AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 96- 02908
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APB 2 4 1991
Applicant requests 22 days of leave be restored. Applicant's
submission is at Exhibit A .
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C ) .
The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Ms. Cathlynn Sparks, Mr. Frank J. Colson,
and Mr. Joseph G. Diamond considered this application on 22 April
1 9 9 7 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction
3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1 5 5 2 .
Panel Chairman
Exhibits :
A . Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 9 March 1950 (Exhibit B). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
As noted by the Air National Guard (ANG) , in their advisory opinion of 8 Jun 98 (Exhibit C) , applicant's social security number will be corrected upon resolution of his case. applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
t I AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 9 8 - 0 0 1 2 4 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that he be awarded the Aerial Achievement Medal ( A A M ) , Fourth Oak Leaf Cluster, for his support in Humanitarian Operations for the period 7 Dec 9 2 to 22 Mar 9 4 . Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. i- The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE DENVER CENTER 6760 E. IWINGTON PLACE DENVER, COLORADO 80279 DFAS-DE/FYCC MEMORANDUM FOR AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS ATTN: AFBCMR SUBJECT: Application for Correction of...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant requests award of the Legion of Merit, recommended 6 Sep 43, but never received. We recommend disapproval of the applicant's request to be awarded the Legion of Merit based on a World War 11 recommendation.
Medical documents recorded reflect his injury as an accidental fall. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and prgvided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).