes on
many bombardment missions over enemy occupied Continental Europe.










JOE G. LINEBERGER

Director

Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201099

    Original file (0201099.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55 and a Letter of Recommendation, dated 29 May 1944, indicating that he completed a total of 25 combat missions and was awarded the DFC and AM, 3 OLC. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that at the time he completed a total of 25 combat missions a member would be awarded a DFC and upon completion of every five combat...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2004-00787

    Original file (bc-2004-00787.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Under the revised policy, the DFC could be awarded for acts of heroism in combat flight or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel for applicant states, among other things, that the requested relief should be favorably considered based on the recommendation of the applicant’s former commanding officer and in view of the established...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2004-02294

    Original file (bc-2004-02294.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    During the period in question, he was told by a major at base headquarters that upon returning stateside, he would receive the DFC for his completion of a tour of 32 combat missions and an oak leaf cluster to the DFC for his completion of 14 lead missions. Under the revised policy, the DFC could be awarded for acts of heroism in combat flight or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. In view of this statement, and given the total number of missions the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-02470-2

    Original file (BC-2005-02470-2.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02470 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: DR. LEE ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross and an additional oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal. In support of the appeal, applicant submits a statement from the former 67th Bombardment Squadron Deputy...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01247

    Original file (BC-2006-01247.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01247 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXX (DECEASED) COUNSEL: DR ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 OCT 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to show he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and awarded the Air Medal (AM) with five Oak Leaf Clusters...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00386

    Original file (BC-2004-00386.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFPC/DPPPR states, in part, that although the applicant’s records indicate that he completed a total of 35 combat missions and he has submitted a DFC recommendation signed by his former commander, in 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM or DFC based solely on the number of combat missions completed, but rather for acts of heroism in combat flight or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. Applicant’s records do not indicate he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02730a

    Original file (BC-2002-02730a.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02730 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: TOM DRAKE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) and the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). In this respect, we note the Board previously denied his request for award of the DFC based on the absence of evidence that he completed a total...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02179

    Original file (BC-2005-02179.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02179 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and two additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). In addition, based on the Eighth Air Force policy...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02533A

    Original file (BC-2002-02533A.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E. In a letter, dated 26 February 2003, the applicant’s Congressman requests reconsideration of his application and provides additional documentation. Although a copy of the orders/citation to accompany award of the AM, 4 OLC, are unavailable, in his letter of 19 October 2000, the applicant states that he received this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03794

    Original file (BC-2004-03794.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In BC-2004-02294, the AFBCMR awarded a DFC to an applicant who had also completed more than the required ten missions as a lead navigator and an additional oak leaf cluster for completion of a tour of 32 combat missions. AFPC/DPPPR states, in part, that although the applicant’s records indicate that he completed a total of 35 combat missions and he has submitted a DFC recommendation signed by his former commander, in 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM...