Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802904
Original file (9802904.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:            DOCKET NUMBER:  98-02904
                       INDEX CODE:  131

                       COUNSEL:  NONE

                       HEARING:  YES


The applicant requests that he be  considered  for  promotion  to  the
grade of lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection  Board  (SSB),  for
the Calendar Year 98B (CY98B)  Central  Lieutenant  Colonel  Selection
Board, to include evidence of his nomination to attend Defense Systems
Management College (DSMC).  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.

The appropriate Air Force office  evaluated  applicant's  request  and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application
be denied (Exhibit C).  The advisory  opinion  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant’s response to
the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E.

After careful consideration of applicant's request and  the  available
evidence  of  record,  we  find  insufficient  evidence  of  error  or
injustice to warrant corrective action.  The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence  of  record
and have not been adequately rebutted by applicant.  Absent persuasive
evidence applicant was denied rights to  which  entitled,  appropriate
regulations were not  followed,  or  appropriate  standards  were  not
applied,  we  find  no  basis  to   disturb   the   existing   record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.

The documentation provided with this case was sufficient to  give  the
Board a clear understanding of the  issues  involved  and  a  personal
appearance, with or without counsel, would not have  materially  added
to that understanding.  Therefore, the request for a  hearing  is  not
favorably considered.

The Board staff is directed to  inform  applicant  of  this  decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of  new  relevant  evidence
which was not reasonably available at the  time  the  application  was
filed.

Members of the Board Ms. Patricia  J.  Zarodkiewicz,  Ms.  Dorothy  P.
Loeb, and Ms. Olga M. Crerar considered this application on
27 April  1999  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Air   Force
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.





                           PATRICIA J. ZARODKIEWICZ
                           Panel Chair

Exhibits:

A.  Applicant's DD Form 149
B.  Available Master Personnel Records
C.  Advisory Opinion
D.  AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
E.  Applicant’s Response

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803007

    Original file (9803007.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00970

    Original file (BC-2007-00970.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00970 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 SEP 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) be corrected to reflect “Joint Specialty Officer (JSO)” in the Joint Reporting Category (JRC) and his corrected record be considered by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802296

    Original file (9802296.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002762

    Original file (0002762.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801051

    Original file (9801051.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-01051

    Original file (BC-1998-01051.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03707

    Original file (BC-2006-03707.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03707 INDEX CODE: 131.01, 107.00 xxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: MR. MANEY HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 JUN 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive direct promotion to the grade of colonel by the CY04A Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB). The DPPPO complete evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01357

    Original file (BC-2008-01357.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His personnel records be changed to reflect credit for a deployment rather than being cited for his PCS assignment to Al Udeid Air Base from Jun 06 – Jun 07, and his record be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2007B (CY07B) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB). In addition, he notes that an article from the Air Force Times indicates that Air Force policy has changed to mask deployment histories in the OSB. B. TAYLOR, JR. Chief Examiner Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02084

    Original file (BC-2007-02084.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02084 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 JANUARY 2009 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (1OLC) be included in the CY06C Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) Officer Selection Record (OSR) that will be meeting a Special...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9803190

    Original file (9803190.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.