RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00583
INDEX CODE: 110.00
XXXXX COUNSEL: XXXXXX
XXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes
Applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge be changed to general
(under honorable conditions). Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided
an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied
(Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant's counsel
for review and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to
warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory
opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been
rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the
existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issue(s) involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only
be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was
not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
Members of the Board XXXXXX considered this application on 3 February 2000
in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the
governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
XXXXXXX
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed. He has not filed a timely request Place of enlistment (FOE) is defined as the place where a member was initially...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2012-01966
DPAPP states that a review of the applicant’s Master Personnel Records and the documentation submitted does not substantiate his claim that he served in Vietnam. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jul 12. In support of the applicant’s request that his records be corrected to reflect his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), he has provided the original temporary duty (TDY) orders assigning him from Clark Air Base, the Philippines, to Hue Phu Bai, RVN for two days in February 1968 and...
CG | BCMR | OER and or Failure of Selection | 1998-067
This final decision, dated December 17, 1998, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST FOR RELIEF The applicant, a xxxxxx in the Coast Guard, asked the Board to correct his record by removing a special officer evaluation report (disputed OER) received while serving as the xxxxxxxxx at the xxxxxxxx.1 The applicant also requested that the Board remove from his record any other documents referring to his removal as xxxxxxxxx. “The xxxx” was the xxx of the Xxxxxxxxx of the Xxxxxx. ...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant’s counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant and counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). Counsel’s response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01383 XXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No Applicant requests his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, Block 1, Name, be changed to read ; and Block 15a, Member Contributed to post- era Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program, be amended by placing an X in the “Yes” block. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and...