RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02298
INDEX NUMBER: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The two court-martials he received were for being Absent Without Leave
(AWOL). The applicant states that he was young and probably acted without
thinking; however, the civil court conviction was for a crime that he did
not commit, nor was he a participant. He found out about it the very next
day when he was confronted by the local authorities at the base.
Additionally, he says that the Air Force legal counsel did not try to
defend him, or plead his innocence, and his recommendation was the cause of
him getting sentenced to one (1) year of hard labor.
In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a personal statement,
letters of recommendation from the local mayor, a friend and a former
employment director, and a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Separation
from the Armed Forces of the United States.
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 24 October 1950, applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. Prior to
the events under review he was promoted to the grade of airman third class
(A/3C). Applicant’s grade at time of discharge was airman basic (AB).
On or about 15 May 1953, applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial
for making a false official statement. He was reduced to the grade of
Basic Airman and sentenced to confinement at hard labor (CHL) for 30 days
and forfeiture of $45.00.
On or about 27 July 1953, applicant was convicted by a summary court-
martial for being AWOL on or about 3 July 1953 to 18 July 1953. He
was sentenced to CHL for 30 days and forfeiture of $30.00.
On 30 October 1953, the applicant was convicted of assault with intent to
rob by the Dougherty Superior Court, Dougherty County, GA, and sentenced to
12 months imprisonment.
On 28 November 1953, he was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-22 by
reason of conviction by civil court, with an undesirable discharge. He was
credited with 2 years, 8 months, and 28 days active service (excludes 152
days of lost time).
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is
attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states
the applicant was court-martialed because he pled guilty in a civil court
and was sentenced to one-year civil confinement for assault with intent to
rob. They also state the discharge authority reviewed the case and
approved the recommendation for discharge and directed that he be given an
undesirable discharge. The discharge was consistent with the procedural
and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation at the time of his
discharge.
They further state the applicant’s character of service given in his case
was appropriate according to the discharge regulations, and the applicant
did not submit any new evidence, identify any errors in the discharge
process, nor provide any facts to warrant an upgrade of the discharge
characterization. Accordingly, they recommend that the applicant’s records
remain unchanged and his request be denied.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responded to the FBI report by letter, undated, to further
explain the events which led to his entry into the service, items listed on
his report and accomplishments since his discharge from active duty.
Additionally, he submitted letters from his son and a friend (Exhibit G).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. We have reviewed the circumstances surrounding applicant’s separation
from the Air Force and believe that the action taken was in accordance with
the applicable regulation. Therefore, the only other basis upon which to
consider his request for an upgrade of his discharge would be based on
clemency. After reviewing the documentation submitted by the applicant and
noting his explanation concerning certain charges on his FBI report, we
believe that his discharge should be upgraded to general, under honorable
conditions. His request for an honorable discharge was considered;
however, based on his overall record of service, we do not believe that a
further upgrade is warranted.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 28 Nov 1953 he was discharged
with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 13 February 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
Ms. Carolyn J. Watkins, Member
Mr. E. David Hoard, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Aug 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report of Investigation
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 5 Sep 00.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 22 Sep 00.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 20 Dec 00.
Exhibit G. Applicant’s Response, w/atchs.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Vice Chair
AFBCMR 00-02298
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 28 Nov 1953 he was
discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable
conditions).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
On 13 Nov 52, applicant was convicted by Summary Court-Martial for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 30 Oct 52 until on or about 12 Nov 52. The Board recommended discharge from the service because of unfitness, with an undesirable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 9 Dec 1953, he was discharged with...
Applicant’s grade at the time of discharge was airman basic (A/B). Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states the applicant was court-martialed for being AWOL and was sentenced to 3 months at hard labor and...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03022
On 16 Apr 62, the squadron commander notified the applicant that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force for a civil court conviction. Applicant was discharged on 26 Apr 62, in the grade of airman basic (E-1), under the provisions of AFM 39-22, with separation designation number 284 (Involuntarily discharged for misconduct, civil court disposition, processed by waiver of entitlement to a board hearing), and was issued an under other than honorable conditions (undesirable)...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00723
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00723 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 SEP 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. They found the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Exhibit B.
The Board recommended discharge from the service because of unfitness, with an undesirable discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 15 Feb 01, the Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states that the applicant did not provide evidence of errors...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02044
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was only 17 when he entered the military, and he was not convicted in any military court. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 17 December 1953, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01255
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 3 February 1951, the former member enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age of 18 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of four (4) years. On 12 December 1955, the former member submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFRDB) requesting his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ The...
In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a letter of character reference from his pastor and deacon board; a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States and his Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Hearing record. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. He also states that when he was discharged, he was told that in six months his discharge would be upgraded.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01465
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01465 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 29 October 1953, the discharge authority approved the separation recommended by the Board of Officers and directed that applicant be discharged with an undesirable discharge. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02764
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02764 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. He was credited with 3 years, 7 months, and 4 days active service (excludes 197 days of lost time due to three periods of confinement). They also noted applicant did not...