RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00613
INDEX CODE 110.00
COUNSEL: BURRELL D. JOHNSTON
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Although 42 years have passed, he still to this day regrets the fact
that he received a bad conduct discharge from the Air Force for
fighting when he was 18 years old. He blames no one but him self for
getting into fights when he was in England. Two summary courts
martial should have taught him a lesson. To be engaged in another
fistfight and go before a special court martial was reprehensible on
his part. His parents raised him better. He knew better and age was
not an excuse. After being discharged in 1959, except for a
conviction in 1961 for driving while intoxicated where he spent 10
hours in jail, he has not consumed any alcohol nor has he been
convicted of any criminal offense in the last 40 years. If the board
should be inclined to change the records to a general discharge, he
would be most grateful. As the records stand now, it is not the
proper legacy he wishes to leave his family.
In addition, the bad conduct discharge was removed as a category
during the 1960’s. The three events in attachments A, B. C. and D,
were actually the same and the special court martial was an
enhancement based on events 1 and 2 attachment A.
In support of his appeal, he submits a personal statement, a copy of
his court martial conviction, and letters from his attorney, the
Mississippi Commissioner of Insurance, Chairman-Arrow Trucks, Inc and
a good friend. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is
at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant's military personnel records were destroyed by fire in 1973.
Therefore, the facts surrounding his service cannot be verified.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is
attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF FBI REPORT:
The applicant reviewed the FBI Report and requested that his original
DD Form 149 be amended to read that he was arrested in 1961 for DUI.
Applicant's complete response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. We find no impropriety in the characterization of applicant's
discharge. It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate
standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive
evidence that pertinent regulations were violated or that applicant
was not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the time of
discharge. Considered alone, we conclude the discharge proceedings
were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to
the existing circumstances.
4. Consideration of this Board, however, is not limited to the
events which precipitated the discharge. We have a Congressional
mandate which permits consideration of other factors; e.g.,
applicant's background, the overall quality of service, and post-
service activities and accomplishments. Further, we may base our
decision on matters of equity and clemency rather than simply on
whether rules and regulations which existed at the time were followed.
This is a much broader consideration than officials involved in the
discharge were permitted, and our decision in no way discredits the
validity of theirs.
5. Under our broader mandate and after careful consideration of all
the facts and circumstances of applicant's case, we are persuaded that
applicant has been a productive member of society. We recognize the
adverse impact of the discharge applicant received; and, while it may
have been appropriate at the time, we believe it would be an injustice
for applicant to continue to suffer its effects. Accordingly, we find
that corrective action
is appropriate as a matter of equity and on the basis of clemency.
Therefore, we recommend his discharge be upgraded to one under
honorable conditions (General).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 10 November 1959,
he was discharged with service characterized as general (under
honorable conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 1 August 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. John L. Robuck, Panel Chair
Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Member
Mr. William H. Anderson, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Jan 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 2 Jul 02.
JOHN L. ROBUCK
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-00613
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that on 11 November
1959, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under
honorable conditions).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02318
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02318 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge, or in the alternative, a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00805 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The EO recommended that the applicant be discharge for unsuitability and given a general discharge. Exhibit B.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02031 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. The Board also invited the applicant provide additional evidence pertaining to his post-service activities. In a letter, dated 15 April 2002, the applicant states that he has no excuse for the way he acted...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02240
On 23 Jun 58, the Air Force Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for a discharge upgrade. Considered alone, we conclude the discharge proceedings were proper and the characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. Therefore, the Board Majority recommends the applicant’s discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions) as a matter of equity and on the basis of clemency.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00054 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. Further, we may base our decision on matters of equity and clemency rather than simply on whether rules and regulations which existed at the time were followed. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00054
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00054 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. Further, we may base our decision on matters of equity and clemency rather than simply on whether rules and regulations which existed at the time were followed. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01685
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Most of his 13 years of service were honorable; however, in his last year of service he developed a drinking problem. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that that on 23 December 1959, he was honorably discharged and furnished an...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00909
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00909 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to allow him to receive VA benefits. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01300 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to honorable. Considered alone, we conclude the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00771
In addition, based on his overall record of service, the events which precipitated the discharge, and the contents of the FBI report, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge is warranted on the basis of clemency. Exhibit B. Exhibit D. Air Force Regulation 39-17A.