RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00825
INDEX CODE: 100.03
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he can
enlist in the United States Marine Corps.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Applicant makes no contentions on his application.
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD)
was 12 Apr 94.
Applicant has two Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs) reflecting a
rating of “3” and “4” respectively.
On 17 May 96, applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to
impose nonjudicial punishment upon him for operating a vehicle, to
wit: a passenger car, while the alcohol concentration on his breath
was 0.10 grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath or greater,
specifically .104 grams of alcohol per 210 liters, as shown by
chemical analysis.
On 22 May 96, after consulting with counsel, applicant waived his
right to a trial by court-martial, requested a personal appearance and
submitted a written presentation.
On 22 May 96, he was found guilty by his commander who imposed the
following punishment: Reduction from the grade of airman first class
to the grade of airman, with a new date of rank (DOR) of 22 May 96.
Applicant did not appeal the punishment. The Article 15 was filed in
his Unfavorable Information File (UIF).
On 11 Apr 98, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force under
the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service)
with an honorable characterization of service in the grade of airman
first class with an RE Code of 4E (Grade is airman first class or
below and airman completed 31 or more months, if a first-term airman).
He was credited with four years of active service.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Skills Management Branch, AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed this
application and indicated that a review of applicant’s military record
confirms he separated from active duty in the grade of airman first
class with over 31 months’ service. Considering this, DPPAE
recommends denial of applicant’s request for change of his RE code.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on
24 May 99 for review and response. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After noting that the
applicant was issued an honorable discharge, we believe that his RE
code should be changed to “3K” in order that he may apply for
enlistment in the Marine Corps. The applicant should be aware,
however, that this recommendation in no way establishes an entitlement
to enlist; it only makes him eligible to apply. Whether or not he is
selected for enlistment will be based on the needs of the service to
which application is made.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his RE code, issued
in conjunction with his honorable discharge on 11 Apr 98, was RE 3K.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 14 December 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Patricia J. Zarodkiewicz, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Member
Ms. Melinda J. Loftin, Member
Mrs. Joyce Earley, Examiner (without vote)
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, undated.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 7 May 99.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 24 May 99.
PATRICIA J. ZARODKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
INDEX CODE: 100.03
AFBCMR 99-00825
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to be corrected to show that his
reenlistment eligibility (RE) code, issued in conjunction with his
honorable discharge on 11 April 1998, was RE 3K.
JOE G.
LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force
Review Boards Agency
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02083 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4H be changed to 1J, which defined means “Eligible to reenlist, but elects separation.” RE Code 4H is defined as “Serving suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02376
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02376 INDEX CODES: 100.06, 126.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The nonjudicial punishment under Article 15 initiated on 6 Apr 98 and imposed on 23 Apr 98 be set aside and removed from his records. He asked four times about his rights regarding the base and state driving laws. Therefore,...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00977 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow eligibility to enlist in the Air National Guard or Air Force Reserves. After 15 years of active duty commitment, he would like to continue giving to his country as...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02991 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to one that will allow her entry into the Air Force or Air Force Reserve. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02810 INDEX 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1996 general discharge be upgraded to honorable so he can join the Air National Guard or the Reserves. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: After a personal hearing on 3 September 1998,...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02314
At the time of his discharge on 16 December 2004, he was serving in the grade of airman first class (E-3), and had completed 5 years, 2 months, and 3 days of net active service. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 31 August 2007, for review and comment, within 30 days. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Reginald P....
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02965 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow eligibility to reenter the Air Force. He requests additional information be provided concerning his discharge. A complete copy of this response is appended...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04112
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-04112 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4H be changed to allow eligibility to enlist in the Air National Guard. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). Sufficient relevant evidence has...
_________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 8 September 1999, he was separated under the provisions of AFR 36-3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial Authority) with a separation code of JFF and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 27 Apr 01. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Panel Chair AFBCMR...
On 1 Dec 97, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service) with an honorable characterization of service in the grade of senior airman with an RE code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. Exhibit E. Letter fr applicant,...