RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-02184
INDEX CODE 107.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
Applicant requests he be awarded the Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait)
(KLMK) and the Kuwait Liberation Medal (Saudi Arabia) (KLMSA).
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated the applicant's request and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board. The opinion advises that
the applicant’s records have been administratively corrected to
reflect award of the KLMK. However, the opinion recommends the
applicant’s request for the KLMSA be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory
opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this
office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record
and have not been rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence
applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations
were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find
no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The documentation provided with this case was sufficient to give the
Board a clear understanding of the issues involved and a personal
appearance, with or without legal counsel, would not have materially
added to that understanding. Therefore, the request for a hearing is
not favorably considered.
Members of the Board Mr. Michael P. Higgins, Mr. Richard A. Peterson,
and Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler considered this application on 2 February
1999 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-
2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 97-01841 m COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES Applicant requests that he be awarded the medal designated for service in the Desert Storm War. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D) .
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). disapproval of the applicant's request for award of Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). While on a tour, he stopped the bus for the members to see a herd of camels. This office is responsible for determining Air Force members’ eligibility and entitlement to awards and decorations, and your case was sent to us for review.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02154
On 31 May 11, the applicant officially changed his name. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: SAF/MR memorandum, Guidance to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, dated 9 Mar 15, states that while the AFBCMR generally has the authority to correct an applicants records to reflect a legal change in the applicants name, it should exercise discretion is doing so. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with respect...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not available at the time the application was filed.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00483
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00483 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Kuwait Liberation Medal – Kuwait (KLM-M), the Kuwait Liberation Medal – Saudi Arabia (KLM-SA), and the National Defense Service Medal. ...