Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002298
Original file (0002298.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  00-02298
            INDEX NUMBER:  110.02


            COUNSEL:  NONE


            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The two court-martials he received  were  for  being  Absent  Without  Leave
(AWOL).  The applicant states that he was young and probably  acted  without
thinking; however, the civil court conviction was for a crime  that  he  did
not commit, nor was he a participant.  He found out about it the  very  next
day  when  he  was  confronted  by  the  local  authorities  at  the   base.
Additionally, he says that the Air  Force  legal  counsel  did  not  try  to
defend him, or plead his innocence, and his recommendation was the cause  of
him getting sentenced to one (1) year of hard labor.

In support of his appeal, the  applicant  submitted  a  personal  statement,
letters of recommendation from the  local  mayor,  a  friend  and  a  former
employment director, and a copy of his DD Form  214,  Report  of  Separation
from the Armed Forces of the United States.

Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 24 October 1950, applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.   Prior  to
the events under review he was promoted to the grade of airman  third  class
(A/3C).  Applicant’s grade at time of discharge was airman basic (AB).

On or about 15 May 1953, applicant was convicted by a summary  court-martial
for making a false official statement.  He  was  reduced  to  the  grade  of
Basic Airman and sentenced to confinement at hard labor (CHL)  for  30  days
and forfeiture of $45.00.

On or about 27 July 1953,  applicant  was  convicted  by  a  summary  court-
martial for being AWOL on or about 3 July 1953  to       18 July  1953.   He
was sentenced to CHL for 30 days and forfeiture of $30.00.

On 30 October 1953, the applicant was convicted of assault  with  intent  to
rob by the Dougherty Superior Court, Dougherty County, GA, and sentenced  to
12 months imprisonment.

On 28 November 1953, he was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-22  by
reason of conviction by civil court, with an undesirable discharge.  He  was
credited with 2 years, 8 months, and 28 days active  service  (excludes  152
days of lost time).

Pursuant to the  Board’s  request,  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation,
Clarksburg,  West  Virginia,  provided  an  investigative  report  which  is
attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application  and  states
the applicant was court-martialed because he pled guilty in  a  civil  court
and was sentenced to one-year civil confinement for assault with  intent  to
rob.  They  also  state  the  discharge  authority  reviewed  the  case  and
approved the recommendation for discharge and directed that he be  given  an
undesirable discharge.  The discharge was  consistent  with  the  procedural
and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation at the time of  his
discharge.

They further state the applicant’s character of service given  in  his  case
was appropriate according to the discharge regulations,  and  the  applicant
did not submit any new  evidence,  identify  any  errors  in  the  discharge
process, nor provide any facts  to  warrant  an  upgrade  of  the  discharge
characterization.  Accordingly, they recommend that the applicant’s  records
remain unchanged and his request be denied.

A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant responded to the FBI report by  letter,  undated,  to  further
explain the events which led to his entry into the service, items listed  on
his report  and  accomplishments  since  his  discharge  from  active  duty.
Additionally, he submitted letters from his son and a friend (Exhibit G).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  We have reviewed the circumstances  surrounding  applicant’s  separation
from the Air Force and believe that the action taken was in accordance  with
the applicable regulation.  Therefore, the only other basis  upon  which  to
consider his request for an upgrade of  his  discharge  would  be  based  on
clemency.  After reviewing the documentation submitted by the applicant  and
noting his explanation concerning certain charges  on  his  FBI  report,  we
believe that his discharge should be upgraded to  general,  under  honorable
conditions.   His  request  for  an  honorable  discharge  was   considered;
however, based on his overall record of service, we do not  believe  that  a
further upgrade is warranted.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 28  Nov  1953  he  was  discharged
with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions).

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 13 February 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
                       Ms. Carolyn J. Watkins, Member
                       Mr. E. David Hoard, Member

All members voted to correct the records,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 21 Aug 00, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  FBI Report of Investigation
     Exhibit D.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 5 Sep 00.
     Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 22 Sep 00.
     Exhibit F.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 20 Dec 00.
     Exhibit G.  Applicant’s Response, w/atchs.




                                  THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                  Vice Chair


AFBCMR 00-02298




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 28 Nov 1953 he was
discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable
conditions).





JOE G. LINEBERGER


Director



Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101015

    Original file (0101015.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 13 Nov 52, applicant was convicted by Summary Court-Martial for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 30 Oct 52 until on or about 12 Nov 52. The Board recommended discharge from the service because of unfitness, with an undesirable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 9 Dec 1953, he was discharged with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0000637

    Original file (0000637.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s grade at the time of discharge was airman basic (A/B). Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states the applicant was court-martialed for being AWOL and was sentenced to 3 months at hard labor and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03022

    Original file (BC-2005-03022.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 Apr 62, the squadron commander notified the applicant that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force for a civil court conviction. Applicant was discharged on 26 Apr 62, in the grade of airman basic (E-1), under the provisions of AFM 39-22, with separation designation number 284 (Involuntarily discharged for misconduct, civil court disposition, processed by waiver of entitlement to a board hearing), and was issued an under other than honorable conditions (undesirable)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00723

    Original file (BC-2005-00723.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00723 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 SEP 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. They found the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0001022

    Original file (0001022.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board recommended discharge from the service because of unfitness, with an undesirable discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 15 Feb 01, the Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states that the applicant did not provide evidence of errors...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02044

    Original file (BC-2007-02044.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was only 17 when he entered the military, and he was not convicted in any military court. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 17 December 1953, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01255

    Original file (BC-2004-01255.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 3 February 1951, the former member enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age of 18 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of four (4) years. On 12 December 1955, the former member submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFRDB) requesting his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102805

    Original file (0102805.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a letter of character reference from his pastor and deacon board; a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States and his Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Hearing record. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. He also states that when he was discharged, he was told that in six months his discharge would be upgraded.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01465

    Original file (BC-2004-01465.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01465 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 29 October 1953, the discharge authority approved the separation recommended by the Board of Officers and directed that applicant be discharged with an undesirable discharge. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02764

    Original file (BC-2004-02764.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02764 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. He was credited with 3 years, 7 months, and 4 days active service (excludes 197 days of lost time due to three periods of confinement). They also noted applicant did not...