RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00955
INDEX CODE: 110
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING: NO
The applicant requests that his general under honorable conditions
discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant's submission is at
Exhibit A.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’ request
on 12 May 1999. In accordance with policy, the application was
forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The
AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this
office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated
in the AFDRB Brief appear to be based on the evidence of record and
have not been rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence
applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations
were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find
no basis to disturb the existing record. Accordingly, applicant's
request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, and
Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy considered this application in accordance with
the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the governing
statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
DAVID W. MULGREW
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. AFDRB Brief
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding AFDRB Brief
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge on 27 Jun 97. The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The decision of the AFDRB appears to be based on the evidence of record and has not been rebutted by applicant.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request for upgrade of his general discharge on 7 Dec 00. The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit B). DAVID W. MULGREW Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 29 October 1997. The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. (Atch 1-3) Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is reasonably available as determined according to AFI 5 1-201.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 24 September 1999. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 21 January 1999 (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 3 Dec 99 (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. On 15 Jun 5 1, the discharge authority directed that applicant be discharged under the provisions of...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for upgrade of his discharge (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02800
Applicant's request to have his RE code changed was denied by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 8 Aug 75. After reviewing the evidence of record, we are unpersuaded that the applicant’s records are in error or that he has been the victim of an injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, AFDRB Hearing Record, dated 8 Aug 75.