RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 00-03152
INDEX CODE: 131.09
XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
Applicant requests his retired rank be changed from lieutenant colonel
to colonel.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application
be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, this
office has received no response.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record
and have not been rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence
applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations
were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find
no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Mr. Joseph A. Roj and
Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy considered this application on 8 March 2001 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and
the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant and counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). Counsel's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2009-03125
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS A complete copy of the NGB/A1POE evaluation is at Exhibit C. The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01701
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The Commander, Air Force Reserve Command concurred and forwarded the request to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) on 22 Jun 10. The applicant’s initial request for an extension of her MSD was received and processed in a timely manner.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 25 Oct 99 (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant’s counsel and the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02531
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03193
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS His current reenlistment date of 29 Jul 08 be changed to a later date so that he may be paid a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-03193 in Executive Session on 13 Apr 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2009-04305
His 27 Oct 09 Letter of Reprimand (LOR) be removed from his Unfavorable Information File (UIF) and Officer Selection Record (OSR) and any and all adverse information be removed from his records. On 10 Nov 09, the applicant’s squadron commander notified him of his intent to file the LOR in his officer selection record (OSR) and of his right to appeal the decision. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's complete submission, we do not find his assertions and the...