RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01288
INDEX CODE 107.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Air Medal with 4th Oak Leaf Cluster (AM 4OLC) awarded for
accomplishments on 10 Oct 44 be upgraded to a Distinguished Flying
Cross (DFC).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The commanding officer of the 65th Bombardment Squadron (65 BS) made
the recommendation for the DFC on 23 Jun 45.
He provides copies of a 28 Feb 02 email from the former pilot
recommending the radio operator for the DFC and a 23 Jun 45
recommendation from the 65 BS commander for the DFC for the pilot. In
his email, the pilot claims the entire crew was assured they would be
recommended for the DFC and, 50 years later, he was finally awarded
the DFC. The former squadron flight surgeon provides an 8 Mar 01
statement asserting the crew was put in for the DFC but the award was
never processed. The former surgeon contends the pilot, the applicant
and the radio operator deserve the award. The applicant also provides
a narrative of his exploits entitled “My Lucky Dice.”
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s records were destroyed in the 1973 fire at the
National Personnel Records Center. The following information was
extracted from official documents provided by the applicant (Exhibits
A and C).
According to his Report of Separation, the applicant entered active
duty on (7-?) Feb 44. He was deployed to New Guinea on 22 May 44.
On 10 Oct 44,the applicant was the co-pilot of a B-24 aircraft taking
part in a mass formation daylight strike against the strongly defended
and strategically important Japanese oil refinery base at Balikpapen,
Borneo. The crew executed a perfect bombing run, during which a shell
struck the aircraft’s bomb bay and exploded in the fuselage, killing
the navigator and wounding three of the gunners. Although badly
damaged by machine gun and anti-aircraft fire, the B-24 returned and
landed successfully.
The applicant returned to the US on 11 Jun 45. On 29 Jun 45, applicant
was awarded the AM 4OLC for meritorious achievement while
participating in an aerial flight on 10 Oct 44. The applicant was
separated on 25 Aug 45 with 1 year, 6 months and 18 days of active
service.
On 4 Jun 02, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA invited the applicant to provide any
official documents pertinent to his AFBCMR appeal since his military
records had been destroyed by fire. The applicant’s additional
submission is at Exhibit C. Following their review, HQ AFPC/DPPRSP
administratively corrected the applicant’s Report of Separation to
reflect receipt of the following decorations: American Campaign medal,
Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with one Silver Star, World War II
Victory Medal. The applicant was provided a DD Form 215 on 18 Jul 02.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPPR notes that the applicant did not provide any
documentation showing he was recommended for award of the DFC. He
submitted documentation pertaining to [the pilot] of the same 10 Oct
44 combat mission flight. The [pilot], who also received the AM 4OLC
for the same incident, filed an appeal for the DFC and his case was
denied by the AFBCMR [on 7 May 02]. Since the applicant was awarded
the AM 4OLC for his accomplishments on 10 Oct 44, he cannot also be
awarded the DFC for those accomplishments.
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments provided by the
applicant, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 26 Jul 02 for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice to warrant upgrading the AM 4OLC
for the 10 Oct 44 mission to the requested DFC. We took notice of the
applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of his case. We
also acknowledge his decorated service and significant contributions
in defense of his country. However, no evidence has been presented to
our satisfaction showing that he was, or should have been, awarded the
DFC. Further, he received the AM 4OLC for his achievements on 10 Oct
44 and cannot be awarded another decoration for the same action.
Therefore, we agree with the recommendations of the Air Force and
adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden of having suffered either
an error or an injustice. In view of the above and absent persuasive
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 12 September 2002 under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
Mr. George Franklin, Member
The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
01288 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Mar 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Reconstructed Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 21 Jun 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Jun 02.
VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 01-02528 INDEX CODE 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He and his crew be awarded an unspecified decoration for destroying enemy jet fighters during a bombing mission from Italy to Berlin, Germany, on 24 Mar 45. On 12 Apr 96, a Congressional representative requested that the applicant and...
He stated that the DFC was awarded for completion of 35 combat flight missions. Therefore, the basis for the applicant’s claim that all other crew members of the 2 Oct 44 combat flight mission received the DFC is unsubstantiated. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant provided additional documentary evidence for the Board’s consideration through his...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02015
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request for award of the DFC and additional campaign credit for the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal be denied. DPPPR recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request for award of the DFC for actions on 10 October 1944; additional campaign credit for the Asiatic- Pacific Campaign Medal; and, award of the Air Medal with fourth oak leaf cluster for the period 23...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03110
A United States Army Air Forces Report of Aircraft Accident indicates that on 12 Aug 44, the applicant was the pilot of an aircraft that effected a normal takeoff. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial stating that there was no indication in the applicant’s records he was recommended for award of any decoration for the incident that occurred on 12 Aug 44. Notwithstanding this, no evidence has been presented...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03110
A United States Army Air Forces Report of Aircraft Accident indicates that on 12 Aug 44, the applicant was the pilot of an aircraft that effected a normal takeoff. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial stating that there was no indication in the applicant’s records he was recommended for award of any decoration for the incident that occurred on 12 Aug 44. Notwithstanding this, no evidence has been presented...
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's available military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and submitted previously received documentation to support his request for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02301
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02301 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 4 FEBRUARY 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) awards. It appears he was recommended for the DFC as...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01738
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01738 INDEX CODE: 107.00 (Member/Uncle) COUNSEL: None (Applicant/Nephew) 063-14-5768 HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 NOV 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncle be awarded the Silver Star (SS) [or some other fitting award - See Exhibit E] for heroic actions performed in World War II...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01326
By letter dated 6 Apr 92, the applicant requested the NPRC to award him the DFC based on the wounds he received on 15 Aug 44, which he contended was his 16th mission. The applicant seems to be requesting the DFC on the basis of both his 14th, or 16th, mission, wherein he states he released bombs from an open bomb bay, and the wounds he received later on what he believes was his 16th, or 22nd, mission on 15 Aug 44, and for which his Purple Heart was presumably awarded. Neither the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02176
The AFBCMR considered and denied the applicant’s previous request to have his DFC, 3OLC upgraded to the SS Medal for his action on 24 May 1969. He was told at the time, the 8th TFW would only submit a recommendation for one SS Medal and since the other pilot was the first to destroy 24 trucks, he would receive the higher award. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...