RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 99-00129
INDEX CODE: 126.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his nonjudicial punishments, imposed on 24 Nov
and 11 Dec 98, be set aside. Applicant's submissions are at Exhibit
A.
With regard to the applicant’s forfeiture of pay being returned, we
note that this portion of his request will be corrected
administratively by the Defense Finance and Accounting System (DFAS-
DE/FYCC) (Exhibit C). Hence, no action is required by this Board.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
concerning the nonjudicial punishments and provided an advisory
opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit
D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review
and response (Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request concerning the
nonjudicial punishments and the available evidence of record, we find
insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective
action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear
to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by
applicant. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to
which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb
the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Mr. John E. Pettit, and Mr.
Patrick R. Wheeler considered this application on 29 June 2000 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and
the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
WAYNE R. GRACIE
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Forms 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Ltr, DFAS-DE/FYCC, dtd 9 Jun 00
D. Advisory Opinion
E. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Applicant is stating t h a t he s o l d 20 days of leave back to the United States Air Force upon separation August 16, 1997, but was never paid for the leave nor...
On 31 July 1996, she was honorably released from active duty, under the provisions - miscellaneous/general reasons), and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. ( voluntary release 36-3208 of AFI The Commander's Programs Branch, AFPC/DPSFC, stated applicant's master military pay account (MMPA) shows 20 days of excess leave since applicant's days of leave exceeded the days accrued as of the date of release from active duty on 31 July 1996. In this regard, the commander's erroneous permissive...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE DENVER CENTER 6760 E. IWINGTON PLACE DENVER, COLORADO 80279 DFAS-DE/FYCC MEMORANDUM FOR AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS ATTN: AFBCMR SUBJECT: Application for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00386
The Board determined that the military records should be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff United States Air Force. The office responsible for making the correction will inform you when your records have been changed. Copy of Directive cc: DFAS-DE AFBCMR BC-2007-00386 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with...
Applicant's The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE DENVER CENTER 6760 E. IRVINGTON PLACE DENVER, COLORADO 80279 DFAS- DE / FYCC MEMORANDUM FOR AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS ATTN: AFBCMR SUBJECT: Application for...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions LeROY T. BASEMAN Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS DEC 0 4 I997 U.S. AIR FORCE B 1 9 4 7 - 1 9 9 7 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPRS 550 C Street West...
AFBCMR 01-01021 INDEX CODE: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00365
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00365 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 AUGUST 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. The regulation in effect at that time required that a member be issued an undesirable discharge. Copy of Directive cc:...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant/counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). Counsel provided additional documentation which is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.