RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01216
INDEX CODE: A93.95
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to
honorable, and that she be retired.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Military Justice Division, AFLSA/JAJM, reviewed this application
and recommended denial. A complete copy of the evaluation is at
Exhibit C.
The Retirements Branch, AFPC/DPPRR, reviewed this application and
recommended denial. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit
D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reviewed the advisory opinions and provided supporting
documentation for the Board’s consideration, which is attached at
Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air
Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 9 Nov 00, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. George Franklin, Member
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Apr 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFLSA/JAJM, dated 28 Jul 00.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRR, dated 31 Aug 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 22 Sep 00.
Exhibit F. Supporting documents from applicant.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
On 4 August 1998, the vacation of the suspended reduction was set aside, and she was returned to the grade of A1C with a date of rank and effective date of 30 December 1997. Therefore, we agree with opinions and recommendations of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records (Exhibit B), are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force (Exhibits C, D, E and F). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, a majority of the Board concludes that no relief is warranted. As he had no unfitting condition, the majority of the Board agrees with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant that consideration...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01374
He also claims that he is entitled to promotion because his current service for basic pay exceeds the high year tenure (HYT) for the grade of staff sergeant. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The applicant’s counsel reviewed the Air Force evaluations and indicated that at this time his client chooses not to respond to the advisory opinions. After...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01666 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 126.03, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Any mention of a Letter of Admonishment (LOA) for an alleged unprofessional relationship be removed from her records, including her officer performance report (OPR) closing 5 May 99. In JA’s view, relief should be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01423
A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPPR states that the applicant is not eligible for award of the Air Force Good Conduct (AFGC) Medal. Since he received his first Article 15 during this assignment, he would not be eligible for a decoration upon completion of his overseas tour. After reviewing the evidence of record, we are not persuaded that the applicant’s records are in error or that he has been the victim of an injustice.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01188 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Retirements Branch, AFPC/DPPRR, reviewed this application and states that there are no provisions of law to allow Regular captains who have been nonselected for promotion to the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-01188
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01188 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Retirements Branch, AFPC/DPPRR, reviewed this application and states that there are no provisions of law to allow Regular captains who have been nonselected for promotion to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01530
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Jul 04 for review and comment within 30 days. Exhibit C. Letter, AFLSA/JAJM, dated 12 Jul 04. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Jul 04.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02541 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1960 Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable or, in the alternative, his first (honorable) enlistment be separated from his second enlistment so he can receive medical benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...