RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER:
00-00567
COUNSEL:
NONE
HEARING DESIRED:
NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions upgraded to general or honorable.
(UOTHC
discharge be
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and
the evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the Air Force Discharge
Review Board AFDRB brief. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these
facts in this Record of Proceedings.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The AFDRB considered and denied the applicant's request on 12 Jul 00 and
provided rationale in the examiner's brief.
A complete copy of the AFDRB brief is attached at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for
review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
[pic]
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2
The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. After careful consideration of
applicant's request and the available evidence of record, a majority of the
Board finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant
corrective action. The decision of the AFDRB appears to be based on the
evidence of record and has not been rebutted by the applicant. Absent
persuasive evidence the applicant was denied rights to which entitled,
appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were
not applied, a majority of the board finds no basis to disturb the existing
record.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice
and recommends the application be denied.
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on October 10, 2000, under the provisions of AFI36-2603:
Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Panel Chair Ms. Melinda J. Loftin, Member
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
By a majority vote, the Board recommended denial of the application. Mr.
Terry A. Yonkers voted to upgrade the discharge to general, under honorable
conditions, but does not wish to submit a Minority Report. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Exhibit D.
DD Form 149, dated 22 Feb 00, w/atchs. Applicant's Master Personnel Records
AFDRB Brief, dated 12 Jul 00, w/atchs. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 25 Aug 00.
2
AFBCMR 00-01633
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XX be corrected to show that on 16 October 1998, he was
discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable
conditions).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01323 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C be upgraded. In support of his request applicant has provided a letter from AFPC/DPPRRB, dated 24 Mar 00, announcing the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) decision to...
We conclude therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper in characterization of the discharge and was appropriate to the existing circumstances. Exhibit B. Exhibit C. AFDRB Brief, dated 15 November 1996.
The AFDRB brief was forwarded to applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Available Master Personnel Records C. AFDRB Brief D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 9 March 1950 (Exhibit B). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 7 October 1999 and 26 September 2000. Applicant's response to the AFDRB is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Members of the Board Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Ms. Carolyn J. Watkins, Mr. John E. Pettit considered this application on 17 January 2001 in accordance with the...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 7 October 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).) After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 8 October 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).) After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00420 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general under honorable conditions. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.