RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02770
INDEX CODE: 137.04
(DECEASED) COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election be changed from spouse only
coverage to spouse and children coverage, based on full retired pay.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her husband elected reduced benefits because he thought he would recover
from his terminal illness and because the cost of maximum survivor
benefits was too expensive. Once he signed up, there was no going back.
She felt forced to sign the retirement papers because she would be
denying her husband the hope and strength to carry on as long as he
could.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
deceased military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the
appropriate office of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Retiree Services Branch, AFPC/DPPTR, reviewed this application
and recommended partial relief because, although the SBP form revealed
the decedent’s clear intent to elect spouse only coverage, the level of
coverage was uncertain. The member initialed the block, “coverage based
on full retired pay without supplemental SBP,” but the counselor inserted
a reduced base amount of $1800. The administrative error invalidated the
election and DFAS should have established full spouse coverage to comply
with the law. Therefore, they recommended that the record be corrected
to show that on 2 February 1996, the member elected spouse only coverage
based on full retired pay. Approval should be contingent on recoupment
of all applicable premiums the member would have paid had he made the
election at that time.
A member who elects less than maximum SBP spouse coverage may not
increase the base amount in the future unless Congress authorizes an open
enrollment period. A member who has eligible children and fails to
provide coverage for those children is barred from providing future
coverage for those children or other children except during an open
enrollment period. The spouse of a retiring member must provide written
concurrence in an election for less than maximum spouse coverage. In the
event a member is determined to be incompetent for pay and records, that
SBP decision is made by the Secretary of the Air Force at the request of
the member’s immediate next of kin. Children are contingent
beneficiaries in spouse and child elections, receiving payment only in
the event the surviving spouse dies or remarries before age 55.
The applicant and the decedent were married on 28 May 1977. He elected,
and the applicant concurred in the election for spouse only SBP coverage
based on a reduced level of retired pay, prior to his 3 February 1996
disability retirement. He died on 14 September 1996. The applicant is
currently receiving an SBP annuity of $192, after the $881 offset, based
on her entitlement to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) awarded
to her by the Veterans Administration (VA). If the election had been
based on full retired pay, the applicant’s SBP would be $1,172 ($2,053
minus the $881 offset).
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22
December 2000, for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). She
stated that she was pleased with the recommendation for partial relief,
and posed questions regarding her children’s eligibility for benefits,
recoupment of premiums, and the errors made during her husband’s
retirement processing. Her complete response, with attachments, is at
Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error warranting partial relief, since an
administrative error on the SBP election form concerning the level of
coverage should have invalidated the election. As such, DFAS-CL should
have established full spouse coverage to comply with the law. Therefore,
we accept the opinion and recommendation from the Chief, Retiree Services
Branch, and recommend that the records of the deceased member be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
4. While we determined that the applicant is entitled to an SBP annuity
due to an administrative error, insufficient relevant evidence has been
presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice
with respect to the applicant’s request that the records be corrected to
allow for coverage for the children of the deceased member. We noted the
additional questions raised by the applicant in her rebuttal and offer
the following for amplification. At the time of his disability
retirement, the deceased member was considered competent for pay and
records, but he failed to elect coverage for his eligible children.
Therefore, he was barred from ever providing coverage for those children
except during an open enrollment period. There was no open enrollment
period after his retirement in February 1996, or before his death in
September 1996. Moreover, children are contingent beneficiaries,
receiving benefits only in the event the surviving spouse dies or
remarries before age 55. Therefore, the request for coverage for the
children of the deceased member is not favorably considered.
5. With respect to the question concerning the recoupment of premiums
for spouse only coverage based on full retired pay, the Chief, Retiree
Services Branch, AFPC/DPPTR, states that all applicable premiums from the
time of the deceased member’s retirement in February 1996, until his
death in September 1996, will be recouped. According to AFPC/DPPTR, the
applicant will continue to receive the reduced benefit until all premiums
have been paid. Since the amount of the increased premiums totals
approximately $700 ($100 x 7 months), the applicant should start
receiving the full annuity for spouse only coverage based on full retired
pay after approximately one month.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 2 February 1996, he
elected spouse only coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), based
on full retired pay.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 16 May 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Member
Mr. Mike Novel, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Oct 2000, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPTR, dated 7 Dec 2000, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 22 Dec 2000.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 11 Jan 2001, w/atchs.
DAVID C. VAN GASBECK
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 00-02770
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to (DECEASED), , be corrected to show that on 2 February 1996,
he elected spouse only coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP),
based on full retired pay.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01375
DPPTR adds that should the applicant provide the pertinent documentation, it would be appropriate to change the record to reflect on the day following the date of divorce, he elected to change his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage based on previous reduced level of retired pay and contingent on recoupment of applicable premiums. DPPTR’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A...
He could have elected former spouse SBP coverage for her during the 1992 open enrollment. However, spouse premiums could be terminated following divorce if the member additionally selected Option 4. He could have elected former spouse SBP coverage for her during the 92 open enrollment.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03764
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR recommend that applicant’s request be denied and stated that there is no evidence of Air Force error or injustice, or merit in fact, nor basis in law to approve this case. Briefing material used at the time the member completed his RSFPP election clearly stated that “dependents acquired after you retire are not eligible to receive Family Protection Plan annuity payments,” payments would only...
An AFAFC letter to the decedent, dated 7 October 1972, explained that SBP coverage had been established on his spouse's behalf in compliance with the provision of the law that required establishment of maximum spouse and child coverage if a member, such as the applicant, made no election before retirement. Documents provided by the applicant include a copy of a 7 Oct 72 letter to the decedent from the Air Force Accounting and Finance Center (AFAFC) which explained SBP coverage had been...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03119
Thus, she is requesting reconsideration of the recommendation in part and she proposes the following: (1) her deceased husband’s records be corrected to show that he elected spouse and child SBP coverage on 31 January 1981, (2) the total accrued benefits (from 22 October 2001 until a final decision by the Board) shall be accepted as payment in full towards the amount that would have been deducted had her deceased husband elected to contribute to the SBP Plan on 31 January 1981, and (3)...
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 21 October 1992, he went to the AFB Personnel Center to check on the SBP status of hi insure that she was enrolled, and also to enroll two newly adopted small children (of his deceased son) during the SBP Open Enrollment Election period. Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. At the time, he did not receive any paperwork pertaining to the fact that his wife or his children were enrolled.
The evidence also establishes the deceased member’s efforts to provide the applicant with all the benefits she was entitled to as the spouse of a retired service member. Microfiche records verify SBP enrollment packets and newsletters were mailed to the address the decedent provided to the finance center during the 1981-1982 and 1992-1993 open enrollment periods. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
The member and his current spouse married on 17 February 1996, but he failed to advise the finance center that he did not want to extend SBP coverage to his new wife before the first anniversary of their marriage (17 February 1997). A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 March...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03271
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03271 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former husband's records be corrected to show he filed a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and any SBP premium payments due be waived. ...
There were no provisions in the law at that time to notify spouses if the servicemember did not elect coverage. There is no evidence that the servicemember elected SBP during any of the authorized open enrollments. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Apr 02.