RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 01-01017
INDEX CODE 115.04 131.01
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The flying status section of the Officer Selection Brief (OSB)
reviewed by the Calendar Year 2000A (CY00A) Lieutenant Colonel Central
Selection Board be corrected to reflect “CONDL HDIP NON RATED-ACT
AIRCREW MEMBER,” and she be considered by a Special Selection Board
(SSB).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on extended active duty in the
grade of major (date of rank: 1 Mar 97).
The flying status section of the applicant’s 21 Aug 00 Officer Pre-
selection Brief (OPB) for the CY00A board reflected “CONDL HDIP NON
RATED-ACT AIRCREW MEMBER” (Conditional Hazardous Duty Incentive Pay,
Non-rated, Active Aircrew Member). Paragraph 12 of the Instruction
Sheet accompanying HQ AFPC/DPP’s 5 Jul 00 CY00A board notification
letter indicates that flying hours will be reflected on the OSB for
rated officers, but not for non-rated aircrew members. A copy of the
letter and Instruction Sheet is provided at Exhibit C.
The applicant was considered but not selected for promotion by the
CY00A board, which convened on 28 Nov 00. The flying section on the
OSB was blank.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Officer Promotion & Appointment Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPOO,
reviewed the appeal and provided her rationale for recommending
denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation, as well as the CY00A Instruction
Sheet, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 15 Jun 01 for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The applicant was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After a thorough review
of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not
persuaded that the flying status on the CY00A OSB should be amended
and she be afforded SSB consideration by that board. Applicant’s
contentions are duly noted; however, we do not find these
uncorroborated assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently
persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air Force. We
therefore adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision
that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of having suffered
either an error or an injustice. In view of the above and absent
persuasive evidence to the contrary, we conclude this appeal should be
denied.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 18 Jul 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel Chair
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Member
Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Mar 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPOO, dated 25 May 01.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 15 Jun 01.
DAVID C. VAN GASBECK
Panel Chair
In addition, it also covers instances where degrees may have been displaced or dropped from an OSB and advises officers to contact AFIT to obtain a letter detailing academic history/credentials, which can be used as an attachment to a letter to the board president. Upon reviewing his OPB, he contacted AFIT many times to explore the possibility of adding a third entry to the Academic Education selection to reflect his Master’s Degree in computer science, substituting the Master’s Degree in...
Although the certificate was not in the applicant’s records, the board members saw the documentation (OSB, dated 15 Nov 00), reflecting that she was board certified (Exhibit C). The Officer Promotion and Appointment Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPOO, stated that eligible officers are provided an officer preselection brief (OPB) approximately 100 days prior to board convening date along with an instruction sheet that outlines how to correct discrepancies prior to the start of a promotion board. While...
The brief contains information that will be on the OSB at the central board. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 16 August 2002, for review and response within 30 days. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we are not sufficiently persuaded that the applicant should be...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00931 INDEX CODE: 111.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Officer Selection Record (OSR) for the CY00A Colonel Medical Corps (MC) Central Selection Board be corrected to include her certificate of board certification and documentation to show her qualification as a flight surgeon. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02040
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends he did not receive his OSB in time to review it prior to the promotion board. A complete copy of applicant’s response, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPE asserts the applicant has not provided any...
His Officer Selection Record (OSR) and Officer Selection Brief (OSB) for the Calendar Year 2000A (CY00A) (6 Nov 00) Colonel Dental Corps (DC) Central Selection Board be corrected to include his certificate of board certification (which has since been corrected), previous Army duty history, Professional Military Education (PME) (which has since been corrected) and decorations. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPPOO also reviewed...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02671
The applicant’s PME Officer Selection Brief (OSB) did not reflect award of the MSM but a copy of the citation was filed in the Officer Selection Record (OSR) on 21 August 2001. They indicated that the applicant’s PME Officer Selection Brief (OSB) did not reflect award of the MSM but a copy of the citation was filed in the Officer Selection Record (OSR) on 21 August 2001. The evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01858
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01858 INDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Academic Education section in the Officer Selection Brief (OSB) for the Calendar Year 2001A (CY01A) central colonel selection board be updated to reflect completion of the Advanced Education in General Dentistry II (AEGDII)...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02152
He also requests promotion consideration by a Special Selection Board (SSB) by the CY00 board. He was advised by personnel since his duty title on his Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) was correct, the board would have the correct information. Also, since the applicant was aware of the error and knew the information had not been corrected, he could have written a letter to the board informing them of his missing duty title.
The instructions also state, “Officers will not be considered by a Special Selection Board if, in exercising reasonable diligence, the officer should have discovered the error or omission in his/her records and could have taken timely corrective action.” The applicant has not demonstrated he exercised “reasonable diligence” in getting the erroneous information corrected as is evidenced by a Report on Individual Person (RIP) he submitted that was dated 8 Jul 98. A copy of the Air Force...