Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101927
Original file (0101927.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  01-01927
            INDEX CODE 107.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His record be corrected to reflect  the  award  of  the  Armed  Forces
Expeditionary Medal.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He believed he should have been awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary
Medal as he participated in the American evacuation of  Saigon,  South
Vietnam.  He  supports  his  contention  by  submitting  a  letter  of
appreciation from the Chief of Security Police.

Applicant’s complete submission,  with  attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The Recognition Programs Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA, advised the applicant
on 31 Aug 01 that his DD Form 214 had been administratively  corrected
to reflect award of the Air Force Good Conduct  Medal  and  the  Small
Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted
from the applicant's military records, are  contained  in  the  letter
prepared by the appropriate office of  the  Air  Force.   Accordingly,
there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR recommended disapproval.  The applicant  has  not  provided
any documentation to substantiate his claim that  he  participated  in
Operation FREQUENT WIND on 29-30 Apr  75.   The  applicant  claims  he
volunteered on 29 Apr 75 for an unknown mission, immediately boarded a
C-130, flew several hours to reach Vietnam, and then flew back without
landing to Ubon RTAFB, which was closed, then on to  Udorn  RTAFB  the
next day.  He claims that the operation was of such short notice  that
no  TDY  orders  or  Travel  Vouchers  were  used.   The   Letter   of
Appreciation states that the applicant was TDY  from  Udorn  RTAFB  to
Ubon RTAFB (although it does not  state  the  inclusive  dates).   The
Letter of Appreciation merely states that the applicant was TDY within
Thailand; there is no mention of his having been to Vietnam  on  29-30
Apr 75.  By his own admission, the applicant states he did not land in
Vietnam; therefore, they can  not  verify  his  participation  in  the
evacuation operation.  Tan Son Nhut airfield was destroyed on   27 Apr
75, and  helicopters  accomplished  the  evacuation  of  Saigon.   The
applicant has not provided  any  documentation  showing  that  he  was
anywhere but in Thailand on 29-30 Apr 75.  Without  any  documentation
to substantiate  the  applicant’s  claim,  they  can  not  verify  his
eligibility for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for participation
in Operation FREQUENT WIND.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant reviewed the evaluations and provided  a  response  with
attachments, which is attached as Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice.  After a thorough review
of the available evidence  and  applicant’s  submission,  we  are  not
persuaded that he is entitled to the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.
 His  contentions  are  duly  noted;  however,  he  has  not  provided
persuasive evidence to warrant relief. We  therefore  agree  with  the
recommendations of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed  as
the basis for our decision that the applicant has  failed  to  sustain
his burden of having suffered either an error  or  an  injustice.   We
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the  relief  sought  in
this application.

_________________________________________________________________



THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of probable  material  error  or  injustice;
that the application was denied without  a  personal  appearance;  and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission  of
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence   not   considered   with   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 5 December 2001, under the provisions of AFI  36-
2603:

                 Mr. Benedict A. Kausal, IV, Panel Chair
                 Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
                 Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr., Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jun 01, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR dated 17 Aug 01.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 31 Aug 01.
      Exhibit E. Applicant's responses, dated 6 Aug and 4 Sep 01.



      BENEDICT A. KAUSAL, IV
      Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0001810

    Original file (0001810.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01810 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Report of Separation from Active Duty, DD Form 214, issued on 4 May 1976, be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart and that his foreign service was 1 year, 5 months and 14 days rather than 1 year and 20 days. DPAPP1...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02467

    Original file (BC-2012-02467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also, he knows other veterans who served in Thailand during the same time period and were not in-country; yet, they received both medals. Furthermore, his performance report for the inclusive period 1 Oct 74 to 30 Mar 75, reflects he was assigned to Udorn RTAFB, Thailand; however, this time-frame is outside of the closeout period for award of the VSM and RVCM. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0001810A

    Original file (0001810A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01810 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests additional credit for his foreign service and that he be awarded the following decorations: Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Combat “V” Device, the Vietnam Service and Campaign...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03780

    Original file (BC-2007-03780.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. In regards to the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM), we note that the Air Force office of primary responsibility has verified the applicant’s entitlement and has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04962

    Original file (BC 2013 04962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, personnel serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia in direct support of operations in Vietnam during the same time period were also eligible for the VSM. In accordance with Public Law 107-314, § 542, the AFEM, for participation in Operation FREQUENT WIND, may be exchanged for the Vietnam Service Medal. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01735

    Original file (BC-2007-01735.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01735 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 DEC 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect credit for service in Vietnam and that he be awarded the Humanitarian Service Medal (HSM), the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04991

    Original file (BC-2011-04991.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force primary office of responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial of award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and/or the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The AFEM is awarded for deployed service to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00108

    Original file (BC 2014 00108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00108 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: 1. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect this period of time deployed to Thailand, as well as award of the AFOUA, the VSM w/P and the RVNGC w/V. No action required by the Board, as the applicant’s official...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01399

    Original file (BC 2014 01399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01399 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the VSM indicating there is no evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200826

    Original file (0200826.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00826 INDEX CODE 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from the Armed Forces, be amended to reflect service in Vietnam. His final destination was Bien Hoa Air Base, Republic of Vietnam, another classified mission, where he provided...