Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0000739a
Original file (0000739a.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                                 ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  00-00739
            INDEX CODE:  129.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that  the  grade
of Sergeant be reinstated.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant was honorably discharged on 7 December 1945, in the  grade  of
private.  His WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report  of  Separation,
reflects his highest grade held as Sgt.  At the time of his  separation,  he
was credited with 3 years, 10 months and 22 days of active service for pay.

The applicant’s request  that  the  grade  of  sergeant  be  reinstated  was
considered and denied by the Board on 3 August 2000 (see Exhibit B).

Through his member of  Congress,  the  applicant  submitted  a  request  for
reconsideration and provided additional  documentation  in  the  form  of  a
Notice of Change of Address, two photos, a certificate of  military  service
for the period 19 Sep 40 thru 18 Sep 41, and a copy of his WD AGO  Form  53-
55, Honorable Discharge, effective 7 Dec 1945 (Exhibit C).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

The Board previously considered the applicant’s request and noted  that  his
military records were not available.  Therefore, based upon the  presumption
of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs, his request  that  the
grade  of  sergeant  be  reinstated  was  denied.   We  have  reviewed   the
additional evidence and it appears that at some point  in  time  during  the
applicant’s career in the Air Force he was a sergeant.   However,  the  same
documentation reflects that the applicant was discharged  in  the  grade  of
private.  Based on the foregoing, we again find  insufficient  evidence  has
been presented to show  that  the  applicant’s  rank  at  the  time  of  his
separation was in error.  However, should he submit additional  evidence  or
provide a detailed statement surrounding the reason  for  his  demotion,  we
would be willing to reconsider his request.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  00-00739
in Executive Session on 16 Sep 02, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Panel Chair
      Ms. Marcia J. Bachman, Member
      Mr. Roger E. Willmeth, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit B.  Record of Proceedings, dated 16 August 2000,
                with Exhibits.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, Congressman, dated 8 November 2000,
                w/letter from applicant.





                                   CHARLES E. BENNETT
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02228

    Original file (BC-2004-02228.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02228 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His WD AGO Form 53-55 - Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge, reflect award of the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. They researched the applicant’s personnel record and documents attached to the WD AGO 53-55; they...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100304

    Original file (0100304.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided a 9 Oct 45 War Department document indicating that he was awarded the PH for wounds received in action on 13 Jun 43 in the European Theater. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, advised that, since the applicant was a POW for approximately 23 months, he meets the prerequisites for a POW promotion and recommends he be promoted to MSgt effective 24 Sep 45, one day prior to his discharge...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2001-00304A

    Original file (BC-2001-00304A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 Sep 01, the Board granted the applicant’s requests for a POW promotion to MSgt and for his records to reflect he was a POW from 13 Jun 43 to 5 May 45; however, his request for the PH 1OLC was denied. While the B-17 was damaged by enemy fire, it was not “shot down,” did not “crash,” and the applicant sustained no wounds during the encounter until the aircraft made a rough landing in England and his arm jammed into the receiver. Novel, Panel Chair Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member Ms. Marcia...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0201851

    Original file (0201851.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01851 INDEX CODE: 130.00 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Prisoner of War (POW) medal for his time as prisoner of war during WWII. He was given POW status; however, he has not been given the medal. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01285

    Original file (BC-2003-01285.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In his rebuttal (Exhibit E), the applicant requests his WD AGO Form 100, Separation Qualification Record, reflect “13 May 45” rather than “2 May 45” in Item 13; his WD AGO Form 53-55, Report of Separation, be corrected to show in Item 7 a date of separation of 12 Oct 45, rather than 12 Nov 45, and in Item 34 that he received flack wounds in his left foot and thigh and frostbite in both feet; and the DD From 215, Correction to DD Form 214, amending his record to reflect receipt of the POW...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01473

    Original file (BC-2004-01473.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial. They indicated to award the PH, a member must provide documentation to support the wound received was a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. The applicant also believes he should receive award of the PH for an injury received to his right knee on a separate occasion after defusing a bomb.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01473

    Original file (BC-2004-01473.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial. They indicated to award the PH, a member must provide documentation to support the wound received was a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. The applicant also believes he should receive award of the PH for an injury received to his right knee on a separate occasion after defusing a bomb.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002915

    Original file (0002915.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Given the fact that this document was issued within a relatively short period of time following his separation, we must conclude that responsible officials had access to the applicant’s military records and determined that the applicant had been awarded the GCM. No documentary evidence has been presented to indicate that a recommendation for award of the DFC was officially submitted. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008367

    Original file (20100008367.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is insufficient evidence in the form of an official order, a recommendation for promotion or appointment, or other documentary evidence that shows he served in a higher grade. His reconstructed records show he held the rank of Pvt for a period of 4 months during basic training as well as during the remainder of his military service. The Board found that the additional supporting statement provided by the applicant was sufficient to show that he was, at the least, recommended for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010923

    Original file (20110010923.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the date of separation recorded on his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge). The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. [Applicant] was discharged 27 November 1945 with the 6 buddies, 27 November 1945."