RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02056
INDEX NUMBER: 112.05
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to 1A.
(Examiner’s Note: RE code 2C denotes involuntarily separated with an
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without
characterization of service.)
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate offices of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no
need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Military Personnel Management Specialist, HQ AFPC/DPPRS reviewed
this application and recommended denial. A complete copy of the
evaluation is at Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPPAES reviewed the case file and indicated the assigned RE
code is correct (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
29 September 2000 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. At the time a member is
separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE Code predicated
upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their
separation. The assigned code reflects the Air Force’s position
regarding whether or not, or under what circumstances, the individual
should be allowed to reenlist. The evidence of record supports the
stated reasons for applicant’s entry-level separation; i.e., his
failure to make satisfactory progress in a required training program.
After careful consideration of the evidence provided, a majority of
the Board was not persuaded that the assigned RE code is in error or
unjust or that an upgrade of the RE code is warranted on the basis of
clemency at this time. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, a majority of the Board finds no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
A majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence of error or
injustice and recommend the application be denied.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 16 November 2000, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel Chair
Ms. Melinda Loftin, Member
Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson, Member
By a majority vote, the Board voted to deny the request. Ms. White-
Olson voted to correct the record and did not desire to submit a
minority report. The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Aug 00, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 25 Aug 00.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAES, dated 8 Sep 00.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 29 Sep 00.
PEGGY E. GORDON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 00-00722
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR
CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS(AFBCMR)
SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of
I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the
recommendation of the Board members. A majority found that
applicant had not provided substantial evidence of error or
injustice and recommended the case be denied. I concur with that
finding and their conclusion that relief is not warranted.
Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that the application be
denied.
Please advise the applicant accordingly.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards
Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01490
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01490 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for discharge and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow eligibility to enlist in the Air National Guard. The applicant’s request for a conditional waiver of an administrative discharge board...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01490 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for discharge and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow eligibility to enlist in the Air National Guard. The applicant’s request for a conditional waiver of an administrative discharge board...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00798 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Applicant requests the reenlistment eligibility code (RE) 2C be changed to allow him to continue his military career. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Special Programs and AFBCMR Manager, AFPC/DPPAES, reviewed...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS stated that the applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in discharge processing. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
In his 13 years of service, he never received an Article 15 or any such reprimands. The application was timely filed. Exhibit C. AFDRB Hearing Record, dated 3 Apr 01, w/atch.
His one Airman Performance Report (APR) for the period closing 29 Sep 72 has an overall rating of 6. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded his general discharge should be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 17 December 2002 under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03022 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be upgraded to a code in the three (3) series to allow...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03481
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03481 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Narrative Reason for Separation be changed from Mental Disorder to Medical. The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) reflects Mental Disorder as the narrative reason for separation. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02892 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reason for separation and the reenlistment code (RE) be changed on the DD Form 214 to allow her to return to military service. The medical consultant recommends that the applicant’s reason for separation be changed to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00438
The following information was obtained from the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Hearing Record. On 17 Nov 00, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for a change to the reason and authority for the discharge. After careful review of the available records and the information contained in the Air Force Discharge Review Board Hearing Record, the applicant’s discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing Air Force...