Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-00038
Original file (BC-1997-00038.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:            DOCKET NUMBER:  97-00038
                       INDEX CODE:  108

                       COUNSEL:  NONE

                       HEARING:  YES


The applicant requests that his disability discharge with  entitlement
to 20% severance pay be changed to reflect  disability  retirement  at
40%.  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.

The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated  applicant's  request  and
provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending  the  application
be denied (Exhibit C).  The advisory opinions were  forwarded  to  the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).  As of  this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

After careful consideration of applicant's request and  the  available
evidence  of  record,  we  find  insufficient  evidence  of  error  or
injustice to warrant corrective action.  The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of  record
and have not been adequately rebutted by applicant.  Absent persuasive
evidence applicant was denied rights to  which  entitled,  appropriate
regulations were not  followed,  or  appropriate  standards  were  not
applied,  we  find  no  basis  to   disturb   the   existing   record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.

The documentation provided with this case was sufficient to  give  the
Board a clear understanding of the  issues  involved  and  a  personal
appearance, with or without counsel, would not have  materially  added
to that understanding.  Therefore, the request for a  hearing  is  not
favorably considered.

The Board staff is directed to  inform  applicant  of  this  decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of  new  relevant  evidence
which was not reasonably available at the  time  the  application  was
filed.

Members of the Board Ms. Cathlynn Sparks,  Mr.  Mike  Novel,  and  Mr.
Steven A. Shaw  considered  this  application  on  25  March  1999  in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction  36-2603,  and
the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.



                           CATHLYNN SPARKS
                           Panel Chair

Exhibits:

A.  Applicant's DD Form 149
B.  Available Master Personnel Records
C.  Advisory Opinion
D.  AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
E.  Applicant’s Response
F.  Additional Advisory Opinion

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9700038

    Original file (9700038.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802158

    Original file (9802158.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0000307

    Original file (0000307.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9903258

    Original file (9903258.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The report was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit G). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion E. AFBCMR Post Service Request F. FBI Report G. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding FBI Report

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9602908

    Original file (9602908.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1997 | 9700404

    Original file (9700404.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1997 | 9700405

    Original file (9700405.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant s request on 30 January 1 9 9 7 (Exhibit B). The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant and applicant's counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03698

    Original file (BC-2004-03698.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03698 INDEX CODE: 110.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES Mandatory Case Completion Date: 7 Jun 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation be changed to reflect an effective date of 18 Feb 76, rather than 1 Sep 77. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00561

    Original file (BC-2005-00561.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00561 INDEX CODE: 112.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Aug 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he has 21 years, 7 months, and 8 days of total active service, rather than 19 years and 20 days. He enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 30 Jun 58 for a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03761

    Original file (BC-2004-03761.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant does not offer evidence in support of the claim as required by AFI 36-2603, Air Force for Correction of Military Records, and AFP 36-2607, Applicant's Guide to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR). The applicant did not participate in VEAP, therefore, does not qualify under the law to participate in VEAP or convert to the MGIB under the current statues. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.